A Situation's First Powers Are Attracting Volunteers and Selecting Participants: A Reply to Haney and Zimbardo (2009)

Abstract

This reply addresses three issues raised by C. Haney and P. G. Zimbardo (2009) in their critique of T. Carnahan and S. McFarland (2007). First, it clarifies Carnahan and McFarland's appreciation of the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) but suggests that as a model for the power of situations, the SPE does not adequately consider self-selection and selection by others, both based in part in personal dispositions. Second, it comments briefly on Haney and Zimbardo's critique of Carnahan and McFarland's study and of its applicability to the SPE. Finally, it illustrates the importance of selection and self-selection for situations of torture and suggests their importance for many situations.

Keywords

Stanford Prison Experiment dispositionalism person—situation interactionism authoritarian-ism Abu Ghraib

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno, T.W. , Frenkel-Brunswik, E. , Levinson, D.J. , & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

Carnahan, T. , & McFarland, S.G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty ? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603-614.

Darby, J. (2006, October 3). Personal interview with Sam McFarland . Audio of the interview is available at http://www.wku.edu/~sam.mcfarland/darbyinterview.mp3.

Greenberg, K. J. , & Dratel, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). The torture papers: The road to Abu Ghraib. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Haney, C. , Banks, C. , & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.

Haney, C. , & Zimbardo, P.G. (2009). Persistent dispositionalism in interactionist clothing: Fundamental attribution error in explaining prison abuse. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 807-814.

Haritos-Fatouros, M. (1988). The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18, 1107-1120.

Haritos-Fatouros, M. (2003). The psychological origins of institutionalized torture. New York: Routledge.

Haslam, S.A. , & Reicher, S. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615-622.

10.

Huggins, M.K. , Haritos-Fatouros, M. , & Zimbardo, P.G. (2002). Violence workers: Police torturers and murderers reconstruct Brazilian atrocities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

11.

McHoskey, J.W. , Worzel, W. , & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192-210.

12.

Ricks, T. (2006). Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq . New York: Penguin Books (2006).

13.

Roberts, B.W. , Caspi, A. , & Moffitt, T.E. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 84, 582-593.

14.

Zimbardo, P.G. (2004, May 9). Power turns good soldiers into `bad apples.' Boston Globe, p. D11.

15.

Zimbardo, P.G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House .