Exposure to Racial Out-Groups and Implicit Race Bias in the United States

Abstract

The industrialized world is becoming more ethnically diverse. Research in several disciplines has suggested that exposure to racial out-groups may be associated with more positive and more negative intergroup attitudes. Given that U.S. states are often at the center of debate regarding diversity-related public policy, we examined how exposure to out-groups is associated with state-level implicit and explicit race bias among White and Black Americans. We found that larger proportions of Black residents across U.S. states were associated with stronger implicit and explicit in-group bias among both White and Black respondents. State-level bias was predicted by proportions of Black residents even when controlling for (a) state-level demographic control variables (e.g., median income), (b) proportions of non-Black minorities, and (c) historical membership in the Confederacy. Our results convey the importance of investigating why diversity may not always have the positive impact on intergroup relations that one might hope it to have.

Keywords

intergroup relations race diversity implicit bias Implicit Association Test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alba

Rumbaut

R. G.

Marotz

(2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84, 901–919. doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0002

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Archibold

R. C.

(2010, April 23). Arizona enacts stringent law on immigration. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html?_r=0

Ashburn-Nardo

(2010). The importance of implicit and explicit measures for understanding social stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 508–520. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01659.x

Ayers

J. W.

Hofstetter

C. R.

Schnakenberg

Kolody

(2009). Is immigration a racial issue? Anglo attitudes on immigration policies in a border county. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 593–610. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00633.x

Bobo

(1988). Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In Katz

P. A.

Taylor

D. A.

(Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 85–114). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Chang

M. J.

(1999). Does racial diversity matter?: The educational impact of a racially diverse undergraduate population. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 377–395.

Christ

Schmid

Lolliot

Swart

Stolle

Tausch

… Hewstone

(2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3996–4000. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320901111

Coleman

(2006). Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: A third demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 32, 401–446.

10.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

O’Brien

(2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359

11.

Fazio

R. H.

Olson

M. A.

(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225

12.

Fossett

M. A.

Kiecolt

K. J.

(1989). The relative size of minority populations and white racial attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 820–835.

13.

Graf

Paolini

Rubin

(2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2052

14.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

Nosek

B. A.

(in press). Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

15.

Greenwald

A. G.

McGhee

D. E.

Schwartz

J. L.

(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464

16.

Greenwald

A. G.

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

(2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197

17.

Holloway

S. R.

Wright

Ellis

(2012). The racially fragmented city? Neighborhood racial segregation and diversity jointly considered. The Professional Geographer, 64, 63–82. doi:10.1080/00330124.2011.585080

18.

Iceland

Scopilliti

(2008). Immigrant residential segregation in US metropolitan areas, 1990–2000. Demography, 45, 79–94. doi:10.1353/dem.2008.0009

19.

Karpinski

Hilton

J. L.

(2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774–788. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774

20.

Laurence

(2009). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27, 70–89. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp057

21.

LeVine

R. A.

Campbell

D. T.

(1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.

22.

Livingston

R. W.

(2002). The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans’ implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 405–413. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00002-1

23.

Marini

Sriram

Schnabel

Maliszewski

Devos

Ekehammar

… Nosek

B. A.

(2013). Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PloS ONE, 8, e83543. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083543

24.

Massey

D. S.

Denton

N. A.

(1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281–315. doi:10.1093/sf/67.2.281

25.

Newheiser

Olson

K. R.

(2014). Is the inherence heuristic needed to understand system-justifying tendencies among children? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 496–497. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13003816

26.

Nosek

B. A.

Smyth

F. L.

Hansen

J. J.

Devos

Lindner

N. M.

Ranganath

K. A.

… Banaji

M. R.

(2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053

27.

Nosek

B. A.

Smyth

F. L.

Sriram

Lindner

N. M.

Devos

Ayala

… Greenwald

A. G.

(2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106

28.

Page

S. E.

(2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Pearson

A. R.

Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 314–338. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00183.x

30.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1959). Regional differences in anti-negro prejudice. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 28–36.

31.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

32.

Prestwich

Kenworthy

J. B.

Wilson

Kwan-Tat

(2008). Differential relations between two types of contact and implicit and explicit racial attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 575–588. doi:10.1348/014466607X267470

33.

Putnam

R. D.

(2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x

34.

Riek

B. M.

Mania

E. W.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4

35.

Rudman

L. A.

(2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79–82. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x

36.

Quillian

(1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611. doi:10.2307/2096296

37.

Shelton

J. N.

(2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 374–390. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_6

38.

Sigelman

Welch

(1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71, 781–795. doi:10.2307/2579895

39.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632

40.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

41.

Stephens-Davidowitz

S. I.

(2013). The cost of racial animus on a black presidential candidate: Using Google search data to find what surveys miss. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2238851

42.

Taylor

M. C.

(1998). How White attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512–535. doi:10.2307/2657265

43.

Tetlock

P. E.

Mitchell

(2009). Implicit bias and accountability systems: What must organizations do to prevent discrimination? Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 3–38. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.002

44.

Turner

R. N.

Hewstone

Voci

(2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369

45.

Wagner

Christ

Pettigrew

T. F.

Stellmacher

Wolf

(2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 380–390. doi:10.1177/019027250606900406

46.

Wagner

Van Dick

Pettigrew

T. F.

Christ

(2003). Ethnic prejudice in East and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 22–36. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001010

47.

Nosek

B. A.

Greenwald

A. G.

(2014). Psychology data from the race Implicit Association Test on the Project Implicit demo website. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2, e3. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jopd.ac

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.43 MB

0.00 MB