Conversations are susceptible to many disturbances: A speaker’s hesitations, distractions, or, when communicating online, technical hiccups that may cause brief delays. Research among previously unacquainted individuals revealed that brief disruptions in conversational flow can have profound social consequences: Silences or delays in mediated communication threaten the need to belong and validate one’s ideas. The present research, however, shows that when occurring in close relationships, flow disruptions may be ironically beneficial. We hypothesized that when flow disruptions occur, partners fall back on their relationship beliefs to infer mutual agreement and the existence of a shared reality. When a relationship is perceived as secure, partners may believe that “no words are needed” to understand each other. Flow disruptions can thus paradoxically make shared cognitions accessible and foster feelings of social validation. Data from two experiments, using partners in different types of relationships, supported this hypothesis.
AcitelliL. K.DouvanE.VeroffJ. (1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
3.
BergerC. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In GilesH.St. ClairR. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
4.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
5.
BergerP.KellnerH. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge. Diogenes, 12(46), 1-24.
6.
CappellaJ. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult–adult and infant–adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101-132. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.89.1.101
7.
ChappleE. D. (1971). Experimental production of transients in human interaction. Nature, 228, 630-633. doi:10.1038/228630a0
8.
ClarkH. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
10.
DavisJ. L.RusbultC. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 65-84.
11.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.LevineJ. M. (2009). Shared reality experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496-521.
12.
FinkenauerC.RighettiF. (2011). Understanding in close relationships: An interpersonal approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 316-363.
13.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
14.
GilesH.CouplandN. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
HardinC. D.ConleyT. D. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 3-17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In SorrentinoR.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
IckesW.SimpsonJ. A. (1997). Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218-250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
IckesW.SimpsonJ. A. (2001). Motivational aspects of empathic accuracy. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook in social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 229-249). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
JeffersonG. (1986). Notes on “latency” in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 153-183.
20.
KashimaY.KleinO.ClarkA. E. (2007). Grounding: Sharing information in social interaction. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 27-77). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
21.
KoudenburgN.PostmesTGordijnE. H. (2011a). Disrupting the flow: How brief silences in group conversations affect social needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 512-515. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.00
22.
KoudenburgN.PostmesTGordijnE. H. (2011b). If they were to vote, they would vote for us. Psychological Science, 22, 1506-1510. doi:10.1177/0956797611420164
23.
KoudenburgN.PostmesT.GordijnE. H. (2013a). Conversational flow promotes social unity. PloS ONE, 8, Article e78363. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078363
24.
KoudenburgN.PostmesTGordijnE. H. (2013b). Resounding silences: Subtle norm regulation in group interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76, 224-241. doi:10.1177/0190272513496794
25.
KoudenburgN.PostmesTGordijnE. H. (2014). Conversational flow and entitativity: The role of status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 350-366. doi:10.1111/bjso.12027
26.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889-922.
27.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W.DoldermanD. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563-581.
28.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
29.
PearsonA. R.WestT. V.DovidioJ. F.BuckR.HenningR.PowersS. R. (2008). The fragility of intergroup relations: Divergent effects of temporal delay in audio-visual feedback in intergroup and intragroup interaction. Psychological Science, 19, 1272-1279.
30.
PollmannM. M. H.FinkenauerC. (2009). Investigating the role of two types of understanding in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1512-1527.
31.
PostmesT.HaslamS. A.SwaabR. I. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
32.
PostmesT.SpearsR. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
33.
PostmesT.SpearsR.LeaM. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
34.
PostmesT.SpearsR.LeeA. T.NovakR. J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
35.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
36.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
37.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
38.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367-389). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
40.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
41.
SchegloffE. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SillarsA. L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In IckesW. J. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277-305). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
43.
SmithL. G. E.PostmesT. (2011). The power of talk: Developing discriminatory group norms through discussion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 193-215. doi:10.1348/014466610X504805
44.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
45.
SternbergR. J. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
SwaabR. I.PostmesT.Van BeestI.SpearsR. (2007). Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared social identity: Studying the role of communication in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 187-199.
47.
SwannW. B.Jr.GillM. J. (1997). Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 747-757.
48.
ThomasG.FletcherG. J. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094.
49.
Van BeestI.WilliamsK. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918-928.
50.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.HofstraJ.BakkerW. (2003). Ontwikkeling en evaluatie van de Hechtingstijlvragenlijst (HSL) [Development and Evaluation of the Attachment Style Questionnaire {ASQ}]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 58, 95-102.
51.
VorauerJ. D.CameronJ. J. (2002). So close, and yet so far: Can social bonds foster transparency overestimation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1344-1352.
52.
WegnerD. M.GiulianoT.HertelP. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276). New York, NY: Springer.
53.
WilsonM.WilsonT. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 957-968. doi:10.3758/BF03206432.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
