The present research tested competing approaches to individual differences in impression management (as measured with social desirability scales) and their implication for behavior in social contexts. A defensiveness approach argues that impression management is a source of defensive self-presentation, which causes performance impairment in public social settings. The competing adjustment approach argues that impression management measures friendliness and self-control, which should bring about performance facilitation in public social settings. To decide between these approaches, two experiments utilized a social facilitation paradigm, whereby task performance was compared between an alone and a public condition. The results supported the predictions of the adjustment approach. Across different tasks, a high impression management score was associated with performance facilitation in social presence, expressed in greater creativity, positive implicit affect, and high self-control. The results reveal previously unnoticed constructive effects of impression management, supporting the reframing of the trait as reflecting interpersonally oriented self-control.
Allport, F.H. ( 1967). The influence of the group upon association and thought . In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interactions (Rev. ed., pp. 31-34). New York, NY: Knopf . (Original work published 1920)
2.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
3.
Barger, S.D., Kircher, J.C., & Croyle, R.T. ( 1997). The effects of social context and defensiveness on the physiological responses of repressive copers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1118-1128.
4.
Baron, R.S. ( 1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1-40). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
Baumeister, R.F., & Alquist, J.L. ( 2009). Is there a downside to good self-control?Self and Identity, 2-3, 115-130.
6.
Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D.M. ( 1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
7.
Baumeister, R.F., & Cairns, K.J. ( 1992). Repression and self-presentation: When audiences interfere with self-deceptive strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 851-862.
8.
Blackhart, G.C., Eckel, L.A., & Tice, D.M. ( 2007). Salivary cortisol in response to acute social rejection and acceptance by peers. Biological Psychology, 75, 267-276.
9.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W.B., Hunter, S.B., & Salomon, K. ( 1999). Social "facilitation" as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 422-429.
10.
Bond, F.C., & Titus, L.J. ( 1983). Social facilitation: A meta analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
11.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. ( 1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables. European Journal of Personality, 6, 199-214.
12.
Bradburn, N.M., Sudman, S., Blair, E., Locander, W., Miles, C., Singer, E., & Stocking, C. ( 1979). Reinterpreting the Marlowe-Crowne Scale. In N. M. Bradburn & S. Sudman (Eds.), Improving interview method and questionnaire design (pp. 85-106). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. ( 1981). The self-attention induced feedback loop and social facilitation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 545-568.
14.
Cottrell, N.B. ( 1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185-236). New York, NY: Holt.
15.
Crowne, D.P. ( 1979). The experimental study of personality. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D.A. ( 1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 4, 349-354.
17.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D.A. ( 1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence . New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M.W. ( 1997). Interpretive biases for one’s own behaviour and physiology in high trait-anxious individuals and repressors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 816-825.
19.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Gallagher, D. ( 1991). Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being . Social Indicators Research, 24, 35-56.
20.
Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., & Barrett, P. ( 1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
21.
Fowers, B.J., Lyons, E.M., & Montel, K.H. ( 1996). Positive Marital illusions: Self-enhancement or relationship enhancement? Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 192-208.
22.
Getzels, J.W., & Jackson, P.W. ( 1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
Guerin, B. ( 1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Guerin, B., & Innes, J.M. ( 1982). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A new look at Zajonc’s mere presence hypothesis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 7-18.
25.
Kline, J.P., Blackhart, G.C., & Joiner, T.E. ( 2002). Sex, lies, and electrode caps: An interpersonal context for defensiveness and anterior electroencephalographic asymmetry. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 459-478.
26.
Lane, R.D., Merikangas, K.R., Schwartz, G.E., Huang, S.S., & Prusoff, B.A. ( 1990). Inverse relationship between defensiveness and life-time prevalence of psychiatric disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry , 147, 573-578.
27.
Madigan, R.J., & Bollenbach, A.K. (1982). Effects of induced mood on retrieval of personal episodic and semantic memories. Psychological Reports, 50, 147-157.
28.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. ( 1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
29.
Muniz, J., Garcia-Cueto, E., & Lozano, L.M. ( 2005). Item format and the psychometric properties of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences , 38, 61-69.
30.
Newton, T.L., & Contrada, R.J. (1992). Repressive coping and verbal autonomic response dissociation: The influence of social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 159-167.
31.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A.D. ( 1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing in personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology , 81, 660-679.
32.
Paulhus, D.L. ( 1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
33.
Paulhus, D.L. ( 2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct . In H. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582-593.
35.
Sackeim, H.A., & Gur, R.C. ( 1979). Self-deception, other-deception, and self-reported psychopathology . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 213-215.
36.
Schwartz, S.H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., & Sagiv, L. ( 1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 3-18.
37.
Smith, S.M., & Petty, R.E. ( 1995). Personality moderators of mood congruency effects on cognition: The role of self-esteem and negative mood regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1092-1107.
38.
Tamir, M., & Robinson, M.D. (2004). Knowing good from bad: The paradox of neuroticism, negative mood, and evaluative processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 913-925.
39.
Twenge, J.M., & Im, C. ( 2007). Changes in the need for social approval, 1958-2001. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 171-189.
40.
Uziel, L. ( 2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality , 41, 579-601.
41.
Uziel, L. ( 2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243-262.
42.
Uziel, L., & Baumeister, R.F. (2009). Personality and behaviour: A neglected opportunity?European Journal of Personality, 23, 433-435.
43.
Vohs, K.D., Baumeister, R.F., & Ciarocco, N. ( 2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88, 632-657.
44.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
45.
Weinberger, D.A. ( 1990). The construct validity of the repressive coping style . In J. L. Singer (Ed.), Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology and health (pp. 337-386). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Weinberger, D.A., Schwartz, G.E., & Davidson, R.J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioural and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369-380.
47.
Zajonc, R.B. ( 1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
