The current study analyzes data from a national probability panel sample of New Zealanders (N = 5,091) to examine stability and change in political orientation over four consecutive yearly assessments (2009-2012) following the 2007/2008 global financial crisis. Bayesian Latent Growth Modeling identified systematic variation in the growth trajectory of conservatism that was predicted by age and socio-economic status. Younger people (ages 25-45) did not change in their political orientation. Older people, however, became more conservative over time. Likewise, people with lower socio-economic status showed a marked increase in political conservatism. In addition, tests of rank-order stability showed that age had a cubic relationship with the stability of political orientation over our four annual assessments. Our findings provide strong support for System Justification Theory by showing that increases in conservatism in the wake of the recent global financial crisis occurred primarily among the poorest and most disadvantaged.
AlfordJ. R.FunkC. J.HibbingJ. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?The American Political Science Review, 99, 153-167.
2.
AlwinD. F.CohenR. L.NewcombT. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span: The Bennington Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
AlwinD. F.KrosnickJ. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 169-195. doi:10.1086/229744
4.
BrandtM. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765-785. doi:10.1037/a0031751
5.
ConoverP. J.FeldmanS. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645. doi:10.2307/2110756
6.
CramptonP.SalmondC.WoodwardA.ReidP. (2000). Socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity are both important for anti-tobacco health promotion. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 317-327.
7.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699-724.
9.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.RubinD. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
10.
HatemiP. K.FunkC. L.MedlandS. E.MaesH. M.SilbergJ. L.MartinN. G.EavesL. J. (2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. Journal of Politics, 71, 1141-1156. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090938
11.
JenningsM. K.MarkusG. B. (1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. American Political Science Review, 78, 1000-1018. doi:10.2307/1955804
12.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false ocnscientiousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
13.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
14.
JostT. J.BurgessD.MossoC. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In JostJ.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 363-390). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
JostJ. T.Chaikalis-PetritsisV.AbramsD.SidaniusJ.van der ToornJ.BrattC. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197-208. doi:10.1177/0146167211422544
16.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337.
17.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.
18.
JostJ.HunyadyO. (2005). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
19.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
20.
JostT. J.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.Ni SullivanB. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
21.
KrosnickJ. A.AlwinD. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 416-425. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.416
22.
KruschkeJ. K.AguinisH.JooH. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 722-752.
23.
MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2014). The stability of adult personality varies across age: Evidence from a two-year longitudinal sample of adult New Zealanders. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 29-37. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.04.005
24.
NewcombT. M. (1965). Attitude development as a function of reference groups: The Bennington Study. In ProshanskyH. M.SeidenbergB. (Eds.), Basic studies in social psychology (pp. 215-225). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
25.
OsborneD.HuoY. J.SmithH. J. (2014). Organizational respect dampens the impact of group-based relative deprivation on willingness to protest pay cuts. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjso.12069. Advance online publication.
26.
OsborneD.SearsD. O.ValentinoN. A. (2011). The end of the solidly Democratic South: The impressionable-years hypothesis. Political Psychology, 32, 81-108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00796.x
27.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991-1004. doi:10.1177/0146167213487997
28.
SalmondC.CramptonP. (2012). Development of New Zealand’s deprivation index (NZDep) and its uptake as a national policy tool. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103, 7-11.
29.
SalmondC.CramptonP. (2000). Deprivation and health. In Howden-ChapmanP.TobiasM. (Eds.), Social inequalities in health: New Zealand 1999 (pp. 9-63). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.
30.
SalmondC.CramptonP.AtkinsonJ. (2007). NZDep2006 Index of Deprivation. Wellington. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington.
31.
SearsD. O.FunkC. L. (1999). Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions. Journal of Politics, 61, 1-28. doi:10.2307/2647773
32.
SibleyC. G. (2010). The dark duo of post-colonial ideology: A model of symbolic exclusion and historical negation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 106-123.
33.
SibleyC. G.HarréN.HoverdW. J.HoukamauC. A. (2011). The gap in the subjective wellbeing of Māori and New Zealand Europeans widened between 2005 and 2009. Social Indicators Research, 104(1), 103-115.
34.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchies and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
VisserP. S.KrosnickJ. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: Surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1389-1410. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1389
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
