Labor arbitrators were asked to render decisions about grievances brought by employees who had been fired because of problems created by work conflicts with family responsibilities. The study examined the effects of experimentally manipulated grievant attributes (gender, type of work–family conflict) as well as arbitrator attributes (gender, political ideology) on decision making. When employees were depicted as having had child care problems, liberal arbitrators tended to favor female over male grievants, and political conservatism predicted more favorable judgments rendered toward male grievants. Overall, the data suggest that child care responsibilities cue different patterns of gender bias among liberal and conservative decision makers.
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (2007). Fact sheet 2007: Professional women: Vital statistics. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://www.dpeaflcio.org/programs/factsheets/fs_2007_Professional_Women.htm
2.
Anderson, D.J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2003). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 273-294.
3.
Barham, E.J. (1996). Managers as gatekeepers: Factors affecting managers' willingness to grant alternative work arrangements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 740.
4.
Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400.
5.
Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.
6.
Biernat, M., Crosby, F., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2004). The maternal wall: Research and policy perspectives on discrimination against mothers [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4).
7.
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72, 544-557.
8.
Biernat, M., & Malin, M. (2006). An empirical investigation of factors affecting outcomes of discipline arbitrations where work and family responsibilities conflict. In C. J. Coleman (Ed.), Arbitration 2005: The evolving world of work (pp. 132-157). Washington, DC: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc .
9.
Boldry, J., Wood, W., & Kashy, D.A. (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 689-705.
10.
Bond, J.T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2002). Highlights of the National Study of the Changing Workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.
11.
Bridges, J.S., & Etaugh, C. (1995). College students' perceptions of mothers: Effects of maternal employment-childrearing pattern and motive for employment. Sex Roles, 32, 735-751.
12.
Bridges, J.S., Etaugh, C., & Barnes-Farrell, J. (2002). Trait judgments of stay-at-home and employed parents: A function of social role and/or shifting standards ? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 140-150.
13.
Budig, M., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204-225.
14.
Correll, S.J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338.
15.
Crandall, C.S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882-894. Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues , 60, 701-718.
16.
Dalton, D.R., Mesch, D.J., Owen, C.L., & Todor, W.D. (1997). The "Iron Law of Paternalism" in employee grievances and arbitration? A comparison of disciplinary and nondisciplinary cases. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 291-305.
17.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist , 39, 105-116.
18.
Eagly, A.H., & Steffen, V.J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
19.
Eisenman, R. (1991). Gender and racial prejudice of conservative college women. Psychological Reports, 68, 450.
20.
Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215-223.
21.
Etaugh, C., & Moss, C. (2001). Attitudes of employed women toward parents who choose full-time or part-time employment following their child's birth. Sex Roles, 44, 611-619.
22.
Feather, N.T. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations of unemployment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 48, 876-889.
23.
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
24.
Firth, M. (1982). Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women . Sex Roles, 8, 891-901.
25.
Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737-754.
26.
Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Garrett, S. (1961). The role of lawyers in arbitration. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Arbitrators, 102-122.
28.
Giacalone, R.A., Reiner, M.L., & Goodwin, J. (1992). Ethical concerns in grievance arbitration. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 267-272.
29.
Glaser, J. (2005). Intergroup bias and inequity: Legitimizing beliefs and policy attitudes. Social Justice Research, 18, 257-282.
30.
Glass, J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mothers' wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31, 367-394.
31.
Goldberg, S.B. (2007). What Happens After the Arbitrator's Award. In S. F. Befort & P. F. Gerhart (Eds.), Arbitration 2006: Taking Stock in a New Century (pp. 229-251). Arlington, VA: The Bureau of National Affairs.
32.
Graetz, M.J., & Shapiro, I. (2005). Death by a thousand cuts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Gross, J.A. (1997). Value judgments in arbitration: Their impact on the parties' arguments and on the arbitrators' decisions. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Arbitrators , 212-234.
34.
Heilman, M.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
35.
Hendrix, G.H. (2001). Reactions to male and female employees requesting family leave for childcare and eldercare (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 585.
36.
Jacoby, W. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes . American Journal of Political Science, 35, 178-205.
37.
Jost, J.T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.
38.
Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
39.
Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
40.
Katz, I., & Hass, R.G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
41.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Kessler, L.T. (2001). The attachment gap: Employment discrimination law, women's cultural caregiving, and the limits of economic and liberal legal theory. University of Michigan Journal of Legal Reform, 34, 378-380.
43.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
44.
Kurdek, L.A. (1988). Correlates of negative attitudes toward homosexuals in heterosexual college students. Sex Roles, 18, 727-738.
45.
Lambert, A.J., & Raichle, K. (2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgments of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility, and legitimization hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 853-863.
46.
Larwood, L., Rand, P., & Hovanessian, D. (1979). Sex differences in response to simulated employee discipline cases. Personnel Psychology , 32, 539-550.
47.
Lee, R.D., & Rasinski, K.A. (2006). Five grams of coke: Racism, moralism, and White public opinion on sanctions for first-time possession . International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 183-191.
48.
Malin, M., Still, M.C., Milligan, M.K., & Williams, J. (2004). Work-family conflict union style: Labor arbitrations involving family care. American University Center for Worklife Law. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from www.wcl.american.edu/gender/worklifelaw/publications/conflictunionstyle.pdf
49.
Martin, C.D. (2000). More than the work: Race and gender differences in caregiving burden. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 986-1005.
50.
National Academy of Arbitrators. (2007). Organization Web site. Available at http://www.naarb.org/member_guidelines.html
51.
Oswald, S.L., & Caudill, S.B. (1991). Experimental evidence of gender effects in arbitration decisions. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 271-281.
52.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
53.
Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis . Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
54.
Presser, H.B. (1999, June 11). Toward a 24-hour economy. Science, 284, 1778-1779.
55.
Prickett v. Circuit Science Inc., 518 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. 1994).
56.
Reyna, C., Henry, P.J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2005). Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 90, 109-128.
57.
Sidanius, J. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 127, 311-322.
58.
Smith, P.R. (2004). Elder care, gender, and work: The work-family issue of the 21st century. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 25, 355-360.
59.
Stiefel, H. (1992). The labor arbitration process: Survey of the New York State Bar Association labor and employment law section. The Labor Lawyer, 8, 971-983.
60.
Still, M.C. (2006). Litigating the maternal wall: U.S. lawsuits charging discrimination against workers with family responsibilities. Center for WorkLife Law. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/FRDreport.pdf
61.
Tetlock, P.E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
62.
Tetlock, P.E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.
63.
Tetlock, P.E., Visser, P.S., Singh, R., Polifroni, M., Scott, A., Elson, S.B., et al. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 195-209.
64.
United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 168 F. Supp. 308 (D. W. Va. 1958), modified and remanded, 269 F.2d 327 (4th Cir. 1959), rev'd, 363 U.S. 593 (1960).
65.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003, June). Children's living arrangements and characteristics: March 2002. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p20-547.pdf
66.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ( 2007). Enforcement guidance: Unlawful disparate treatment of workers with caregiving responsibilities. Available at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/caregiving.html
67.
Williams, J.C. (2006). One sick child away from being fired: When "opting out" is not an option. Center for WorkLife Law. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/onesickchild.pdf
68.
Williams, J.C., & Segal, N. (2003). Beyond the maternal wall: Relief for family caregivers who are discriminated against on the job. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 26, 77-162.
69.
Wilson, T.D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin , 116, 117-142.
