Shared Perceptions

Abstract

Morality helps make social life possible, but social life is embedded in many social contexts. Research on morality has generally neglected this and instead has emphasized people’s general beliefs. We therefore investigated the extent to which different moral principles are perceived as embedded in social contexts. We conducted two studies investigating how diverse social contexts influence beliefs about the operative moral principles in distinct group types. Study 1 examined these perceptions using a within-subjects design, whereas Study 2 utilized a between-subjects design. We found a high degree of consensus among raters concerning the operative moral principles in groups, and each group type was characterized by a qualitatively distinct pattern of applicable moral principles. Political orientation, a focus of past research on morality, had a small influence on beliefs about operative moral principles. The implications of these findings for our understanding of morality and its functional role in groups are discussed.

Keywords

morality group types politics social context

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brickman

Folger

Goode

Schul

(1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner

M. J.

Lerner

S. C.

(Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 173-202). New York, NY: Plenum.

Cialdini

R. B.

Reno

R. R.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.

Clark

M. S.

Mills

(1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.

Cottrell

C. A.

Neuberg

S. L.

(2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789.

Cottrell

C. A.

Neuberg

S. L.

N. P.

(2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208-231.

de Waal

F. B. M.

(1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fiske

A. P.

(1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

(2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.

10.

Haidt

(2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002.

11.

Haidt

(2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65-72.

12.

Haidt

(2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

13.

Haidt

Graham

(2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.

14.

Haidt

Joseph

(2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55-66.

15.

Haidt

Joseph

(2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In Carruthers

Laurence

Stich

(Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367-391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

16.

Haidt

Kesebir

(2010). Morality. In Fiske

Gilbert

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797-832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

17.

Haslam

(1994). Categories of social relationship. Cognition, 53, 59-90.

18.

Haslam

Rothschild

Ernst

(2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.

19.

Haslam

Rothschild

Ernst

(2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87-100.

20.

Hong

Y. Y.

Levy

S. R.

Chiu

C. Y.

(2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 98-106.

21.

Janoff-Bulman

(2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120-128.

22.

Janoff-Bulman

Carnes

N. C.

(2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236.

23.

Janoff-Bulman

Sheikh

Baldacci

K. G.

(2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1091-1099.

24.

Janoff-Bulman

Sheikh

Hepp

(2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 521-537.

25.

Johnson

A. L.

Crawford

M. T.

Sherman

S. J.

Rutchick

A. M.

Hamilton

D. L.

Ferreira

M. B.

Petrocelli

J. V.

(2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 707-719.

26.

Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

(2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In Fiske

Gilbert

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

27.

Lickel

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

S. J.

(2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 129-140.

28.

Lickel

Hamilton

D. L.

Wieczorkowska

Lewis

Sherman

S. J.

Uhles

A. N.

(2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.

29.

Lickel

Rutchick

A. M.

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

S. J.

(2006). Intuitive theories of group types and relational principles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 28-39.

30.

Neuberg

S. L.

Cottrell

C. A.

(2008). Managing the threats and opportunities afforded by human sociality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 63-72.

31.

Parks

C. D.

Joireman

Van Lange

P. A.

(2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: How public goods are promoted. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119-165.

32.

Prentice

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.

33.

Rai

T. S.

Fiske

A. P.

(2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75.

34.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

35.

Richerson

P. J.

Boyd

(2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB