Based on construal-level theory (CLT) and its view of power as an instance of social distance, we predicted that high, relative to low power would enhance women’s mental-rotation performance and impede their emotion-recognition performance. The predicted effects of power emerged both when it was manipulated via a recall priming task (Study 1) and environmental cues (Studies 2 and 3). Studies 3 and 4 found evidence for mediation by construal level of the effect of power on emotion recognition but not on mental rotation. We discuss potential mediating mechanisms for these effects based on both the social distance/construal level and the approach/inhibition views of power. We also discuss implications for optimizing performance on mental rotation and emotion recognition in everyday life.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161-167.
2.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
3.
BarkeH. D. (1993). Chemical education and spatial ability. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 70, 968-971.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Baron-CohenS. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 248-254.
6.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ. J.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42, 241-251.
7.
BerdahlJ. L.MartoranaP. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
8.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.
9.
BockR. D.KolakowskiD. F. (1973). Further evidence of sex-linked major gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 1-14.
10.
BodnerG. M.GuayR. B. (1997). The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1-18.
11.
BurnettS. A.LaneD. M.DrattL. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 3, 345-354.
12.
CarneyD. R.CuddyA. J. C.YapA. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363-1368.
13.
CarpenterP. A.JustM. A.ShellP. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
14.
CaseyM. B.NuttallR.PezarisE.BenbowC. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697-705.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
17.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ.ApfelN.MasterA. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307-1310.
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
CollinsD. W.KimuraD. (1997). A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 845-849.
20.
DavisM. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
21.
DearingE.HamiltonL. C. (2006). Contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 88-104.
22.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.MeadN. L.VohsK. D. (2011). How leaders self-regulate their task performance: Evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 47-65.
23.
EfronB. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 171-200.
24.
ElfenbeinH. A.AmbadyN. (2002). Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition?Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243-249.
25.
EllisonJ. W.MassaroD. W. (1997). Featural evaluation, integration, and judgment of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 213-226.
26.
FastN. J.GruenfeldD. H.SivanathanN.GalinskyA. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508.
27.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. The American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
28.
FörsterJ.FriedmanR. S.LibermanN. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
29.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.ShapiraO. (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 383-399.
30.
FujitaK.HendersonM.EngJ.TropeY.LibermanN. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
31.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
32.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.
33.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
34.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
GasperK. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 405-421.
36.
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
37.
GervaisS. J.GuinoteA.AllenJ.SlabuL. (2013). Power increases situated creativity. Social Influence, 8, 294-311.
38.
GolanO.Baron-CohenS.HillJ. J. (2006). The “reading the mind in films” task: Complex emotion recognition in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions. Social Neuroscience, 1, 111-123.
39.
GoughH. G.McClosckyH.MeehlP. E. (1951). A personality scale for dominance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 46, 360-366. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14860973
40.
GuayR. (1977). Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
41.
GuilfordJ. P.FruchterB.ZimmermanW. S. (1952). Factor analysis of the Army Air Forces Sheppard Field Battery of Experimental Aptitude Tests. Psychometrica, 16, 45-68.
42.
GuinoteA. (2007a). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685-697.
43.
GuinoteA. (2007b). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.
44.
GuinoteA. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237-252.
45.
HallJ. A. (1978). Gender differences in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845-857.
46.
HallJ. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
HuangL.GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.GuilloryL. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior?Psychological Science, 22, 95-102.
48.
KaufmanS. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity?Intelligence, 35, 211-223.
KimuraD. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 282-290.
52.
LangnerC. A.KeltnerD. (2008). Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 848-856.
53.
LibermanN.FörsterJ. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global versus local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 203-216.
54.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
55.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
56.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
57.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.
58.
MartensA.JohnsM.GreenbergJ.SchimelJ. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236-243.
MarxD. M.RomanJ. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183-1193.
61.
MayerJ. D.RobertsR. D.BarsadeS. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536.
62.
McClureE. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424-453.
63.
MichaelW. B.GuilfordJ. P.FruchterB.ZimmermanW. S. (1957). The description of spatial-visualization abilities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 17, 185-199.
64.
NavonD. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
65.
NormanK. L. (1994). Spatial visualization: A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 195-203.
66.
NowickiS. J.DukeM. P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 9-35.
67.
PalermoR.RhodesG. (2002). The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception. Cognition, 82, 225-257.
68.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
69.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 40, 879-891.
70.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115.
71.
Quaiser-PohlC.LehmannW. (2002). Girls’ spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260.
72.
SaloveyP.MayerJ. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
73.
Schmid MastM.JonasK.HallJ. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835-850.
74.
ShapiraO.LibermanN.TropeY.RimS. (2012). Levels of mental construal. In FiskeS. T.MacreaC. N. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 229-250). New York, NY: SAGE.
75.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
76.
SmithI. M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego, CA: Robert R. Knapp.
77.
SmithP. K.JostmannN. B.GalinskyA. D.van DijkW. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441-447.
78.
SmithP. K.TropeY. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.
79.
SmithP. K.WigboldusD. H. J.DijksterhuisA. (2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 378-385.
80.
SorbyS. A.LeopoldC.GórskaR. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons of gender differences in the spatial skills of engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 279-291.
81.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
82.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
83.
Stone-RomeroE. F.RosopaP. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326-352.
84.
ThurstoneL. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
85.
ToossiM. (2002). Century of change: The US labor force, 1950-2050. Monthly Labor Review, 125, 15-28.
86.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
87.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671.
88.
Van der SchalkJ.HawkS. T.FischerA. H.DoosjeB. J. (2011). Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907-920.
89.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
