We investigate the self-evaluative function of competence-related gossip for individuals who receive it. Using the Self-Concept Enhancing Tactician (SCENT) model, we propose that individuals use evaluative information about others (i.e., gossip) to improve, promote, and protect themselves. Results of a critical incident study and an experimental study showed that positive gossip had higher self-improvement value than negative gossip, whereas negative gossip had higher self-promotion value and raised higher self-protection concerns than positive gossip. Self-promotion mediated the relationship between gossip valence and pride, while self-protection mediated the relationship between gossip valence and fear, although the latter mediated relationship emerged for receivers with mastery goals rather than performance goals. These results suggest that gossip serves self-evaluative functions for gossip receivers and triggers self-conscious emotions.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2012). Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion, 12, 1004-1014. doi:10.1037/a0027358
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
3.
BaumeisterR. F.ZhangL.VohsK. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111-121. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111
4.
BeersmaB.Van KleefG. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 642-649. doi:10.1177/1948550611405073
5.
Ben-Ze’evA. (1994). The vindication of gossip. In GoodmanR. F.Ben-Ze’evA. (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 11-24). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
6.
BollenK. A.JackmanR. W. (1990). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In FoxJ.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Modern methods of data analysis (pp. 257-291). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
7.
BossonJ. K.JohnsonA. B.NiederhofferK.SwannW. B.Jr. (2006). Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others. Personal Relationships, 13, 135-150. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00109.x
8.
BrownJ. D. (1998). The self. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
BrownJ. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives still matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209-219. doi:10.1177/0146167211432763
10.
BurtR. S. (2008). Gossip and reputation. In LecoutreM.LièvreP. (Eds.), Management Et Réseaux Sociaux: Ressource Pour L’action Ou Outil de Gestion? (pp. 27-42). Paris, France: Hermès Science.
11.
CleggS. R.Van ItersonA. (2009). Dishing the dirt: Gossiping in organizations. Culture and Organization, 15, 275-289. doi:10.1080/14759550903119293
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
13.
DunbarR. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100-110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100
14.
DunbarR. I. M.DuncanN. D. C.MarriottA. (1997). Human conversational behaviour. Human Nature, 8, 231-246. doi:10.1007/BF02912493
15.
ElliotA. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.218
17.
EllwardtL.LabiancaJ.WittekR. P. M. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34, 193-205. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.003
18.
EmlerN. (1994). Gossip, reputation and social adaptation. In GoodmanR.Ben-Ze’evA. (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 117-133). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
19.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
20.
FeinbergM.WillerR.StellarJ.KeltnerD. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1015-1030. doi:10.1037/a0026650
21.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
22.
FosterE. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8, 78-99. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78
23.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.Ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
24.
GoodmanR. F.Ben-Ze’evA. (1994). Good gossip. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
25.
GreenJ. D.SedikidesC.PinterB.Van TongerenD. R. (2009). Two sides to self-protection: Self-improvement strivings and feedback from close others attenuate mnemic neglect. Self and Identity, 8, 233-250. doi:10.1080/15298860802505145
26.
GreggA. P.HepperE. G. D.SedikidesC. (2011). Quantifying self-motives: Functional links between dispositional desires. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 840-852. doi:10.1002/ejsp.827
27.
GrosserT. J.Lopez-KidwellV.LabiancaG. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 35, 177-212. doi:10.1177/1059601109360391
KniffinK. M.WilsonD. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels. Human Nature, 16, 278-292. doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6
30.
KniffinK. M.WilsonD. S. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group & Organization Management, 35, 150-176. doi:10.1177/1059601109360390
31.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480
32.
LearyM. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085658
33.
LitmanJ. A.PezzoM. V. (2005). Individual differences in attitudes towards gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 963-980. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.003
34.
LockwoodP.KundaZ. (2000). Outstanding role models: Do they inspire or demoralize us? In TesserA.FelsonR. B. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 147-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10357-006
35.
McAndrewF. T.BellE. K.GarciaC. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1562-1577.
36.
MichelsonG.Van ItersonA.WaddingtonK. (2010). Gossip in organizations: Contexts, consequences and controversies. Group & Organization Management, 3, 371-390. doi:10.1177/1059601109360389
37.
NevoO.NevoB.Derech-ZehaviA. (1994). The tendency to gossip as a psychological disposition: Constructing a measure and validating it. In GoodmanR. F.Ben-Ze’evA. (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 180-189). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
38.
ÖhmanA. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information processing mechanisms. In LewisM.HavilandJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 511-536). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
PaineR. (1967). What is gossip about? An alternate hypothesis. Man: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, 278-285. doi:10.2307/2799493
40.
PoortvlietP. M.GiebelsE. (2012). Self-improvement and cooperation: How exchange relationships promote mastery approach driven individuals’ job outcomes. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 21, 392-425. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.555080
41.
PoortvlietP. M.JanssenO.Van YperenN. W.Van de VliertE. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1435-1447. doi:10.1177/0146167207305536
42.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
43.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.ArndtJ.SchimelJ. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435-468. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
44.
ReynoldsR. E.AndersonR. C. (1982). Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 623-632. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.623
45.
RobinsR. W.BeerJ. S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 340-352. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.2.340
46.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102-116. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x
47.
SedikidesC.SkowronskiJ. J. (2000). On the evolutionary functions of the symbolic self: The emergence of self-evaluation motives. In TesserA.FelsonR.SulsJ. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 91-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48.
SedikidesC.StrubeM. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209-269). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
49.
SijbomR. B. L.JanssenO.Van YperenN. W. (2014). How to get radical creative ideas into a leader’s mind? Leader’s achievement goals and subordinates’ voice of creative ideas. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.892480
50.
SommerfeldR. D.KrambeckH.SemmannD.MilinskiM. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17435-17440. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704598104
51.
SulsJ. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27, 164-168. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01812.x
52.
TangneyJ. P. (2003). Self-relevant emotions. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 384-400). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 21-27. doi:10.1037/00332909.116.1.21
54.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York, NY: Academic Press.
55.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 103-125. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01
56.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule–Expanded Form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
57.
WaymentH. A.TaylorS. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: Motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 63, 729-757. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00315.x
58.
WeberB.HertelG. (2007). Motivation gains of inferior group members: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 973-993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.973
59.
WertS. R.SaloveyP. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8, 122-137. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.122
60.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
61.
YeoG.LoftS.XiaoT.KiewitzC. (2009). Goal orientations and performance: Differential relationships across levels of analysis and as a function of task demands. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 710-726. doi:10.1037/a0015044
62.
YinonY.BizmanA.YagilD. (1989). Self-evaluation, maintenance and the motivation to interact. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 475-486. doi:10.1177/0265407589064006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
