This article proposes distinctions between guilt and two forms of shame: Guilt arises from a violated norm and is characterized by a focus on specific behavior; shame can be characterized by a threatened social image (Image Shame) or a threatened moral essence (Moral Shame). Applying this analysis to group-based emotions, three correlational studies are reported, set in the context of atrocities committed by (British) ingroup members during the Iraq war (Ns = 147, 256, 399). Results showed that the two forms of shame could be distinguished. Moreover, once the other form of shame was controlled for, they were differentially related to orientations toward the outgroup: Image Shame was associated with negative orientations, whereas Moral Shame had associations with positive outgroup orientations. These associations were distinct from the associations of guilt and rejection. Study 3 used a longitudinal design and provided evidence suggestive of a causal direction from emotions to outgroup orientation.
AllpressJ. A.BarlowF. K.BrownR.LouisW. R. (2010). Atoning for colonial injustices: Group-based shame and guilt motivate support for reparation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 75-88.
BaumeisterR. F.StillwellA. M.HeathertonT. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
4.
BijleveldC. J. H.van der KampL. J. T. (1998). Longitudinal data analysis: Designs, models and methods. London, England: SAGE.
5.
BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BranscombeN. R.SlugoskiB.KappenD. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrownR.ČehajićS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669-684.
8.
BrownR.GonzálezR.ZagefkaH.ManziJ.ČehajićS. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75-90.
9.
BrownR.TurnerJ. C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33-65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
11.
CombsD. J. Y.CampbellG.JacksonM.SmithR. H. (2010). Exploring the consequences of humiliating the moral transgressor. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 128-143.
12.
De HoogeI. E.BreugelmansS. M.ZeelenbergM. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933-943.
13.
DeonnaJ. A.RodognoR.TeroniF. (2011). In defense of shame: The faces of an emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
15.
FontaineJ. R. J.LuytenP.De BoeckP.CorveleynJ.FernandezM.HerreraD.. . .TomcsányiT. (2006). Untying the Gordian knot of guilt and shame: The structure of guilt and shame reactions based on situation and person variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 273-292.
16.
GauselN.LeachC. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social-image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468-478.
17.
GauselN.LeachC. W.VignolesV. L.BrownR. (2012). Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 941-960.
18.
GilbertP. (2003). Evolution, social roles, and the difference in shame and guilt. Social Research, 70, 1205-1230.
19.
Giner-SorollaR.PiazzaJ.EspinosaP. (2011). What do the TOSCA guilt and shame scales really measure: Affect or action?Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 445-450.
20.
HarthN. S.KesslerT.LeachC. W. (2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115-129.
21.
HarveyR. D.OswaldD. L. (2000). Collective guilt and shame as motivation for White support for Black programs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1790-1811.
22.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2004, February). Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on the treatment by the coalition forces of prisoners of war and other protected persons by the Geneva conventions in Iraq during arrest, internment and interrogation. Retrieved from http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/us/doc/icrc-prisoner-report-feb-2004.pdf
23.
IyerA.LeachC. W. (2008). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86-125.
24.
IyerA.LeachC. W.CrosbyF. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
25.
IyerA.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587.
26.
JohnsM.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331-348.
27.
LeachC. W.EllemersN. B.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in- groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
28.
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersonA. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232-1245.
LewisH. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
31.
LickelB.SchmaderT.CurtisM.ScarnierM.AmesD. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 145-157.
32.
LubyJ.BeldenA.SullivanJ.HayenR.McCadneyA.SpitznagelE. (2009). Shame and guilt in preschool depression: Evidence for elevations in self-conscious emotions in depression as early as age 3. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 1156-1166.
33.
LynamD. R.HoyleR. H.NewmanJ. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328-341.
34.
MeehanW.O’ConnorL. E.BerryJ. W.WeissJ.MorrisonA.AcamporaA. (1996). Guilt, shame, and depression in clients in recovery from addiction. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 28, 125-134.
35.
NiedenthalP. M.TangneyJ. P.GavanskiI. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585-595.
36.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690.
37.
ReesJ. H.AllpressJ. A.BrownR. (2013). Nie Wieder: Group-based emotions for in-group wrongdoing affect attitudes toward unrelated minorities. Political Psychology, 34, 387-407.
38.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
39.
RosemanI. J.WiestC.SwartzT. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-221.
40.
SchmaderT.LickelB. (2006). The approach and avoidance function of guilt and shame emotions: Comparing reactions to self-caused and other-caused wrongdoing. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 42-55.
41.
ShaverP.SchwartzJ.KirsonD.O’ConnorC. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061-1086.
42.
SmithE. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43.
SmithE. R.SegerC. R.MackieD. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 431-446.
44.
SmithR. H.WebsterM.ParrottW. G.EyreH. L. (2002). The role of public exposure in Moral and Non-Moral Shame and Guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 138-159.
45.
SwimJ. K.MillerD. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514.
46.
TajfelH. (1978). Interindividual and intergroup behaviour. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). London, England: Academic Press.
47.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
48.
TangneyJ. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598-607.
49.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
50.
TangneyJ. P.MillerR. S.FlickerL.BarlowD. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
51.
TangneyJ. P.WagnerP.FletcherC.GramzowR. (1992). Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 669-675.
52.
TeroniF.DeonnaJ. A. (2008). Differentiating shame from guilt. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 725-740.
53.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
