Persistent academic achievement gaps exist between university students from high and low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. The current research proposes that the extent to which a university is perceived as actively supporting versus passively neglecting students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds can influence low-SES students’ academic motivation and self-concepts. In Experiments 1 and 2, low-SES students exposed to cues suggestive of an institution’s warmth toward socioeconomic diversity demonstrated greater academic efficacy, expectations, and implicit associations with high academic achievement compared with those exposed to cues indicating institutional chilliness. Exploring the phenomenology underlying these effects, Experiment 3 demonstrated that warmth cues led low-SES students to perceive their socioeconomic background as a better match with the rest of the student body and to perceive the university as more socioeconomically diverse than did chilliness cues. Contributions to our understanding of low-SES students’ psychological experiences in academic settings and practical implications for academic institutions are discussed.
BakerM. A.Sgoutas-EmchS. A. (2014). Evidence-based strategic planning: Using mixed methods and the social ecological model to target student financial stress. College Student Affairs Journal, 32(1), 113-128.
2.
BaumS.MaJ.PayeaK. (2013). Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. New York, NY: The College Board.
3.
BowenW. G.KurzweilM. A.TobinE. M. (2006). Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
4.
ChapmanC.LairdJ.RemaniA. K. (2011). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972–2009. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
CroizetJ. C.ClaireT. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594. doi:10.1177/0146167298246003
7.
DestinM.OysermanD. (2009). From assets to school outcomes: How finances shape children’s perceived possibilities and intentions. Psychological Science, 20, 414-418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02309.x
8.
DevosT.Cruz TorresJ. A. (2007). Implicit identification with academic achievement among Latino college students: The role of ethnic identity and significant others. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 293-310. doi:10.1080/01973530701503432
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
10.
FlamF. (1991). Still a “chilly climate” for women?Science, 252, 1604-1606. doi:10.1126/science.252.5013.1604
11.
HallR. M.SandlerB. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
12.
HarackiewiczJ. M.CanningE. A.TibbettsY.GiffenC. J.BlairS. S.RouseD. I.HydeJ. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 375-389. doi:10.1037/a0034679
13.
HullJ. (2010). Chasing the college acceptance letter: Is it harder to get into college?Alexandria, VA: Center for Public Education.
14.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463. doi:10.1177/1745691612454134
15.
IshitaniT. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 861-885. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0042
16.
JohnsonS. E.RichesonJ. A.FinkelE. J. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 838-852. doi:10.1037/a0021956
17.
JuryM.SmedingA.DarnonC. (2015). First-generation students’ underperformance at university: The impact of the function of selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 710. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00710
18.
KrausM. W.StephensN. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 642-656. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x
19.
KurzbanR.DuckworthA.KableJ. W.MyersJ. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661-679. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003196
20.
LaneK. A.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G. (2007). Understanding and using the implicit association test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In WittenbrinkB.SchwarzN. S. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59-102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
LareauA.ConleyD. (2008). Social class: How does it work?New York, NY: Russell Sage.
22.
MarkusH. R.KundaZ. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858-866. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.858
23.
MarkusH. R.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
24.
McConnellA. R. (2011). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3-27. doi:10.1177/1088868310371101
25.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
26.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879-885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
27.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014). OECD indicators: Education at a Glance 2014. doi:10.1787/eag-2014-en
29.
Office of Undergraduate Admission. (2014). Financial aid. Available from http://bit.ly/1zFGM16
30.
OstroveJ. M.LongS. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. Review of Higher Education, 30, 363-389. doi:10.1353/rhe.2007.0028
31.
OysermanD. (2013). Not just any path: Implications of identity-based motivation for disparities in school outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 33, 179-190. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.09.002
32.
OysermanD.DestinM. (2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 1001-1043. doi:10.1177/0011000010374775
33.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444-446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
34.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
35.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
36.
RamseyL. R.BetzD. E.SekaquaptewaD. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 377-397. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6
37.
RheinschmidtM. L.Mendoza-DentonR. (2014). Social class and academic achievement in college: The interplay of rejection sensitivity and entity beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 101-121. doi:10.1037/a0036553
38.
RumbergerR. W. (2010). Education and the reproduction of economic inequality in the United States: An empirical investigation. Economics of Education Review, 29, 246-254. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.006
39.
SchunkD. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
40.
SmedingA.DarnonC.SouchalC.Toczek-CapelleM.-C.ButeraF. (2013). Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at university by promoting mastery-oriented assessment. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071678
41.
SomersP.CoferJ. (1997). Singing the student loan blues: Multiple voices, multiple approaches? In Student loan debt: Problems and prospects (pp. 97-128). Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy, Sallie Mae Education Institute, and Education Resources Institute.
42.
SpencerB.CastanoE. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals. Social Justice Research, 20, 418-432. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7
43.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
44.
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1178-1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143
45.
StephensN. M.HamedaniM. G.DestinM. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25, 943-953. doi:10.1177/0956797613518349
46.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsL. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611-634. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143
47.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2013. Washington, DC: Author.
50.
VerkuytenM. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 148-184. doi:10.1080/10463280600937418
51.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
52.
ZiskinM.FischerM. A.TorresV.PellicciottiB.Player-SandersJ. (2014). Working students’ perceptions of paying for college: Understanding the connections between financial aid and work. The Review of Higher Education, 37, 429-467. doi:10.1353/rhe.2014.0028
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
