Prior research indicates that East Asians are more sensitive to contextual information than Westerners. This article explored aesthetics to examine whether cultural variations were observable in art and photography. Study 1 analyzed traditional artistic styles using archival data in representative museums. Study 2 investigated how contemporary East Asians and Westerners draw landscape pictures and take portrait photographs. Study 3 further investigated aesthetic preferences for portrait photographs. The results suggest that (a) traditional East Asian art has predominantly context-inclusive styles, whereas Western art has predominantly object-focused styles, and (b) contemporary members of East Asian and Western cultures maintain these culturally shaped aesthetic orientations. The findings can be explained by the relation among attention, cultural resources, and aesthetic preference.
Azuma, H. (2000, January). Sonzaironteki, koukokuteki, superflatteki [Ontological, advertising, and superflat-like]. In hirokiazuma.com texts. Retrieved January 6, 2002, from http://www .t3.rim.or.jp/~hazuma/texts/texts.html
2.
Blatt, S.J. (1984). Narcissism and egocentrism as concepts in individual and cultural development. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, 291-303.
3.
Bond, M.H., & Cheung, T.S. (1983). College students' spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
4.
Burchhardt, J.W. (1950). The civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (3rd ed., S. G. C. Middlemore , Trans.). London: Phaidon. (Original work published 1860)
5.
Chua, H.F., Boland, J., & Nisbett, R.E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 12629-12633.
6.
Cohen, D., & Gunz, A. (2002). As seen by the other . . .: Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 13, 55-59.
7.
Cohen, D., & Hoshino-Browne, E. (2005). Insider and outsider perspectives on the self and social world. In R. M. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Cultural and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 49-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cohen, D., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Leung, A.K. (2007). Culture and the structure of personal experience: Insider and outsider phenomenologies of the self and social world. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 1-67). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
9.
Fernald, A., & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. Child Development , 3, 637-656.
10.
Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). The cultural matrix in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
French, C. (1978). Through closed doors: Western influence on Japanese art 1639-1853. Rochester, MI: Oakland University, Meadow Brook Art Gallery.
12.
Giedion, S. (1964). Space, time and architecture, the growth of a new tradition (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Gombrich, E.H. (1966). The story of art (11th ed.). London: Phaidon.
14.
Gombrich, E.H. (1995). Shadows: The depiction of cast shadows in Western art. London: National Gallery Publications .
15.
Gombrich, E.H. (2000). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1961)
16.
Gutchess, A.H., Welsh, R.C., Boduroglu, A., & Park, D.C. (2006). Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 102-109.
17.
Itasaka, G. (1971). Nihonjin no ronrikozo [The logical structure of Japanese thought]. Tokyo: Kodan-sha .
18.
Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R.E. (2000). Culture, control and perception of relationship in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 943-955.
19.
Kenmochi, T. (1992). Ma no nihon bunka [The concept of space in Japanese culture]. Tokyo: Chobun-sya.
20.
Kiers, J., & Tissink, F. (2000). The glory of the golden age. Dutch art of the 17th century: Paintings, sculpture, and decorative art at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. Zwolle, Netherlands: Waanders.
21.
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J.T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at the New Look. Psychological Science , 14, 201-206.
22.
Kubovy, M. (1986). The psychology of perspective and Renaissance art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
24.
Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P., Mesquita, B., Leu, J.X., Tanida, S., & van de Veerdon, E. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 365-381.
25.
Masuda, T., Nhan, D., & Ito, K. (2008). Culture and change blindness: Examining the malleability of patterns of attention between European Canadians and Japanese. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alberta, Canada.
26.
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R.E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.
Masuda, T., Wang, H., & Ito, K. (February, 2008). Cultural influence on web-designs. Culture and the Internet environment: Comparing complexity of designs among Canadian, American, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese Webpages. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
29.
Minami, H. (1983). Ma no kenkyu: Nihonjin no biteki kankaku [Studies of the concept of "ma": Aesthetics of the Japanese]. Tokyo : Kodan-sha.
30.
Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R.E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17, 113-119.
31.
Murakami, T. (2000). Super flat visual book. Tokyo : Madora-sha.
32.
Nisbett, R.E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently . . . and why. New York: Free Press.
33.
Nisbett, R.E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 100, 11163-11175.
34.
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review , 108, 291-310.
35.
Paine, R.T., & Soper, A. (1955). The art and architecture of Japan. Baltimore: Penguin.
36.
Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts: Paper in and on art history. New York: Doubleday.
37.
Shimada, N. (1990). Kaiga no chisiki hyakka [Encyclopedia of paintings] . Tokyo: Shufu to Seikatsu Sha.
38.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
Witkin, H.A. (1967). A cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research . International Journal of Psychology, 2, 233-250.
40.
Witkin, H.A., & Berry, J.W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 6, 4-87.
41.
Witkin, H.A., & Goodenough, D.R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689.
