This research introduces low goal ambivalence as a relevant correlate of goal self-concordance. In three studies, we tested the hypothesis that university freshmen’s ambivalence toward the goal of completing their degree mediates the effect of goal self-concordance on subjective well-being. In Studies 1 and 2, differences in goal ambivalence accounted for effects of goal self-concordance on concurrent life satisfaction and affect at the end of the freshman year. Study 3 evidenced a longitudinal mediation effect of goal ambivalence on 1-year post-entry increases in life and study satisfaction, which were explained through perceptions of goal progress at the end of the freshman year. Decomposing self-concordance into autonomous and controlled motivation revealed non-redundant parallel effects for both subcomponents. These results point to ambivalence as a significant experience in goal pursuit and suggest that it represents an additional explanatory variable in the self-concordance model of goal striving and longitudinal well-being.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2.
ArmitageC. J.ArdenM. A. (2007). Felt and potential ambivalence across the stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 149-158.
3.
BaumannN.KaschelR.KuhlJ. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781-799.
4.
BellD. W.EssesV. M. (2002). Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1143-1152.
5.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554-571.
6.
BrunsteinJ. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061-1070.
7.
ByrneB. M. (Ed.). (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CarraroN.GaudreauP. (2011). Implementation planning as a pathway between goal motivation and goal progress for academic and physical activity goals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1835-1856.
9.
ContiR. (2000). College goals: Do self-determined and carefully considered goals predict intrinsic motivation, academic performance, and adjustment during the first semester?Social Psychology of Education, 4, 189-211.
10.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
14.
EmmonsR. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058-1068.
15.
EmmonsR. A.CheungC.TehraniK. (1998). Assessing spirituality through personal goals: Implications for research on religion and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 45, 391-422.
16.
EmmonsR. A.KingL. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040-1048.
17.
EmmonsR. A.KingL. A.SheldonK. M. (1993). Goal conflict and the self-regulation of action. In WegnerD. M.PennebakerJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 528-551). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
GaudreauP.CarraroN.MirandaD. (2012). From goal motivation to goal progress: The mediating role of coping in the Self-Concordance Model. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 25, 507-528.
19.
GawronskiB.StrackF. (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
GrahamJ. W.OlchowskiA. E.GilreathT. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206-213.
Harmon-JonesE.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesC. (2009). Action-based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 119-166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HerrmannM.BrandstätterV. (2013). Overcoming action crises in personal goals—Longitudinal evidence on a mediating mechanism between action orientation and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 881-893.
25.
HiemischA.WestermannR.MichaelA. (2005). Die Abhängigkeit der Zufriedenheit mit dem Medizinstudium von Studienzielen und ihrer Realisierbarkeit [Association of medicine students’ satisfaction with study goals and their feasibility]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213(2), 97-108.
26.
HigginsE. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209-213.
27.
JonasK.BroemerP.DiehlM. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 35-74.
28.
KasperzackD.ErnstA. L.PinquartM. (2014). Ambivalence during and after career decision making of high school graduates. Journal of Career Assessment, 22, 248-260.
29.
KellyR. E.WoodA. M.ShearmanK.PhillipsS.MansellW. (2012). Encouraging acceptance of ambivalence using the expressive writing paradigm. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85, 220-228.
30.
KoestnerR.LekesN.PowersT. A.ChicoineE. (2002). Attaining personal goals: Self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 231-244.
31.
KoestnerR.LosierG.VallerandR. J.CarducciD. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1025-1036.
32.
KoestnerR.OtisN.PowersT. A.PelletierL.GagnonH. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76, 1201-1230.
33.
KruglanskiA. W.PierroA.MannettiL.HigginsT. E. (2013). The distinct psychologies of “looking” and “leaping”: Assessment and locomotion as the springs of action. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 79-92.
34.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashM. N.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.
35.
LevesqueC.ZuehlkeA. N.StanekL. R.RyanR. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 68-84.
36.
MarklandD.RyanR. M.TobinV. J.RollnickS. (2005). Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 24, 811-831.
37.
McArdleJ. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577-605.
38.
MichalakJ.HeidenreichT.HoyerJ. (2004). Goal conflicts: Concepts, findings, and consequences for psychotherapy. In CoxW. M.KlingerE. (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 83-98). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
39.
MyrsethK. O. R.FishbachA. (2009). Self-control: A function of knowing when and how to exercise restraint. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 247-252.
40.
Newby-ClarkI. R.McGregorI.ZannaM. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157-166.
41.
NiemiecC. P.LynchM. F.VansteenkisteM.BernsteinJ.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of autonomous self-regulation for college: A self-determination theory perspective on socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 761-775.
42.
PierroA.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2006). Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: Effects of “locomotion” and “assessment” on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. European Journal of Personality, 20, 355-375.
43.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115.
44.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.
45.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 19-34.
46.
PruessnerJ. C.KirschbaumC.MeinlschmidG.HellhammerD. H. (2003). Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 916-931.
47.
RikettaM.ZieglerR. (2007). Self-ambivalence and reactions to success versus failure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 547-560.
48.
RomeroE.VillarP.LuengoM. A.Gomez-FraguelaJ. A. (2009). Traits, personal strivings and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 535-546.
49.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
50.
SchülerJ.JobV.FröhlichS. M.BrandstätterV. (2009). Dealing with a “hidden stressor”: Emotional disclosure as a coping strategy to overcome the negative effects of motive incongruence on health. Stress & Health, 25, 221-233.
51.
SellinI.SchützA.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2003). Erfassung von Dimensionen der Selbstregulation. Der Locomotion-Assessment-Fragebogen (L-A-F) [Assessing dimensions of self-regulation. The Locomotion and Assessment Questionnaire (L-A-Q)]. Chemnitz, Germany: Technische Universität, Philosophische Fakultät.
52.
SheldonK. M. (2002). The self-concordance model of healthy goal-striving: When personal goals correctly represent the person. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 65-86). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
53.
SheldonK. M. (2008). The interface of motivational science and personology: Self-concordance, quality motivation, and multi-level personality integration. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 465-476). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546-557.
55.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482-497.
56.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J.RyanR. M.ChirkovV.KimY.WuC.. . .SunZ. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 209-223.
57.
SheldonK. M.KasserT. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531-543.
58.
SheldonK. M.KasserT. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1319-1331.
59.
SheldonK. M.SchülerJ. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1106-1123.
60.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
61.
SincoffJ. B. (1990). The psychological characteristics of ambivalent people. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 43-68.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64.
TweneyR. D. (2013). Reflections on regression towards the mean. Theory & Psychology, 23, 271-274.
65.
van HarreveldF.van der PligtJ.de LiverY. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45-61.
66.
VansteenkisteM.SheldonK. M. (2006). There’s nothing more practical than a good theory: Integrating motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 63-82.
67.
VasalampiK.Salmela-AroK.NurmiJ.-E. (2009). Adolescents’ self-concordance, school engagement, and burnout predict their educational trajectories. European Psychologist, 14, 332-341.
68.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
69.
WilderJ. (1957). The law of initial value in neurology and psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 125, 73-86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
