The trait and social cognitive perspectives are considered disparate approaches to understanding personality. We suggest an integrative view in which three elements derived from the social cognitive perspective (i.e., situations, behaviors, and explanations [SBEs]) form the basis of personality traits. Study 1 demonstrated strong associations between traits and SBEs across the Big Five dimensions. Studies 2 through 7 tested the discriminative validity, internal structure, and unique contributions of the individual components of SBEs. Studies 8 and 9 demonstrated that the strong associations between traits and SBEs generalize to different cultures. The present work suggests that SBEs may be a universal folk psychological mechanism underlying personality traits.
BanduraA. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9-44.
2.
CervoneD. (1999). Bottom-up explanation in personality psychology: The case of cross-situational coherence. In CervoneD.ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 303-341). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
CervoneD.ShadelW. G.JenciusS. (2001). Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33-51.
4.
ChenP. Y.PopovichP. M. (2002). Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
DigmanJ. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
6.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
7.
FleesonW. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83-87.
8.
FleesonW. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 33-63). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
FleesonW.GallagherP. (2009). The implications of big-five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097-1114.
10.
FleesonW.NoftleE. (2008). The end of the person-situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667-1684.
11.
FunderD. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221.
12.
FunderD. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21-34.
13.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
14.
HampsonS. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin.”Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315-339.
15.
HochschildA. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
16.
JacksonJ. J.HillP. L.RobertsB. W. (2012). Misconceptions of traits continue to persist: A response to Bandura. Journal of Management, 38, 745-752.
17.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
JohnsonJ. A. (1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 73-93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
KammrathL. K.Mendoza-DentonR.MischelW. (2005). Incorporating if . . . then . . . signatures in person perception: Beyond the person-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 605-618.
20.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
21.
KruegerR. F.JohnsonW. (2008). Behavioral genetics and personality: A new look at the integration of nature and nurture. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 287-310). New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
McCabeK. O.FleesonW. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498-1505.
24.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
MehlM. R.GoslingS. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862-877.
26.
MillerL. C.ReadS. J. (1991). Inter-personalism: Understanding persons in relationships. In JonesW. H.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: A research annual (Vol. 2, pp. 233-267). Oxford, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
27.
MischelW. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
28.
MischelW. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science, 2009. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282-290.
29.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological review, 102, 246-268.
30.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
31.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
32.
PeltoP. J. (1968, April). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5, 37-40.
33.
PervinL.A. (Ed.). (1989). Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34.
PervinL. A. (2003). The science of personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
Pytlik ZilligL. M.HemenoverS. H.DienstbierR. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral and cognitive processes represented in the Big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847-858.
36.
RauthmannJ. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it’s lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver x situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519-528.
37.
ReadS. J.JonesD. K.MillerL. C. (1990). Traits as goal-based categories: The importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1048-1061.
38.
ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (1989). The importance of goals in personality: Toward a coherent model of persons. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Social intelligence and cognitive assessments of personality: Advances in social cognition (pp. 163-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
ReadS. J.MonroeB. M.BrownsteinA. L.YangY.ChopraG.MillerL. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61-92.
40.
RobertsB. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and Assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 137-145.
41.
RobertsB. W.JacksonJ. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523-1544.
42.
RobertsB. W.KuncelN.ShinerR. N.CaspiA.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.
43.
RobertsB. W.MroczekD. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31-35.
44.
SaucierG.Bel-BaharT.FernandezC. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479-504.
45.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343.
46.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101.
47.
SwannW. B.SeyleC. (2005). Personality psychology’s comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155-165.
48.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
49.
VansteelandtK.Van MechelenI. (1998). Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: A triple typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 751-765.
50.
WernerP. D.PervinL. A. (1986). The content of personality inventory items. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 622-628.
51.
YangY.ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750-778.
52.
YangY.ReadS. J.MillerL. C. (2009). The concept of situations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1018-1037.
