Empathic accuracy (EA), the ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings, is critical for fruitful empathic exchanges in intimate relationships. Most EA research was limited in their real-life validity and actor-partner considerations. Since reduced mental resources have been linked to decreased judgment accuracy and reduced emotional expressions, we predicted that both actor’s and partner’s mental depletion would be associated with lower EA towards partners’ relationship appraisals and moods. We also investigated moderation by valence of mood and by gender. Additional analyses tested the presence of anchoring and how it related to mental depletion and EA. Eighty-seven heterosexual couples in Hong Kong (N = 174, Mage = 28.81) contributed baseline data and diary data over two weeks (totaling 2416 diary data points). Data were analyzed with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Self and partner’s mental depletion was associated with decreased EA. The associations were stronger in EA for negative moods and in men’s EA for partner’s positive moods. Anchoring was present in the sample and correlated with higher EA but less mental depletion. Results offer insights into daily variations in EA and the dual process model of social cognition, and have implications for optimal communication timing.
AkerstedtT.FredlundP.GillbergM.JanssonB. (2002). Work load and work hours in relation to disturbed sleep and fatigue in a large representative sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(1), 585–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00447-6
2.
ArnstenA. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648
3.
BankerS.AinsworthS. E.BaumeisterR. F.ArielyD.VohsK. D. (2017). The sticky anchor hypothesis: Ego depletion increases susceptibility to situational cues. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(5), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2022
4.
BaumeisterR.VohsK. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 67–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.04.001
5.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
6.
CameronL. D.OverallN. C. (2018). Suppression and expression as distinct emotion-regulation processes in daily interactions: Longitudinal and meta-analyses. Emotion, 18(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000334
7.
CioneaI. A.Van GilderB. J.HoelscherC. S.AnagondahalliD. (2019). A cross-cultural comparison of expectations in romantic relationships: India and the United States. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(4), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1542019
8.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721c
9.
CrenshawA. O.LeoK.BaucomB. R. W. (2019). The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000508
10.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. L. Erlbaum.
13.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011
14.
EdwardsJ. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1108
15.
EvansJ.St. B. T.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
16.
FischerA.LaFranceM. (2015). What drives the smile and the tear: Why women are more emotionally expressive than men. Emotion Review, 7(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544406
17.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
18.
GadassiR.Bar-NahumL. E.NewhouseS.AndersonR.HeimanJ. R.RafaeliE.JanssenE. (2016). Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between sexual and marital satisfaction: A daily diary study in newlywed couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2
19.
GadassiR.MorN.RafaeliE. (2011). Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: An interpersonal model of gender differences in depression. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611414728
20.
Galland-DeckerC.Marques-VidalP.VollenweiderP. (2019). Prevalence and factors associated with fatigue in the Lausanne middle-aged population: A population-based, cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open, 9(8), Article e027070. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027070
GreenbergD. M.WarrierV.AllisonC.Baron-CohenS. (2018). Testing the empathizing-systemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(48), 12152–12157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811032115
23.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
24.
HambrookD.OldershawA.RimesK.SchmidtU.TchanturiaK.TreasureJ.RichardsS.ChalderT. (2011). Emotional expression, self-silencing, and distress tolerance in anorexia nervosa and chronic fatigue syndrome. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466510X519215
25.
HoffmannH.KesslerH.EppelT.RukavinaS.TraueH. C. (2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012
26.
HowlandM. (2016). Reading minds and being invisible: The role of empathic accuracy in invisible support provision. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615606195
27.
HowlandM.RafaeliE. (2010). Bringing everyday mind reading into everyday life: Assessing empathic accuracy with daily diary data. Journal of Personality, 78(5), 1437–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00657.x
28.
IckesW. (2009). Empathic accuracy: Its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social, and physiological psychology. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 57–70). Boston Review.
29.
IckesW.GesnP. R.GrahamT. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships, 7(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x
30.
IckesW.HodgesS. D. (2013). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 348–373). Oxford University Press.
31.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). Cambridge University Press.
32.
KayserK. C.PuigV. A.EsteppJ. R. (2022). Predicting and mitigating fatigue effects due to sleep deprivation: A review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article 930280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.930280
33.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (2010). Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. In HoxJ. J.RobertsJ. K. (Eds.), The handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 355–371). Routledge.
34.
KleinK. J. K.HodgesS. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276007
35.
KotiugaJ.DaspeM.-È.DawsonS. J.BergeronS.Vaillancourt-MorelM.-P. (2025). Empathic accuracy in couples: A daily diary study of relationship-related emotions. Emotion, 25(7), 1690–1703. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001532
LazarusG.Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE. (2018). Accurate where it counts: Empathic accuracy on conflict and no-conflict days. Emotion, 18(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000325
38.
Ma-KellamsC.LernerJ. (2016). Trust your gut or think carefully? Examining whether an intuitive, versus a systematic, mode of thought produces greater empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000063
39.
McNairD. M.LorrM.DropplemanL. F. (1981). Profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
40.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
NitschkeJ. P.PruessnerJ. C.BartzJ. A. (2022). Stress and stress-induced glucocorticoids facilitate empathic accuracy in men but have no effects for women. Psychological Science, 33(10), 1783–1794. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221101315
RafaeliE.GadassiR.HowlandM.BoussiA.LazarusG. (2017). Seeing bad does good: Relational benefits of accuracy regarding partners’ negative moods. Motivation and Emotion, 41(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9614-x
45.
RauersA.BlankeE.RiedigerM. (2013). Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: Do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings?Psychological Science, 24(11), 2210–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490747
46.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
47.
RicciJ. A.CheeE.LorandeauA. L.BergerJ. (2007). Fatigue in the U.S. workforce: Prevalence and implications for lost productive work time. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000249782.60321.2a
48.
RimesK. A.AshcroftJ.BryanL.ChalderT. (2016). Emotional suppression in chronic fatigue syndrome: Experimental study. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 35(9), 979–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000341
49.
RöselerL.SchützA.BaumeisterR. F.StarkerU. (2020). Does ego depletion reduce judgment adjustment for both internally and externally generated anchors?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87(1), Article 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103942
50.
SenedH.Bar-KalifaE.Pshedetzky-ShochatR.GleasonM.RafaeliE. (2020). Fast and slow empathic perceptions in couples’ daily lives use different cues. Affective Science, 1(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-020-00006-w
51.
SenedH.LavidorM.LazarusG.Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE.IckesW. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320
52.
SenedH.YovelI.Bar-KalifaE.GadassiR.RafaeliE. (2017). Now you have my attention: Empathic accuracypathways in couples and the role of conflict. Emotion, 17(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000220
TadmorC. T.HongY. Y.ChaoM. M.CohenA. (2018). The tolerance benefits of multicultural experiences depend on the perception of available mental resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 398–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000125
55.
TamirD. I.MitchellJ. P. (2013). Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028232
56.
ThayerJ.JohnsenB. H. (2000). Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: A multivariate analysis of recognition errors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00193
57.
ThomasG.FletcherG. J. O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1079
58.
ThomasG.MaioG. R. (2008). Man, I feel like a woman: When and how gender-role motivation helps mind-reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013067
WatanabeK.SasakiA. T.TajimaK.MizusekiK.MizunoK.WatanabeY. (2019). Mental fatigue is linked with attentional bias for sad stimuli. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8797–8798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45428-0
61.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
WongW. I.TsuiW. B. P.SiuT. C. (2021). Empathic accuracy of young boys and girls in ongoing parent-child interactions: Performance and (mis)perception. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, Article 105042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105042
64.
YongJ. C.YeoA. M.ShackelfordT. K.Weekes-ShackelfordV. A. (2021). Adaptive benefits of matriliny and “Walking Marriages” in Mosuo culture. In Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 81–88). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3843
65.
YoonJ. H.ParkN. H.KangY. E.AhnY. C.LeeE. J.SonC. G. (2023). The demographic features of fatigue in the general population worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1192121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1192121
66.
Zahn-WaxlerC.Radke-YarrowM. (1990). The origins of empathic concern. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991639
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
