Two studies explored responses to ingroup deviance. Group-defining opinions of prowar Republicans (Study 1) and prolife Christians (Study 2) were challenged by either an ingroup or outgroup deviate. Participants evaluated the deviate and structured the boundaries of their ingroup in counterbalanced order. Of importance, boundary structuring allowed participants to exclude deviates from the ingroup. Consistent with previous research, ingroup deviates were devalued relative to out-group deviates, but only when target evaluation was participants’ first response option. Participants excluded deviates from the boundaries of their ingroup irrespective of measure order, and doing so eliminated differential devaluation when exclusion was participants’ first response option. Exclusion decreased liking for outgroup deviates in Study 1 and increased liking for ingroup deviates in Study 2. The findings suggest that devaluation is an attempt to exclude deviates from the ingroup and that doing so reduces the threat otherwise experienced.
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Brown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pronorm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
2.
Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., & Tendayi Viki, G. (2005). When bad becomes good (and vice versa): Why social exclusion is not based on difference. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 161-189). New York: The Psychology Press.
3.
Archer, D. (1985). Social deviance. In G. Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 743-804). New York: Random House.
4.
Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Theno, S. A. (1996). Violating American values: A “value-congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 387-410.
5.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
6.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
7.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics. London: Tavistock.
8.
Darley, J. (2001). Social comparison motives in ongoing groups. In M. A. Hogg & R S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 334-351). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
Davis, K. E., & Jones, E. E. (1960). Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 402-410.
10.
Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 602-609.
11.
Ellemers, N., & Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52-65.
12.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
13.
Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.
14.
Gaertner, D. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
15.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). New York: John Wiley.
16.
Israel, J. (1956). Self-evaluation and rejection in groups: Three experimental studies and a conceptual outline. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
17.
Iwao, S. (1963). Internal versus external criticism of group standards. Sociometry, 26, 410-421.
18.
Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331-378). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Lauderdale, P., Smith-Cunnien, P., Parker, J., & Inverarity, J. (1984). External threat and the definition of deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1058-1068.
20.
Lerner, M. J., & Agar, E. (1972). The consequences of perceived similarity: Attraction and rejection, approach and avoidance. Journal of Experimental Research on Personality, 6, 69-75.
21.
Levine, J. M. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-336). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23.
Levine, J. M., & Thompson, L. (1996). Conflict in groups. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanksi (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 745-776). New York: Guilford.
24.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers (D. E. Adams & K. E. Zener, Trans). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol.3): Group processes (pp. 400-424). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
27.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serodio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of ingroup deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
28.
Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
29.
Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
30.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Newcomb, T. (1959). Individual systems of orientation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 384-422). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Orcutt, J. D. (1973). Societal reaction and the response to deviation in small groups. Social Forces, 52, 259-267.
33.
Rokeach, M., & Mezei, L. (1966). Race and shared belief as factors in social choice. Science, 151, 167-172.
34.
Rokeach, M., Smith, P. W., & Evans, R. I. (1960). Two kinds of prejudice or one? In M. Rokeach (Ed.), The open and closed mind(pp. 132-168). New York: Basic Books.
35.
Sampson, E. E., & Brandon, A. C. (1964). The effect of role and opinion deviation on small group behavior. Sociometry, 27, 261-281.
36.
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviance, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
37.
Smith, C. R., Williams, L., & Willis, R. H. (1967). Race, sex, and belief as determinants of friendship acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 127-137.
38.
Snyder, C. R., Lassegard, M. A., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 383-388.
39.
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5-19.
40.
Taylor, S. E., & Mettee, D. R. (1971). When similarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 75-81.
41.
Tesser, A. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290-299.
