This article documents the employment discrimination experienced by Americans “regarded as” disabled (but not medically verified as such), using the Integrated Mission System of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Claimants who were perceived as disabled, as contrasted with those with documented disabilities, were more likely to file charges of discrimination based on the issues of discharge or hiring. Decisions by the EEOC in favor of claimants perceived to have disabilities disproportionately exceeded those in favor of claimants with documented disabilities. This finding lends support to the assertion that unconscious/implicit bias is persistent in the workplace.
AntonakR. F.LivnehH. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Behavior, 22(5), 211–224.
2.
AuK. W.ManD.W.K. (2006). Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison between health care professionals and students. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29(2), 155–160.
3.
BarghJ. A.MorsellaE. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 73–79.
4.
BarghJ. A.WilliamsE. L. (2006). The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 1–4.
5.
Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc., 228 F.3d 1105 (U.S. Cir. Ct. App. 2000).
6.
BishopM.StenhoffD. M.BradleyK. D.AllenC. A. (2007). The differential effect of epilepsy labels on employer perceptions: Report of a pilot study. Epilepsy and Behavior, 11, 351–356.
7.
BoweF. G.McMahonB. T.ChangT.LouviI. (2005). Workplace discrimination, deafness and hearing impairment: The National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 25(1), 19–25.
8.
ConyersL.BoomerK. B.McMahonB. T. (2005). Workplace discrimination and HIV/AIDS: The National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 25(1), 37–48.
9.
CorriganP. W.WasselA. (2008). Understanding and influencing the stigma of mental illness. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 46, 42–48.
10.
DalginR. S.GilbrideD. (2003). Perspectives of people with psychiatric disabilities on employment disclosure. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(3), 306–310.
11.
EpsteinS. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
12.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
GreenwaldA. G.KriegerL. H. (2006). Symposium on behavioral realism: Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. California Law Review, 94, 943.
14.
HeijndersM.van der MeijS. (2006). The fight against stigma: An overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 11, 353–363.
15.
HewstoneM. (1989). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
JollsC.SunsteinC. R. (2006). Symposium on behavioral realism: The law of implicit bias. California Law Review, 94, 969.
17.
KihlstromJ. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237(Sept. 18), 1445.
McKennaM. A.FabianE.HurleyJ. E.McMahonB. T.WestS. L. (2007). Workplace discrimination and cancer. Work, 29(4), 313–322.
23.
McMahonB. T.EdwardsR.RumrillP. D.HurshN. (2005). An overview of the National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 25, 1–7.
24.
McMahonB. T.HurleyJ. E.WestS. L.ChanF.RoesslerR.RumrillP. D.Jr. (2008). A comparison of EEOC closures involving hiring versus other prevalent discrimination issues under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 106–111.
25.
McMahonB. T.WestS. L.ShawL. R.Waid-EbbsK.BelongiaL. (2005). Workplace discrimination and traumatic brain injury: The National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 25(1), 67–75.
26.
PescosolidoB. A.MartinJ. K.LongA.OlafsdottirS. (2008). Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: A framework integrating normative influences on stigma (FINIS). Social Science & Medicine, 67, 431–440.
27.
RobinsonM. B. (2003). Reasonable accommodation vs. seniority in the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act. St. Louis Law Journal, 47, 179.
28.
RosenthalR. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology?American Psychologist, 45, 775–777.
29.
RubinS. E.RoesslerR. T. (2008). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (6th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
30.
ScamblerG. (2009). Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 441–455.
31.
ShevrinH. (1996). Conscious and unconscious processes: Psychodynamic, cognitive and neurophysiological convergences. New York: Guilford.
TartagliaA.McMahonB. T.WestS. L.BelongiaL. (2005). Workplace discrimination and disfigurement: The National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 25(1), 57–65.
34.
Taylor v. Pathmark Stores, Inc., 177 F.3d 180 (U.S. Ct. App. 1999).
35.
ThornicroftG.RoseD.KassamA.SartoriusN. (2007). Stigma: Ignorance, prejudice, or discrimination?British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 192–193.
36.
TravisM. A. (2002). Perceived disabilities, social cognition, and “innocent mistakes.”Vanderbilt Law Review, 55, 481–579.
37.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974, September27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
38.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2005). The ADA: Your employment rights as an individual with a disability. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/ada18.html
39.
Van WierenT. A.ReidC. A.McMahonB. T. (2008). Workplace discrimination and autism spectrum disorders: The National EEOC ADA Research Project. Work, 31(3), 299–308.
40.
WestenD. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061–1106.
41.
WheelerC. M. (1999). Comment. Employment—Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.: The interactive process and the ADA. University of Memphis Law Review, 29, 883–889.
