Two studies investigated how people define and perceive diversity in the historically majority-group dominated contexts of business and academia. We hypothesized that individuals construe diversity as both the numeric representation of racial minorities and the social acceptance of racial minorities within a group. In Study 1, undergraduates’ (especially minorities’) perceptions of campus diversity were predicted by perceived social acceptance on a college campus, above and beyond perceived minority representation. Study 2 showed that increases in a company’s representation and social acceptance independently led to increases in perceived diversity of the company among Whites. Among non-Whites, representation and social acceptance only increased perceived diversity of the company when both qualities were high. Together these findings demonstrate the importance of both representation and social acceptance to the achievement of diversity in groups and that perceiver race influences the relative importance of these two components of diversity.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.PhillipsK. W.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9(3), 235-244. doi:10.1177/1745691614527466
3.
BaumanC. W.TrawalterS.UnzuetaM. M. (2014). Diverse according to whom? Racial group membership and concerns about discrimination shape diversity judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1354-1372.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
5.
BezrukovaK.JehnK. A.ThatcherS.ZanuttoE. (2009). A field study of group faultlines, team identity, conflict, and performance in diverse groups. Organization Science, 20, 35-50.
6.
BinningK. R.UnzuetaM. M. (2013). Perceiving ethnic diversity on campus: Group differences in attention to hierarchical representation. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 500-507. doi:10.1177/1948550612459771
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060.
9.
CoxT. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
EmersonK. T. U.MurphyM. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508-520.
12.
FairbanksE. (2014, October14). A paradox of integration. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/1pltxP7
13.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14.
HamiltonD. L.ChenJ. M.WayN. (2011). Dynamic aspects of entitativity: From group perception to social interaction. In KramerR. M.LeonardelliG. J.LivingstonR. W. (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: A Festschrift in honor of Marilynn Brewer (pp. 27-52). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
16.
HomanA. C.GreerL. L.JehnK. A.KoningL. (2010). Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 477-493.
17.
HuoY. J.BinningK. R.MolinaL. E. (2010). The interplay between fairness and the experience of respect: Implications for group life. In MannixB.NealeM.MullenE. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Fairness in groups (Vol. 13, pp. 95-120). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
18.
IbarraH. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
21.
KriegerL. H. (2007). The watched variable improves: On eliminating sex discrimination in employment. In CrosbyF. J.StockdaleM. S.RoppS. A. (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace (pp. 295-329). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22.
KroschA. R.BerntsenL.AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.Van BavelJ. J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1196-1203. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.009
23.
LearyM. R.KellyK. M.CottrellC. A.SchreindorferL. S. (2013). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment.
24.
MasonW.SuriS. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
25.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91-126). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896-918.
27.
MorelandR. L. (2013). Group composition and diversity. In LevineJ. (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
MorrisonA. M.Von GlinowM. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.
29.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879-885.
30.
O’LearyV. E.IckovicsJ. R. (1992). Cracking the glass ceiling: Overcoming isolation and discrimination. In SekeranU.LeongF. (Eds.), Womanpower: Managing in times of demographic turbulence (pp. 7-30). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31.
PettyR. E.BrinolP.TormalaZ. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.
32.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
33.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 337-353.
34.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ.R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African-Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630.
35.
SommersS. R.NortonM. I. (2006). Lay theories about White racists: What constitutes racism (and what doesn’t). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 117-138.
36.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsT. (2012). A cultural mismatch: Independent cultural norms produce greater increases in cortisol and more negative emotions among first-generation college students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1389-1393.
37.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FitzgeraldD. C.BylsmaW. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38-67.
38.
TapiaA. H.KvasnyL. (2004, May22-24). Recruitment is never enough: Retention of women and minorities in the IT workplace. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference, Tucson, AZ.
39.
TownsendS. S. M.FrybergS. A.WilkinsC. L.MarkusH. R. (2012). Being mixed: Who claims a biracial identity?Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 91-96. doi:10.1037/a0026845
40.
TownsendS. S. M.MajorB.SawyerP. J.MendesW. B. (2010). Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one’s worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 933-947. doi:10.1037/a0020434
41.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity?Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 443-446. doi:10.1037/a0019723
42.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2012). Diversity is in the eye of the beholder: How group interest affects majority and minority group members’ definitions of diversity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 26-38.
43.
UnzuetaM. M.KnowlesE. D.HoG. C. (2012). Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity. Psychological Science, 23, 303-309.
44.
Van KnippenbergD.van GinkelW. P.HomanA. C. (2013). Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 183-193.
45.
Van KnippenbergD.SchippersM. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.
46.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96.
47.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331, 1447-1451.
48.
WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132-1139.
49.
WilliamsK. Y.O’ReillyC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
