Reconciling competing viewpoints suggesting that power helps and hurts perspective-taking in close relationships, in two experiments and two daily experience studies we tested the hypothesis that power’s effect on perspective-taking depends on the extent to which people are relatively self-versus other-focused. In Study 1, recalling a time of high (vs. low) power over a romantic partner reduced inclinations to take the partner’s perspective for relatively self-focused but not other-focused individuals. Studies 2 and 3 replicated Study 1 using daily variations in power and perspective-taking. In Study 4, being the “in-charge” partner during a conflict conversation reduced empathic accuracy for more self-focused individuals. Self–other focus was assessed with measures of gratitude, relational self-construal, and social value orientation. The current findings provide evidence that, particularly for the more self-focused, relationship power influences people’s inclinations to take their romantic partner’s perspective in daily life as well as their empathic accuracy during conflict.
AdlerM. G.FagleyN. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73, 79-114.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risktaking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
4.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.
5.
ArriagaX. B.RusbultC. E. (1998). Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective-taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 927-948.
6.
BarberC. E. (1984). The influence of power and dependency on role-taking accuracy in three-generational families. Australian Journal of Sex, 5, 77-87.
7.
BartlettM. Y.DeStenoD. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17, 319-325.
8.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
9.
CampbellL.KashyD. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00023
10.
CarstensenL. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 3, 331-338.
11.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.
12.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.Hayden ChengB.OveisC.van der LöweI.LianH.KeltnerD. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217-232.
13.
CrossS. E.BaconP.MorrisM. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
14.
FelmleeD. H. (1994). Who’s on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275-295.
15.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627-658.
16.
GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W.GilinD.WhiteJ. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective-taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19, 378-384.
17.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
18.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS.LeeA. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326.
19.
GleasonK. A.Jensen-CampbellL. A.IckesW. (2009). The role of empathic accuracy in adolescents’ peer relations and adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 997-1011.
20.
GordonA. M.ImpettE. A.KoganA.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 257–274.
21.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E.KanagawaC. (2009). Acting in our interests: Relational self-construal and goal motivation across cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 75-87.
22.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.
InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H.GalinskyA. D. (2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others’ generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 795-803.
25.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonP. J. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
KarremansJ. C.SmithP. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010-1023.
27.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439-448.
30.
KilpatrickS. D.BissonnetteV. L.RusbultC. E. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behavior among newly married couples. Personal Relationships, 9, 369-393.
31.
KoganA.ImpettE. A.OveisC.HuiB.GordonA. M.KeltnerD. (2010). When giving feels good: The intrinsic benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships for the communally motivated. Psychological Science, 21, 1918-1924.
32.
KoganA.SaslowL.ImpettE. A.OveisC.KeltnerD.SaturnS. (2011). A thin-slicing study of the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and the evaluation and expression of the prosocial disposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 19189-19192.
33.
KubackaK. E.FinkenauerC.RusbultC. E.KeijsersL. (2011). Maintaining close relationships: Gratitude as a motivator and a detector of maintenance behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1326-1375.
34.
KuehnM. M.ChenS.GordonA. M. (2013). Belonging for bosses: The effects of social power on acceptance and rejection dynamics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
LinardatosL.LydonJ. E. (2011). Relationship-specific identification and spontaneous relationship maintenance process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 737-753.
36.
LongE. C. J. (1993). Maintaining a stable marriage: Perspective-taking as a predictor of a propensity to divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 21, 121-138.
37.
LongE. C. J.AndrewsD. W. (1990). Perspective-taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126-131.
38.
McCulloughM. E.KilpatrickS. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsonD. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect?Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249-266.
39.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
MessickD. M.McClintockC. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
41.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S. (1994). Communal and exchange relationships: Controversies and research. In ErberR.GilmourR. (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 29-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
PollmannM. M. H.FinkenauerC. (2009). Investigating two types of understanding in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1512-1527.
44.
RaudenbushS.BrykA.CheongY. F.CongdonR.du ToitM. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincoln, IL: Scientific Software International.
45.
SatterthwaiteF. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-114. doi:10.2307/3002019
46.
Schmid MastM.JonasK.HallJ. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835-850.
47.
SillarsA. L.PikeG. R.JonesT. S.MurphyM. A. (1984). Communication and understanding in marriage. Human Communication Research, 3, 317-350.
48.
SprecherS.FelmleeD. (1997). The balance of power in heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361-379.
49.
TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R.BrantL. J.CostaP. T.Jr (2005). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R Scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychology and Aging, 20, 493-506.
50.
ThomasD. L.FranksD. D.CalonicoJ. M. (1972). Role-taking and power in social psychology. American Sociological Review, 37, 605-614.
51.
TjosvoldD.SagariaS. D. (1978). Effects of relative power on cognitive perspective-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 256-259.
52.
Van LangeP. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
53.
Van LangeP. A. M.AgnewC. R.HarinckF.SteemersG. E. M. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330-1344.
54.
Van LangeP. A. M.OttenW.De BruinE. N. M.JoiremanJ. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
55.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373-1395.
56.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942-966.
