The present investigation examined how three salient features of narrative thinking (situation model construction, linguistic concreteness, and perspective-taking) influenced the social inference process. Results of four experiments indicated that compared with those given other objectives, perceivers given narrative objectives were: (a) more likely to make situation rather than trait attributions for observed behaviors (Experiment 1), (b) less likely to make implicit trait inferences (Experiment 2), and (c) less likely to rely on behavior valence when making evaluative judgments (Experiment 4). Linguistic analyses indicated that narrative construction consistently entailed the creation of situation models of events and linguistic concreteness, but only situation model creation mediated the relationship between narrative and inferences. Experiment 3 confirmed the mediating role of situation models: Perceivers with narrative objectives made trait inferences only when behaviors were inconsistent with contextual information. The role of these core narrative features on social perceptions is discussed.
AdavalR.IsbellL. M.WyerR. S. (2007). The impact of pictures on narrative-and list-based impression formation: A process interference model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 352-364.
2.
BrunerJ. S. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J. (1994). Savings in relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 840-856.
4.
CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J.SparksC. (1995). Savings in relearning II: On the formation of behavior-based trait associations and inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 420-436.
5.
CohenJ. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245-264.
6.
CostabileK. A. (2011). Rude or rushed? Effects of narrative and impression processing objectives on person perception. Social Cognition, 29, 445-475.
7.
CostabileK. A.KleinS. B. (2008). Understanding and predicting social events: The effects of narrative construction on inference generation. Social Cognition, 26, 455-472.
8.
EbbinghausH. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
10.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1984). Social cognition (1st ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
GraesserA. C.McNamaraD. S.LouwerseM.CaiZ. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202.
12.
GraesserA. C.OttatiV. (1995). Why stories? Some evidence, questions, and challenges. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. VII, pp. 121-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
GraesserA. C.SingerM.TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
14.
HamiltonD. L.KatzL. B.LeirerV. O. (1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1050-1063.
15.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
16.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 129-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
KelleyH. H.MichaelaJ. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
18.
KrullD. S.EricksonD. J. (1995). Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information into account. Social Cognition, 13, 417-438.
19.
MaglianoJ. P.SkowronskiJ. J.BrittM. A.GussC. G.ForsytheC. (2008). What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others. Cognition, 106, 594-632.
MalleB. F.KnobeJ. M.NelsonS. E. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 491-514.
22.
McNamaraD. S.GraesserA. C. (2012). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing. In McCarthyP. M.BoonthumC. (Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp.118-205). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
23.
MorrowD. G.BowerG. H.GreenspanS. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292-312.
24.
NelsonK. (1989). Narratives from the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
NewmanL. S. (1996). Trait impressions as heuristics for predicting future behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 496-504.
26.
PenningtonN.HastieR. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In HastieR. (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192-221). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
28.
RappD. N.GerrigR. J.PrenticeD. A. (2001). Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737-750.
29.
ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (1993). Rapist or “regular guy”: Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 526-540.
30.
ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (2005). Explanatory coherence and goal-based knowledge structures in making dispositional inferences. In MalleB. F.HodgesS. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 124-139). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
ReederG. D. (2009). Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 1-18.
32.
ReederG. D.TrafimowD. (2005). Attributing motives to other people. In MalleB. F.HodgesS. D. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 106-123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
ReederG. D.VonkR.RonkM. J.HamJ.LawrenceM. (2004). Dispositional attribution: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 530-544.
34.
RimS.UlemanJ. S.TropeY. (2009). Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1088-1097.
35.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In WyerR. S. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. VIII, pp. 1-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
ToddA. R.MoldenD. C.HamJ.VonkR. (2011). The automatic and co-occurring activation of multiple social inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 37-49.
37.
TodorovA.UlemanJ. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549-562.
38.
TropeY. (1974). Inferential processes in the forced compliance situation: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1-16.
39.
van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
40.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472.
41.
VorauerJ. D. (2013). The case for and against perspective-taking. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 59-115.
42.
WhitneyP.Williams-WhitneyD. (1990). Toward a contextualist view of elaborative inferences. In GraesserA. C.BowerG. H. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 279-293). New York, NY: Academic Press.
43.
WinterL.UlemanJ. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252.
44.
WyerR. S. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
ZwaanR. A.MaglianoJ. P.GraesserA. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.
46.
ZwaanR. A.RadvanskyG. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
