Four studies tested the proposition that regulation of collective guilt in the face of harmful ingroup behavior involves motivated reasoning. Cognitive energetics theory suggests that motivated reasoning is a function of goal importance, mental resource availability, and task demands. Accordingly, three studies conducted in the United States and Israel demonstrated that high importance of avoiding collective guilt, represented by group identification (Studies 1 and 3) and conservative ideological orientation (Study 2), is negatively related to collective guilt, but only when mental resources are not depleted by cognitive load. The fourth study, conducted in Italy, demonstrated that when justifications for the ingroup’s harmful behavior are immediately available, the task of regulating collective guilt and shame becomes less demanding and less susceptible to resource depletion. By combining knowledge from the domains of motivated cognition, emotion regulation, and intergroup relations, these cross-cultural studies offer novel insights regarding factors underlying the regulation of collective guilt.
AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.MasterS. L.YeeC. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246-1247. doi:10.1038/nn1979
2.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
3.
Bar-TalD. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 22-50. doi:10.1108/eb022803
4.
Bar-TalD. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Bar-TalD. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025195
6.
BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.). (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139106931
7.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
BranscombeN. R.MironA. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In TiedensL. Z.LeachC. W. (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 336-356). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819568.017
9.
BranscombeN. R.SlugoskiB.KappenD. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16-34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139106931
10.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
11.
BrownR.ČehajićS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669-684. doi:10.1002/ejsp.466
12.
BrownR.GonzálezR.ZagefkaH.ManziJ.ČehajićS. (2008). Nuestra Culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75
13.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
14.
CastanoE. (2008). On the perils of glorifying the ingroup: Intergroup violence, ingroup glorification, and moral disengagement. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 154-170. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00040.x
15.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.PaladinoM.-P.SacchiS. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135-143. doi:10.1177/0146167202282001
16.
CoullA.YzerbytV. Y.CastanoE.PaladinoM. P.LeemansV. (2001). Protecting the ingroup: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 327-339. doi:10.1177/1368430201004004003
17.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
18.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
19.
Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
21.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1049. doi:10.1037/a0015141
22.
GrossJ. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291. doi:10.1017/S0048577201393198
23.
GrossJ. J. (2008). Emotion regulation. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.Feldman BarrettL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 497-513). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
HalperinE.PliskinR. (2015). Emotions and emotion regulation in intractable conflict: Studying emotional processes within a unique context. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 119-150. doi:10.1111/pops.12236
26.
JohnsM.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331-348. doi:10.1080/15298860500145822
27.
JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.). (2009). Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.001.0001
28.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007. doi:10.1177/0146167207301028
29.
KleinO.LicataL.PierucciS. (2011). Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 563-572. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02028.x
30.
KronA.SchulY.CohenA.HassinR. R. (2010). Feelings don’t come easy: Studies on the effortful nature of feelings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 520-534. doi:10.1037/a0020008
31.
KruglanskiA. W.BélangerJ. J.ChenX.KöpetzC.PierroA.MannettiL. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119, 1-20. doi:10.1037/a0025488
32.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
33.
LandauM. J.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.PyszczynskiT.ArndtJ.. . . CookA. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136-1150. doi:10.1177/0146167204267988
34.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
35.
LeidnerB.CastanoE. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82-91. doi:10.1002/ejsp.846
36.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.ZaiserE.Giner-SorollaR. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129. doi:10.1177/0146167210376391
37.
LickelB.SteeleR. R.SchmaderT. (2011). Group-based shame and guilt: Emerging directions in research. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 153-163. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00340.x
38.
MaitnerA. T.MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2006). Evidence for the regulatory function of intergroup emotion: Emotional consequences of implemented or impeded intergroup action tendencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 720-728. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.001
39.
MariS.AndrighettoL.GabbiadiniA.DuranteF.VolpatoC. (2010). The shadow of the Italian colonial experience: The impact of collective emotions on intentions to help the victims’ descendants. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 58-74.
40.
McGartyC.PedersenA.LeachC. W.MansellT.WallerJ.BliucA.-M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659-680. doi:10.1348/014466604X18974
41.
MironA. M.BranscombeN. R.BiernatM. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768-779. doi:10.1177/0146167210370031
42.
MironA. M.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163-180. doi:10.1177/1368430206062075
43.
NailP. R.HartonH. C.DeckerB. P. (2003). Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism: Tests of Dovidio and Gaertner’s (1998) integrated model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 754-770. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.754
44.
PackerD. J. (2007). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72. doi:10.1177/1088868307309606
45.
PackerD. J.ChasteenA. L. (2010). Loyal deviance: Testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 5-18. doi:10.1177/0146167209350628
46.
PicaG.PierroA.BélangerJ. J.KruglanskiA. W. (2013). The motivational dynamics of retrieval-induced forgetting: A test of cognitive energetics theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1530-1541. doi:10.1177/0146167213499237
47.
PowellA. A.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2005). Inequality as “ingroup privilege” or “outgroup disadvantage”: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 501-521. doi:10.1177/0146167204271713
48.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
49.
RoetsA.Van HielA.KruglanskiA. W. (2013). When motivation backfires: Optimal levels of motivation as a function of cognitive capacity in information relevance perception and social judgment. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 261-273. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9299-0
50.
SacchiS.CarnaghiA.CastelliniF.ColomboM. (2013). Group merger between political parties: The role of the ingroup projection process. Political Psychology, 34, 91-105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00921.x
51.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175043
52.
TamirM.BigmanY. E.RhodesE.SalernoJ.SchreierJ. (2015). An expectancy-value model of emotion regulation: Implications for motivation, emotional experience, and decision making. Emotion, 15, 90-103. doi:10.1037/emo0000021
53.
TamirM.FordB. Q.GilliamM. (2013). Evidence for utilitarian motives in emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 483-491. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.715079
54.
TangneyJ. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598-607. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.598
55.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
56.
ValdesoloP.DeStenoD. (2008). The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1334-1338. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.010
57.
WrightJ. C.BarilG. (2011). The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1007-1012. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014
58.
ZebelS.ZimmermannA.VikiG. T.DoosjeB. (2008). Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of reparation policies. Political Psychology, 29, 193-219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00623.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
