We propose a motivational affordance account to explain both stability and variability in risk-taking propensity in major decision domains. We draw on regulatory focus theory to differentiate two types of motivation (prevention, promotion) that play a key role in predicting risk-taking. Study 1 demonstrated that prevention motivation is negatively associated with risk-taking across six key decision domains, including health/safety, ethics, recreation, gambling, investment, and social. In contrast, promotion motivation is positively associated with risk-taking in the social and investment domains. Study 2 replicated the same pattern and provided direct evidence that promotion motivation is a strong predictor of risk-taking only in domains where there is true potential for gains. Study 3 manipulated promotion (vs. prevention) motivation experimentally to demonstrate that motivational affordance is a critical mechanism for understanding risk-taking behaviors.
BaumeisterR. F.HeathertonT. F.TiceD. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
BiesanzJ. C.FalkC. F.SavaleiV. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 661-701. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.498292
3.
BlaisA. R.WeberE. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
4.
BrendlC. M.HigginsE. T.LemmK. M. (1995). Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: The role of self-discrepancies and event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1028-1051. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1028
5.
BrocknerJ.HigginsE. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 35-66. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
6.
BromileyP.CurleyS. (1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In YatesFrankJ. (Eds), Risk-taking behavior. Wiley series in human performance and cognition. (pp. 87-132). New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
ByrnesJ. P.MillerD. C.SchaferW. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
8.
CantorN. (1994). Life task problem solving: Situational affordances and personal needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 235-243. doi:10.1177/0146167294203001
9.
CroweE.HigginsE. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
10.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G. (1977). Block and psychoticism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 5, 651-652. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.86.6.651
11.
FosterJ. D.SheneseyJ. W.GoffJ. S. (2009). Why do narcissists take more risks? Testing the roles of perceived risks and benefits of risky behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 885-889. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.008
12.
FoxC. R.TannenbaumD. (2011). The elusive search for stable risk preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 298. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00298
13.
FreitasA. L.HigginsE. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00401
14.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
15.
GibsonJ. J. (1977). The theory of affordance. In ShawR.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
GinoF.MargolisJ. D. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 145-156. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.006
17.
HanochY.JohnsonJ. G.WilkeA. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment. Psychological Science, 17, 300-304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01702.x
18.
HawsK. L.DholakiaU. M.BeardenW. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 967-982. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.5.967
19.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
21.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27
22.
HigginsE. T.RoneyC. J. R.CroweE.HymesC. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276
23.
IsenA. M.SimmondsS. F. (1978). The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 346-349. doi:10.2307/3033588
24.
JianakopolosN. A.BernasekA. (1998). Are women more risk averse?Economic Inquiry, 36, 620-630. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
25.
JianakopolosN. A.BernasekA. (2006). Financial risk taking by age and birth cohort. Southern Economic Journal, 72, 981-1001. doi:10.2307/20111864
26.
JohnsonJ.WilkeA.WeberE. U. (2004). Beyond a trait view of risk taking: A Domain-Specific Scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitudes in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153-172.
27.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185
28.
KarkR.Van DijkD. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32, 500-528. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351846
29.
KitayamaS.MesquitaB.KarasawaM. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890
30.
KoganN.WallachM. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. doi:10.2307/1420596
31.
LakeyC. E.RoseP.CampbellW. L.GoodieA. S. (2008). Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: The mediating role of judgment and decision-making biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 113-137. doi:10.1002/bdm.582
32.
LeithK. P.BaumeisterR. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1250-1267. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1250
33.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.. . . BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75
34.
MaccrimmonK. R.WehrungD. A. (1990). Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management Science, 36, 422-435. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.4.422
35.
MoldenD. C.HigginsE. T. (2004). Categorization under uncertainty: Resolving vagueness and ambiguity with eager versus vigilant strategies. Social Cognition, 22, 248-277. doi:10.1521/soco.22.2.248.35461
36.
MoldenD. C.HigginsE. T. (2008). How preferences for eager versus vigilant judgment strategies affect self-serving conclusions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1219-1228. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.009
37.
NicholsonN. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157-176. doi:10.1080/1366987032000123856
38.
SchoemakerP. J. H. (1990). Are risk-attitudes related across domains and response modes?Management Science, 36, 1451-1463. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.12.1451
39.
ScholerA. A.StroessnerS. J.HigginsE. T. (2008). Responding to negativity: How a risky tactic can serve a vigilant strategy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 767-774. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.06.006
40.
ScholerA. A.ZouX.FujitaK.StroessnerS. J.HigginsE. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 215-231. doi:10.1037/a0019715
41.
ShahJ.HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
42.
SlovicP. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
43.
SlovicP.FischhoffB.LichtensteinS. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In SchwingR. C.AlbersW. A. (Eds.), Societal risk assessment (pp. 181-216). New York, NY: Springer.
44.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
45.
StephensonM. T.HoyleR. H.PalmgreenP.SlaterM. D. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72, 279-286. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.08.003
46.
WangJ.LeeA. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28-38. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.1.28
47.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
48.
WeberE. U. (1988). A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psychologica, 69, 185-203.
49.
WeberE. U.BlaisA. R.BetzN. E. (2002). A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414
50.
WeberE. U.HseeC. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44, 1205-1217. doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
51.
WeberE. U.MillimanR. A. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43, 123-144. doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123
52.
YatesJ. F.StoneE. R. (1992). The risk construct. In YatesJ. F. (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 1-25). New York, NY: John Wiley.
53.
ZhangY. L.MittalV. (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 588-598. doi:10.1177/0146167206296954
54.
ZouX.ScholerA. A.HigginsE. T. (2014). In pursuit of progress: Promotion motivation and risk preference in the domain of gains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 183-201. doi:10.1037/a0035391
55.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00124
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
