This study tested for inter-judge agreement on moral character. A sample of students and community members rated their own moral character using a measure that tapped six moral character traits. Friends, family members, and/or acquaintances rated these targets on the same traits. Self/other and inter-informant agreement was found at the trait level for both a general character factor and for residual variance explained by individual moral character traits, as well as at the individual level (judges agreed on targets’ “moral character profiles”). Observed inter-judge agreement constitutes evidence for the existence of moral character, and raises questions about the nature of moral character traits.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO-PI-R self- and observer reports. European Journal of Personality, 24, 278-289.
3.
BiesanzJ. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885.
4.
BiesanzJ. C.WestS. G.MillevoiA. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119-135.
5.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194-1198.
6.
CloningerR.PrzybeckT. R.SvrakicD. M.WetzelR. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality.
7.
CohenT. R.PanterA. T.TuranN.MorseL.KimY. (2013). Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 816-830.
8.
DarleyJ. M.BatsonC. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-108.
9.
DorisJ. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.
11.
FleesonW.FurrR. M.JayawickremeE.MeindlP.HelzerE. G. (2014). Character: The prospects for a personality-based perspective on morality. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 178-191.
12.
FrimerJ. A.BiesanzJ. C.WalkerL. J.MacKinlayC. W. (2013). Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1040-1059.
13.
FrimerJ. A.WalkerL. J.LeeB. H.RichesA.DunlopW. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80, 1117-1145.
14.
FunderD. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48, 473-493.
15.
FunderD. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
16.
FunderD. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
17.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
18.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1997). Congruence of others’ and self-judgments of personality. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 617-647). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316.
20.
FurrR. M. (2009). Profile analysis in person-situation integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 196-207.
21.
FurrR. M. (2010). The double-entry intraclass correlation as an index of profile similarity: Meaning, problems, and alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 1-15.
22.
FurrR. M.DoughertyD. M.MarshD. M.MathiasC. W. (2007). Personality judgment and personality pathology: Self-other agreement in adolescents with conduct disorder. Journal of Personality, 75, 629-662.
23.
FurrR. M.WoodD. (2013). On the similarity between exchangeable profiles: A psychometric model, analytic strategy, and empirical illustration. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 233-247.
24.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148-168.
25.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
26.
HaneyC.BanksW.ZimbardoP. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics of a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
27.
HarmanG. (2000). The nonexistence of character traits. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: New series (Vol. 100, pp. 223-226). New York, NY: Blackwell.
28.
HarmanG. (2003). No character or personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 87-94.
29.
HarmanG. (2009). Skepticism about character traits. The Journal of Ethics, 13, 235-242.
30.
HartshorneH.MayM. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. New York, NY: Macmillan.
31.
HaselhuhnM. P.WongE. M. (2012). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 571-576.
32.
JayawickremeE.MeindlP.HelzerE. G.FurrR. M.FleesonW. (2014). Virtuous states and virtuous traits: How the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad saves virtue ethics from the situationist critique. Theory and Research in Education. doi:10.1177/1477878514545206
33.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
34.
KammrathL. K.Mendoza-DentonR.MischelW. (2005). Incorporating If . . . Then . . . personality signatures in person perception: Beyond the person-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 605-618.
35.
KendrickD. T.FunderD. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
36.
KennyD. A.KashyD.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
KennyD. A.WestT. V. (2010). Similarity and agreement in self- and other perception: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 196-213.
38.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339.
39.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
40.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.PozzebonJ. A.VisserB. A.BourdageJ. S.OgunfoworaB. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460-472.
41.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
42.
MillerC. B. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic bias in self-perceptions: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 2024-1060.
44.
PizarroD. A.TannenbaumD. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91-108). New York, NY: APA Press.
45.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349-354.
46.
StrohmingerN.NicholsS. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159-171.
47.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
49.
TenneyE. R.VazireS.MehlM. R. (2013). This examined life: The upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships. PLoS ONE, 8, e69605. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069605
50.
van’t WoutM.SanfeyA. G. (2008). Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108, 796-803.
51.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300.
52.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 605-620.
53.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263.
54.
WoodD.NyeC. D.SaucierG. (2010). Identification and measurement of a more comprehensive set of person-descriptive trait markers from the English lexicon. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 258-272.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
