Three studies tested whether implicit prototypes about who is authentically American predict discriminatory behavior and judgments against Americans of non-European descent. These studies identified specific contexts in which discrimination is more versus less likely to occur, the underlying mechanism driving it, and moderators of such discrimination. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that the more participants held implicit beliefs that the prototypical American is White, the less willing they were to hire qualified Asian Americans in national security jobs; however, this relation did not hold in identical corporate jobs where national security was irrelevant. The implicit belief—behavior link was mediated by doubts about Asian Americans’ national loyalty. Study 3 demonstrated a similar effect in a different domain: The more participants harbored race-based national prototypes, the more negatively they evaluated an immigration policy proposed by an Asian American but not a White policy writer. Political conservatism magnified this effect because of greater concerns about the national loyalty of Asian Americans.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. ( 2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 98-106.
2.
Aiken, L., & West, S. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
4.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Barry, J. ( 2001, January). Does the administration owe Wen Ho Lee an apology?SpeakOut.com. Retrieved from http://speakout.com/activism/issue_briefs/1382b-1.html
6.
Beinart, P. ( 2008, October). Is Barack Obama American enough?Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1848755,00.html
7.
Chen, R., & Hanson, J. ( 2004). Categorically biased: The influence of knowledge structures on law and legal theory. Southern California Law Review, 77, 1103-1252.
8.
Cheryan, S., & Monin, B. ( 2005). "Where are you really from?" Asian-Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 89, 717-730.
9.
Citrin, J., Wong, C., & Duff, B. ( 2001). The meaning of American national identity: Patterns of ethnic conflict and consensus. In R. D. Ashmore , L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 71-100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Corneille, O., Leyens, J., Yzerbyt, V., & Walther, E. ( 1999). Judgeability concerns: The interplay of information, applicability, and accountability in the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 377-387.
11.
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. ( 2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466.
12.
Devos, T., Gavin, K., & Quintana, F. (2010). Say "Adios" to the American dream? The interplay between ethnic and national identity among Latino and Caucasian Americans . Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology , 16, 37-49.
13.
Devos, T., & Ma, D. ( 2008). Is Kate Winslet more American than Lucy Liu? The impact of construal processes on the implicit ascription of a national identity . British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 191-215.
14.
Devos, T., Ma, D., & Gaffud, T. ( 2008, February 8). Is Barack Obama American enough to be the next President? The role of ethnicity and nationality in American politics . Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
15.
Duckitt, J. ( 2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
16.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. ( 2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 1029-1046.
17.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
18.
Greenwald, A., Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. ( 2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
19.
Greenwald, A., Poehlman, A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. ( 2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
20.
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. ( 2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
21.
Hogg, M., Hains, S., & Mason, I. ( 1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of references, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75, 1248-1263.
22.
Hogg, M., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
23.
Hornsey, M., & Hogg, M. ( 2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 4, 143-156.
24.
Janoff-Bulman, R. ( 2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120-128.
25.
Jost, J., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. ( 2004). A decade of system-justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
26.
Marques, J., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
27.
Muller, D., Judd, C., & Yzerbyt, V. ( 2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
28.
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. ( 1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
29.
Murphy, G. ( 2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Picard, C. ( 2008, February). Is Obama patriotic enough?Today in the Military. Retrieved from http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,162667,00.html
31.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. ( 1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
32.
Preacher, K.J., & Leonardelli, G.J. (2003, November). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved from http://www.people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm#refs
33.
Preacher, K., Rucker, D., & Hayes, A. ( 2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 42, 185-227.
34.
Reid, S., & Hogg, M. ( 2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 31, 804-817.
35.
Scheer, R. ( 2000, October). How the New York Times convicted Wen Ho Lee . The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/doc/20001023/scheer
36.
Sibley, C., & Liu, J. ( 2007). New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1222-1243.
37.
Sobel, M.E. ( 1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-25). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
39.
Takaki, R. ( 1993). A different mirror: A history of multicultural America . Boston, MA: Little.
40.
Todd, C., Murray, M., & Montanaro, D. ( 2008, June). First thoughts: A focus group in York. MSNBC . Retrieved from http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/25/1166068.aspx
41.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42.
Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. ( 2005). When "different" means "worse": In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 76-83.
43.
Wenzel, M. ( 2001). A social categorization approach to distributive justice: Social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice . British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 315-335.
44.
Yzerbyt, V., Dardenne, B., & Leyens, J. ( 1998). Social judgeability concerns in impression formation . In V. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 126-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Yzerbyt, V., Schadron, G., Leyens, J., & Rocher, S. ( 1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55.
