Generally, the accessibility of goal-related constructs is inhibited upon goal fulfillment. In line with this notion, the current studies explored whether violent computer games may reduce relative accessibility of aggression if the game involves the fulfillment of an aggressive goal. Specifically, in Study 1, participants who watched a trailer for a violent computer game that fulfilled the goal of venting anger showed less relative accessibility of aggression compared to participants who watched the trailer without goal fulfillment. In Study 2, actually playing a violent computer game to vent anger also decreased the relative accessibility of aggression compared to a control condition in which the game was played without such a goal. Lastly, in Study 3, the relative accessibility of aggression was reduced after playing a violent computer game for participants who reported a high general tendency to vent their anger.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353-359.
2.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
3.
AndersonC. A.CarnageyN. L.FlanaganM.BenjaminA. J.EubanksJ.ValentineJ. C. (2004). Violent video games: Specific effects of violent content on aggressive thoughts and behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 199-249.
4.
AndersonC. A.DillK. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772-790.
5.
AndersonC. A.ShibuyaA.IhoriN.SwingE. L.BushmanB. J.SakamotoA.. . . SaleemM. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151-173.
6.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behaviour: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
7.
BarghJ. A.GollwitzerP. M.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarndollarK.TroetschelR. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
8.
BlümkeM.FriedrichM.ZumbachJ. (2010). The influence of violent and nonviolent computer games on implicit measures of aggressiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 1-13.
9.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F.PhillipsC. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17-32.
10.
ButterfieldE. C. (1964). The interruption of tasks: Methodological, factual and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 309-322.
11.
CarlsmithK. M.WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1316-1324.
12.
CarnageyN. L.AndersonC. A. (2004). Violent video game exposure and aggression: A literature review. Minerva Psichiatrica, 45, 1-18.
13.
Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention. (1995). The International Affective Picture System: Digitized photographs. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
14.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15.
DenzlerM.FörsterJ.LibermanN. (2009). How goal-fulfillment decreases aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 90-100.
16.
DenzlerM.FörsterJ.LibermanN.RozenmanM. (2010). Thirsty, aggressive and funny: A motivational inference model (MIMO) account to behavioral rebound. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1385-1396.
17.
DijksterhuisA.BarghJ. A. (2001). The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
FazioR. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latencies in social psychological research. In HendrickC.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
FörsterJ.DenzlerM. (2009). Self-regulation. In ForgasJ.KruglanskiA. (Series Eds.) & StrackF.FörsterJ. (Vol. Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology: Vol. 7. Social cognition (pp. 245-267). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
FörsterJ.LibermanN. (2007). Inhibition processes in comparisons. In StapelD. A.SulsJ. (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social judgments (pp. 231-261). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.FriedmanR. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211-233.
22.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220-239.
23.
GollwitzerM.DenzlerM. (2009). What makes revenge so sweet? Seeing the offender suffer or delivering a message?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 840-845.
24.
GoschkeT.KuhlJ. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
25.
HeckhausenH. (1991). Motivation and action. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
26.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
27.
HigginsE. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FriedmanR.FishbachA.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). Goal systems theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 331-378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1995). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
31.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
32.
LibermanN.FörsterJ. (2005). Motivation and construct accessibility. In ForgasJ. P.KiplingK. D.LahamS. M. (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes (Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology; pp. 228-248). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
LibermanN.FörsterJ.HigginsE. T. (2007). Completed vs. interrupted priming: Reduced accessibility from post-fulfillment inhibition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 258-264.
34.
MarshR. L.HicksJ. L.BinkM. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350-361.
35.
MarshR. L.HicksJ. L.BryanE. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions. Memory and Cognition, 27, 320-327.
36.
MussweilerT.FörsterJ. (2000). The sex → aggression link: A perception–behavior dissociation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 507-520.
37.
OlsonC. K. (2010). Children’s motivation for video game play in the context of normal development. Review of General Psychology, 14, 180-187.
38.
PaneeC. D.BallardM. E. (2002). High versus low aggressive priming during video-game training: Effects on violent action during game play, hostility, heart rate, and blood pressure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2458-2474.
39.
PrzybylskiA. K.RyanR. M.RigbyC. S. (2009). The motivating role of violence in video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 243-259.
SpielbergerC. D. (1979). State–Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Revised research edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
42.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
43.
TodorovA.BarghJ. A. (2002). Automatic sources of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 53-68.
44.
TwiskJ. W. R. (2006). Applied multilevel analysis: A practical guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.). (2006). Playing video games—Motives, responses, and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46.
WicklundR. A.GollwitzerP. M. (1982). Symbolic self completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
ZeigarnikB. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen [The memory of completed and uncompleted actions]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.
48.
ZumbachJ. (2008). Eine Spielsuite zur Analyse medial inszenierter Computergewalt [Soldiers go Sunflowers. A game-suite for analyzing computer violence]. Salzburg, Germany: Universität Salzburg.
