Dominant groups have claimed to be the targets of discrimination on several historical occasions during violent intergroup conflict and genocide.The authors argue that perceptions of ethnic victimization among members of dominant groups express social dominance motives and thus may be recruited for the enforcement of group hierarchy. They examine the antecedents of perceived ethnic victimization among dominants, following 561 college students over 3 years from freshman year to graduation year. Using longitudinal, cross-lagged structural equation modeling, the authors show that social dominance orientation (SDO) positively predicts perceived ethnic victimization among Whites but not among Latinos, whereas victimization does not predict SDO over time. In contrast, ethnic identity and victimization reciprocally predicted each other longitudinally with equal strength among White and Latino students. SDO is not merely a reflection of contextualized social identity concerns but a psychological, relational motivation that undergirds intergroup attitudes across extended periods of time and interacts with the context of group dominance.
Abdulganiyev, K. ( 2002). Institutional development of the Crimean Tatar National Movement. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from International Committee for Crimea Web site: http://www.iccrimea.org/scholarly/national-movement.html
2.
Æsop. (1909-1914). Æsop’s fables (Harvard classics series, Vol. 17, Part 1). New York: P. F. Collier.
3.
Amiot, C.E., & Bourhis, R.Y. ( 2005). Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 581-598.
4.
Bartov, O. ( 1998). Defining enemies, making victims: Germans, Jews, and the Holocaust. American Historical Review, 103, 771-816.
5.
Bettencourt, B.A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D.L. ( 2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.
6.
Bonilla-Silva, E. ( 2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
7.
Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T., & Harvey, R.D. ( 1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African-Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
8.
Brewer, M.B. ( 2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738.
9.
Brewer, M.B., & Brown, R.J. ( 1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 554-594). Boston: McGraw-Hill .
10.
Brewer, M.B., & Campbell, D.T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. London: Sage.
11.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. ( 1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-636.
12.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. ( 1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 504-553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
13.
de Figueiredo, R.J.P., Jr., & Weingast, B.R. (1997). The rationality of fear: Political opportunism and ethnic conflict. Retrieved July 20, 2003, from http://www.ciaonet.org/conf/iwp01/iwp01ag.html
14.
Ellemers, N. ( 1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
15.
Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. ( 1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries . European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
16.
Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. ( 1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 233-246.
17.
Fang, C.Y., Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 1998). Romance across the social status continuum: Interracial marriage and the ideological asymmetry effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 290-305.
18.
Fiske, A.P. ( 1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations: Communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. New York: Free Press .
19.
Foley, M.W. ( 1999). Memory, forgiveness and reconciliation: Confronting the violence of history. Report on a conference at the Institute of Conflict Resolution and Ethnic Conflict (Incore). Retrieved April 7, 2004, from sciences.cua.edu/pol/faculty/conferenceRpt.htm
20.
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. ( 2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
21.
Guimond, S., Oliveira, P.D., Kamiesjki, R., & Sidanius, J. ( 2009). The trouble with assimilation: Social dominance and the emergence of hostility against immigrants. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
Heaven, P.C.L. ( 1999). Attitudes toward women’s rights: Relationships with social dominance orientation and political group identities. Sex Roles, 41, 605-614.
23.
Hertig, J.R. ( 1985). Multiple indicator models using LISREL. In H. M. Blalock Jr. (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences (pp. 263-319). New York: Aldine.
24.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. ( 2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology , 53, 575-604.
25.
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T., & Spears, R. ( 2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204-1213.
26.
Jost, J.T. ( 2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. ( 1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
28.
Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. ( 2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-920.
29.
Kinder, D.K., & Sanders, L.M. ( 1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Lalonde, R.N., Giguere, B., Fontaine, M., & Smith, A. ( 2007). Social dominance orientation and ideological asymmetry in relation to interracial dating and transracial adoption in Canada. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 559-572.
31.
Lehmiller, J.J., & Schmitt, M.T. ( 2007). Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 704-724.
32.
Levene, R., & Dickins, T.E. ( 2008). Sex-related invariance across cultures in an online role-playing game. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 141-148.
33.
Levin, S. ( 1996). A social psychological approach to understanding intergroup attitudes in the United States and Israel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of California, Los Angeles.
34.
Levin, S. ( 2004). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 25, 31-48.
35.
Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. ( 1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99-126.
36.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J.L., & Federico, C. ( 1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
37.
Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Foote, W. ( 2006). Ethnic segregation and perceived discrimination in college: Mutual influences and effects on social and academic life. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1471-1501.
38.
Major, B., Gramzow, R.H., McCoy, S.K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. ( 2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
39.
Major, B., & O’Brien, L.T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421.
40.
Major, B., Quinton, W.J., & Schmader, T. ( 2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220-231.
41.
Mertus, J. ( 2001). The impact of intervention on local human rights culture . A Kosovo case study. Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1, 21-36.
42.
Mitchell, M., & Sidanius, J. ( 1993). Group status and asymmetry in the relationship between ideology and death penalty support: A social dominance perspective. National Journal of Sociology, 7, 67-93.
43.
Murithi, T. ( 1998). Electoral systems and the management of ethnic conflict in Africa. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://www.psa.ac.uk/cps/1998/murithi.pdf
44.
Ogletree, C.J., Jr. & Sarat, A. (2006). From lynch mobs to killing state: Race and the death penalty in America. New York : New York University Press.
45.
Operario, D., & Fiske, S.T. ( 2001). Ethnic identity moderates perceptions of prejudice: Judgments of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550-561.
46.
Ozcelik, S. ( 2000). Psychological, historical and political barriers between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://www.geocities.com/tatarkirim/kibris1.html
47.
Peña, Y., & Sidanius, J. ( 2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tale of asymmetry. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 782-790.
48.
Pratto, F. ( 1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 191-263.
49.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. ( 2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320.
50.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. ( 1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
51.
Proctor, C. ( 2003). Bruin partisans debate current hot topics. Daily Bruin. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://dailybruin.ucla.edu/archives/id/22827/
52.
Reynolds, K.J., Turner, J.C., Haslam, S.A., Ryan, M.K., Bizumic, B., & Subasic, E. ( 2007). Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm. Journal of British Social Psychology, 46, 517-539.
53.
Richardson, J.M., Jr. , & Sen, S. (1996). Ethnic conflict and economic development: A policy oriented analysis. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from the School of International Service, American University Web site: http://www.american.edu/jrich/Richardson.ethnic.confl.html
54.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. ( 1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
55.
Scheepers, D. ( 2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 228-233.
56.
Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. ( 2005). Then the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threats in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192-200.
57.
Schmitt, M.T., & Branscombe, N.R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups . In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 167-199). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
58.
Schmitt, M.T., Branscombe, N.R., & Kappen, D.M. ( 2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
59.
Schmitt, M.T., Branscombe, N.R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. ( 2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197-210.
60.
Sears, D.O., & Henry, P.J. ( 2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 37, 95-150.
61.
Sibley, C.G., Wilson, M.S., & Duckitt, J. ( 2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160-172.
62.
Sidanius, J. ( 1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar, W. J. McGuire, S. Iyengar, & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
63.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. ( 2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism, and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication . European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67.
64.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. ( 1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure ofAmerican society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 385-408.
65.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. ( 1998). Hierarchical group relations, institutional terror, and the dynamics of the criminal justice system. In J. L. Eberhardt, S. T. Fiske, J. L. Eberhardt, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 136-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sears, D.O. ( 2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
67.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 2003). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 207-213.
69.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. ( 1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
70.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. ( 1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
71.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194-216.
72.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. ( 2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-880.
73.
Sidanius, J., van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. ( 2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the campus college: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 86-110.
74.
Stephan, W.G., & Renfro, C.L. ( 2003). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions. Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191-207). New York: Psychology Press.
75.
Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. ( 2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
Staerklé, C., Sidanius, J., Green, E.G.T., & Molina, L. ( 2005). Ethnic majority-minority asymmetry and attitudes towards immigrants across 11 nations. Psicologica Politica, 30, 7-26.
77.
Subotic, J. ( 2000). The role of intelligentsia and media in creating a national worldview: The case of Serbia. Retrieved July 1, 2003, from http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jrshiffman/symposium%20files/Best%20Papers%20(pdf)/Subotic%20paper.pdf
78.
Tajfel, H. ( 1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 695-715). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
80.
Thomsen, L., Green, E.G.T., & Sidanius, J. ( 2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 44, 1455-1464.
81.
Turner, J.C. ( 1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology , 5, 5-34.
82.
Turner, J.C., & Reynolds, K.J. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199-206.
83.
Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.). (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
Wohl, M.J.A., & Branscombe, N.R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 988-1006.
