The present study examined the coverage of Stanford prison experiment (SPE), including criticisms of the study, in introductory psychology courses through an online survey of introductory psychology instructors (N = 117). Results largely paralleled those of the recently published textbook analyses with ethical issues garnering the most coverage, but other theoretical and methodological criticisms more sparsely covered by instructors. This resemblance was also true in terms of the use of references critical of the SPE including Carnahan and McFarland’s study and the British Broadcasting Corporation prison study, both of which were cited infrequently in textbook content analyses. Results suggest criticisms of the landmark SPE in the classroom are noted with similar frequency as in introductory psychology textbooks.
BanuaziziA.MovahediS. (1975). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. American Psychologist, 30, 152–160.
2.
BartelsJ. M. (2015). The Stanford prison experiment in introductory psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 14, 36–50. doi:10.1177/1475725714568007
3.
BartelsJ. M.HernandezJ. (May, 2013). Situation and person: A content analysis of the Stanford Prison Experiment in introductory psychology textbooks. Presented at the annual convention for the Association for Psychological Science. Washington, DC.
4.
BartelsJ. M.HernandezJ.HenningV.BekovicD. (3, 2015). Representation of the Stanford Prison Experiment in social psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Presented at the International Convention of Psychological Science. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
5.
BanyardP. (2007). Tyranny and the tyrant: From Stanford to Abu Ghraib. [Review of the book The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil, by P. G. Zimbardo]. The Psychologist, 20, 494–495.
6.
CarnahanT.McFarlandS. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603–614. doi:10.1177/0146167206292689
7.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
8.
GriggsR. A. (2014). Coverage of the Stanford Prison Experiment in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0098628314537968
9.
GriggsR. A.WhiteheadG. I. (2014). Coverage of the Stanford Prison Experiment in introductory social psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 318–324. doi:10.1177/0098628314549703
10.
HaneyC.BanksC.ZimbardoP. (1973a). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.
11.
HaneyC.BanksC.ZimbardoP. (1973b). A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Research Reviews, 9, 1–17.
12.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. (2006). Debating the psychology of tyranny: Fundamental issues of theory, perspective and science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 55–63. doi:10.1348/014466605x80686
13.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615–622. doi:10.1177/0146167206298570
14.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. (2012). Tyranny: Revisiting Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment. In SmithJ. R.HaslamS. A. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classic Studies (pp. 126–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
McFarlandS.CarnahanT. (2009). A situation’s first powers are attracting volunteers and selecting participants: A reply to Haney and Zimbardo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 815–818. doi:10.1177/0146167209334781
ReicherS.HaslamS. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1–40. doi:10.1348/014466605x48998
18.
ZimbardoP. G. (1973, April). The mind is a formidable jailer: A Pirandellian prison. The New York Times Magazine, Section 6, pp. 38, ff.
19.
ZimbardoP. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.
20.
ZimbardoP. G.MaslachC.HaneyC. (1999). Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences. In BlassT. (Ed.), Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm (pp. 193–237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
