It seems likely that treatment of deviants within a group will be determined not just by the nature of their deviance but also by the history of their treatment. In two experiments, participants read cases in which group members advocated for change in a way that was non-normative for the group and were marginalized as a result. Participants were further informed that either the deviant was psychologically reintegrated or remained marginalized. Results showed that when deviants were reintegrated group members were more negative toward the deviant the more they identified with the group. Where the deviant remained excluded, this effect either disappeared or reversed. These effects were mediated by participants’ perceptions of the destructiveness of the deviant’s message, suggesting that ongoing exclusion can defuse threat. Reintegration into the group can have ironic costs in a person’s ability to communicate a deviant opinion successfully.
Abrams, D., Marques, J.M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. ( 2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
2.
Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., Marques, J.M., & Hutchison, P. ( 2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 95, 662-678.
3.
Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M.J., & Gallois, C. ( 2006). Group-directed criticism in Indonesia: Role of message source and audience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology , 9, 96-102.
4.
Asch, S.E. ( 1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35.
5.
Branscombe, N.R., Wann, D.L., Noel, J.G., & Coleman, J. ( 1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 19, 381-388.
6.
Castano, E., Paladino, M.-P., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385.
7.
Choi, H.-S., & Levine, J.M. ( 2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
8.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & West, M.A. ( 2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 1191-1201.
9.
Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. ( 2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection ? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 602-609.
10.
Eidelman, S., Silvia, P.J., & Biernat, M. ( 2006). Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1153-1164.
11.
Festinger, L. ( 1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
12.
Festinger, L. ( 1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
13.
Hogg, M.A. ( 1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions . In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 85-111). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
14.
Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. ( 1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hornsey, M.J. ( 2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 301-334). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
16.
Hornsey, M.J. ( 2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups . In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 74-91): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Hornsey, M.J., De Bruijn, P., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. ( 2005). Keeping it in-house: How audience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 291-312.
18.
Hornsey, M.J., Grice, T., Jetten, J., Paulsen, N., & Callan, V. ( 2007). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1036-1048.
19.
Hornsey, M.J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. ( 2002). "It’s ok if we say it, but you can’t": Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
20.
Hutchison, P., Abrams, D., Gutierrez, R., & Viki, G.T. ( 2008). Getting rid of the bad ones: The relationship between group identification, deviant derogation, and identity maintenance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 874-881.
21.
Janis, I.L. ( 1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
22.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. ( 1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
23.
Jordan, A.H., & Monin, B. ( 2008). From sucker to saint: Moralization in response to self-threat . Psychological Science, 19, 809-815.
24.
Khan, S., & Lambert, A.J. ( 1998). Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 20, 263-269.
25.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Webster, D.M. ( 1991). Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 61, 212-225.
26.
Levine, J.M. ( 1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Levine, J.M., Choi, H.-S., & Moreland, R.L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 202-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology , 5, 305-336.
29.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Vol. 19. Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (pp. 203-228). Boston: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
30.
Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L., & Hausmann, L.R.M. (2005). Managing group composition: Inclusive and exclusive role transitions. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 137-160). New York: Psychology Press.
31.
Louis, W.R., & Chan, M.K.H. ( 2009). The role of group power and normative similarity to outgroups in high identifiers’ support for conformity versus dissent . Unpublished manuscript.
32.
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. ( 1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 18, 302-318.
33.
Marques, J.M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
34.
Marques, J.M., & Paez, D. ( 1994). The "black sheep effect": Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37-68.
35.
Marques, J.M., Robalo, E.M., & Rocha, S.A. ( 1992). Ingroup bias and the "black sheep" effect: Assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352.
36.
Marques, J.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
37.
Marques, J.M., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Leyens, J.-P. ( 1988). The "black sheep effect": Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
38.
Milgram, S. ( 1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
39.
Monin, B., Sawyer, P.J., & Marquez, M.J. ( 2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 95, 76-93.
40.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. ( 1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
41.
Moscovici, S. ( 1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
42.
Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. ( 1972). Social influence, conformity bias, and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 149-202). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Nemeth, C.J. ( 1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments . Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.
44.
Packer, D.J. ( 2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72.
45.
Packer, D.J. ( 2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems . Psychological Science, 20, 546-548.
46.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. ( 2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
47.
Schachter, S. ( 1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
48.
Sherif, M. ( 1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 187, 60.
49.
Smith, J.R., & Louis, W.R. ( 2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647-666.
50.
Sobel, M.E. ( 1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
51.
Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. ( 1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
52.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
53.
Turner, J.C., Wetherell, M.S., & Hogg, M.A. ( 1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 135-147.
54.
van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. ( 1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289-300.
55.
Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J.M. ( 2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 502-509.
