The results of two experiments supported the hypothesis that, for sexist men, exposure to sexist humor can promote the behavioral release of prejudice against women. Experiment 1 demonstrated that hostile sexism predicted the amount of money participants were willing to donate to a women's organization after reading sexist jokes but not after reading nonhumorous sexist statements or neutral jokes. Experiment 2 showed that hostile sexism predicted the amount of money participants cut from the budget of a women's organization relative to four other student organizations upon exposure to sexist comedy skits but not neutral comedy skits. A perceived local norm of approval of funding cuts for the women's organization mediated the relationship between hostile sexism and discrimination against the women's organization.
Apte, M.L. (1987). Ethnic humor versus “sense of humor”: An American sociocultural dilemma. American Behavioral Scientist , 30, 27-41.
3.
Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal ofPragmatics, 19, 537-558.
4.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Berlyne, D.E. (1972). Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 43-60). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Bill, B., & Naus, P. (1992). The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles, 27, 645-664.
7.
Blanchard, F.A., Crandall, C.S., Brigham, J.C., & Vaughn, L.A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology , 79, 993-997.
Butland, M.J., & Ivy, D.K. (1990). The effects of biological sex and egalitarianism on humor appreciation: Replication and extension. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 353-366.
10.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Crandall, C.S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin,129, 414-446.
12.
Crandall, C.S., & Ferguson, M.A. (2005, September). Prejudice and prejudices: Resistance to social change is at the heart of prejudice. Paper presented at the conference “Looking Toward the Future: Discrimination and Prejudice in the 21st Century,” Madison, Wisconsin.
13.
Crosby, F., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin,87, 546-563.
14.
Devine, P.G., Monteith, M.J., Zuwerink, J.R., & Elliot, A.J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830.
15.
Devine, P.G., Plant, E.A., Amodio, D.M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S.L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835-848.
16.
Fine, G.A. (1983). Sociological approaches to the study of humor . In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (pp. 159-181). New York: Springer-Verlag .
17.
Ford, T.E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094-1107.
18.
Ford, T.E., & Ferguson, M. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79-94.
19.
Ford, T.E., Ferguson, M.A., Fitzgerald, C.M., & Kalair, S. (2004, October). The effect of sexist humor on men's tolerance of sexism: The role of norm saliency. Mt. Pleasant: Michigan Sociological Association.
20.
Ford, T.E., & Lorion, J. (2000, November). Perceptions of social norms implied by sexist humor: The moderating role of hostile sexism. Seattle, WA: National Communication Association.
21.
Ford, T.E., Wentzel, E.R., & Lorion, J. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677-691.
22.
Francis, R.G. (1988). Some sociology of humor: The joke. International Social Science Review, 63, 431-446.
23.
Frey, D.L., & Gaertner, S.L. (1986). Helping and the avoidance of inappropriate interracial behavior: A strategy that perpetuates a nonprejudiced self-image. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1083-1090.
24.
Gaertner, S.L., & Bickman, L. (1971). Effects of race on the elicitation of helping behavior: The wrong number technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 218-222.
25.
Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
27.
Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L.M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men's and women's reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 26, 341-350.
28.
Gruner, C.R. (1997). The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
29.
Henkin, B., & Fish, J.M. (1986). Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Psychology, 120, 157-175.
30.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Khoury, R.M. (1985). Norm formation, social conformity, and the confederating function of humor. Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 159-165.
32.
LaFrance, M., & Woodzicka, J.A. (1998). No laughing matter: Women's verbal and nonverbal reactions to sexist humor. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 61-80). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
33.
Lewis, C.S. (1942). The screwtape letters. New York: HarperCollins.
34.
MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., & Rucker, D.D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
35.
Mannell, R.C. (1977). Vicarious superiority, injustice, and aggression in humor: The role of the playful “judgmental set.” In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humor (pp. 273-276). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
36.
McGhee, P.E. (1972). On the cognitive origins of incongruity humor: Fantasy assimilation versus reality assimilation. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 61-79). New York: Academic Press.
37.
Monteith, M.J., Deenen, N.E., & Tooman, G.D. (1996). The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and Blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 267-288.
38.
Monteith, M.J., Devine, P.G., & Zuwerink, J.R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 198-210.
39.
Mulkay, M. (1988). On humor: Its nature and its place in modern society . New York: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Plant, E.A., & Devine, P.G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
41.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
42.
Ryan, K., & Kanjorski, J. (1998). The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles , 38, 743-756.
43.
Sechrist, G.B., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 645-654.
44.
Sechrist, G.B., Stangor, C., & Killen, M. (2005). Prejudice as social norms. In C. S. Crandall & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 163-183). Lawrence, KS: Lewinian.
45.
Sev'er, A., & Ungar, S. (1997). No laughing matter: Boundaries of gender-based humour in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 87-105.
46.
Stangor, C., Sechrist, G.B., & Jost, J.T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486-496.
47.
Swim, J.K., Aikin, K.J., Hall, W.S., & Hunter, B.A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
48.
Thomas, C.A., & Esses, V.M. (2004). Individual differences in reactions to sexist humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 89-100.
49.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A.M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus Ca change, plus C'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
50.
Viki, G.T., Thoma, M., & Hamid, S. (2006). Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humor on men's self-reported rape proclivity. Unpublished manuscript , University of Kent, Canterbury , United Kingdom.
51.
Wells, G.L., & Windschitl, P.D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
52.
Wittenbrink, B., & Henly, J.R. (1996). Creating social reality: Informational social influence and content of stereotypic beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 598-610.
