The Girls Set the Tone

Abstract

In a four-wave longitudinal study with N = 1,321 adolescents in Germany, we examined the impact of class-level normative beliefs about aggression on aggressive norms and behavior at the individual level over the course of 3 years. At each data wave, participants indicated their normative acceptance of aggressive behavior and provided self-reports of physical and relational aggression. Multilevel analyses revealed significant cross-level interactions between class-level and individual-level normative beliefs at T1 on individual differences in physical aggression at T2, and the indirect interactive effects were significant up to T4. Normative approval of aggression at the class level, especially girls’ normative beliefs, defined the boundary conditions for the expression of individual differences in aggressive norms and their impact on physically and relationally aggressive behavior for both girls and boys. The findings demonstrate the moderating effect of social norms on the pathways from individual normative beliefs to aggressive behavior in adolescence.

Keywords

aggression normative beliefs adolescence class-level effects multilevel modelling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguinis

Gottfredson

R. K.

Culpepper

S. A.

(2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490-1528. doi:10.1177/0149206313478188

Archer

Coyne

S. M.

(2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212-230. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2

Benson

M. J.

Buehler

(2012). Family process and peer deviance influences on adolescent aggression: Longitudinal effects across early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 83, 1213-1228. doi:10.1037/t05714-000

Bernburg

J. G.

Thorlindsson

(2005). Violent values, conduct norms, and youth aggression: A multilevel study in Iceland. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 457-478. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00022.x

Björkqvist

Österman

Kaukiainen

(1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In Björkqvist

Niemelä

(Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Bonell

Wells

Harden

Jamal

Fletcher

Thomas

. . . Moore

(2013). The effects on student health of interventions modifying the school environment: Systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 67, 677-681. doi:10.1136/jech-2012-202247

Brechwald

W. A.

Prinstein

M. J.

(2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x

Brendgen

Girard

Vitaro

Dionne

Boivin

(2015). Gene-environment correlation linking aggression and peer victimization: Do classroom behavioral norms matter? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 19-31. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9807-z

Chang

(2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691-702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691

10.

Cialdini

R. B.

Reno

R. R.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

11.

Coley

R. L.

Lombardi

C. M.

Lynch

A. D.

Mahalik

J. R.

Sims

(2013). Sexual partner accumulation from adolescence through early adulthood: The role of family, peer, and school social norms. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 91-97. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.005

12.

Crick

N. R.

Dodge

K. A.

(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

13.

Dishion

T. J.

Tipsord

J. M.

(2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189-214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412

14.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121-138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

15.

Farrell

A. D.

Henry

D. B.

Mays

S. A.

Schoeny

M. E.

(2011). Parents as moderators of the impact of school norms and peer influences on aggression in middle school students. Child Development, 82, 146-161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01546.x

16.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202

17.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2007). Social multipliers in sexual initiation decisions among U.S. high schools. Demography, 44, 373-388. doi:10.1353/dem.2007.0009

18.

Fontaine

R. G.

Dodge

K. A.

(2009). Social information processing and aggressive behavior: A transactional perspective. In Sameroff

(Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other (pp. 117-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

19.

Hahn

Fuqua-Whitley

Wethington

Lowy

Crosby

Fullilove

. . . Dahlberg

(2007). Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and aggressive behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, S114-S129. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.012

20.

Hedges

L. V.

Hedberg

E. C.

(2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87. doi:10.2307/30128045

21.

Henry

D. B.

(2013). The moderating role of developmental microsystems in selective preventive intervention effects on aggression and victimization of aggressive and socially-influential students. Prevention Science, 14, 390-399. doi:10.1007/s11121-012-0303-4

22.

Henry

D. B.

Farrell

A. D.

Schoeny

M. E.

Tolan

P. H.

Dymnicki

A. B.

(2011). Influence of school-level variables on aggression and associated attitudes of middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 481-503. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.007

23.

Henry

D. B.

Guerra

Huesmann

L. R.

Tolan

VanAcker

Eron

(2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725

24.

Hox

J. J.

Van De Schoot

Matthijsse

(2012). How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Survey Research Methods, 6, 87-93.

25.

Huesmann

L. R.

(1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13-24. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:1<13::AID-AB2480140104>3.0.CO;2-J

26.

Huesmann

L. R.

Guerra

N. G.

(1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408-419. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408

27.

Isaacs

Voeten

Salmivalli

(2013). Gender-specific or common classroom norms? Examining the contextual moderators of the risk for victimization. Social Development, 22, 555-579. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00655.x

28.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Peterson

Z. D.

(2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 517-523. doi 10.1080/00224499.2012.700739

29.

Kikas

Peets

Tropp

Hinn

(2009). Associations between verbal reasoning, normative beliefs about aggression, and different forms of aggression. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 137-149. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00586.x

30.

Krahé

(2013). The social psychology of aggression (2nd ed.). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

31.

Low

Polanin

J. R.

Espelage

D. L.

(2013). The role of social networks in physical and relational aggression among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1078-1089. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9933-5

32.

Lüdtke

Marsh

H. W.

Robitzsch

Trautwein

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203-229. doi:10.1037/a0012869

33.

Mercer

S. H.

McMillen

J. S.

DeRosier

M. E.

(2009). Predicting change in children’s aggression and victimization using classroom-level descriptive norms of aggression and pro-social behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 267-289. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.001

34.

Möller

Krahé

(2009). Exposure to violent video games and aggression in German adolescents: A longitudinal analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 75-89. doi:10.1002/ab.20290

35.

Moscovici

Lage

Naffrechoux

(1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380. doi:10.2307/2786541

36.

Mrug

McCay

(2013). Parental and peer disapproval of alcohol use and its relationship to adolescent drinking: Age, gender, and racial differences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 604-614. doi:10.1037/a0031064

37.

Muthén

Asparouhov

(2009). Beyond multilevel regression modeling: Multilevel analysis in a general latent variable framework. In Hox

J. J.

Roberts

J. K.

(Eds.), The handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 15-40). London, England: Taylor & Francis.

38.

Paccagnella

(2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66-85. doi:10.1177/0193841X05275649

39.

Paternoster

McGloin

J. M.

Nguyen

Thomas

K. J.

(2013). The causal impact of exposure to deviant peers: An experimental investigation. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 476-503. doi:10.1177/0022427812444274

40.

Preacher

K. J.

Zyphur

M. J.

Zhang

(2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233. doi:10.1037/a0020141

41.

Raudenbush

Bryk

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

42.

Salmivalli

Voeten

(2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258. doi:10.1080/01650250344000488

43.

Vitaro

Boivin

Tremblay

R. E.

(2007). Peers and violence: A two sided developmental perspective. In Flannery

D. J.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

Waldman

I. D.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 361-387). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Warren

Schoppelrey

Moberg

D. P.

McDonald

(2005). A model of contagion through competition in the aggressive behaviors of elementary school students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 283-292. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3565-5

45.

Werner

N. E.

Hill

L. G.

(2010). Individual and peer group normative beliefs about relational aggression. Child Development, 81, 826-836. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01436.x

46.

Werner

N. E.

Nixon

C. L.

(2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 229-243. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-4306-3

47.

Wright

J. C.

Giammarino

Parad

H. W.

(1986). Social status in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social “misfit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523-536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523

48.

Yarnell

L. M.

Pasch

K. E.

Brown

H. S.

Perry

C. L.

Komro

K. A.

(2014). Cross-gender social normative effects for violence in middle school: Do girls carry a social multiplier effect for at-risk boys? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1465-1485. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0104-0

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

0.06 MB