Because angry people apparently rely on heuristic cues when making judgments, anger has been claimed to trigger superficial, nonanalytic information processing. In three studies, the authors found that induced anger promoted analytic processing. Experiment 1 showed that angry participants were more likely to discriminate between weak and strong arguments than participants in neutral moods. Experiment 2 demonstrated that anger overrode dispositional preferences not to process, causing even those low in need for cognition to process analytically. Experiment 3 reconciled these findings with previous work by showing that angry people used accessible, valid, and relevant heuristics but otherwise processed analytically, as indicated by attitude change and elaboration data. Together, these experiments showed that angry people can have both the capacity and motivation to process and that their selective use of heuristics reflects the cue's perceived validity and not the failure to process analytically.
Albarracín, D., & Kumkale, G.T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 834-845.
2.
Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R.S. (2001). Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 691-705.
3.
Averill, J.R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.
4.
Bargh, J.A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). New York: Guilford.
5.
Baron, R.A. (1977). Human aggression. New York : Plenum.
6.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control . New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345.
9.
Bodenhausen, G.V., Sheppard, L.A., & Kramer, G.P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology , 24, 45-62.
10.
Briñol, P., Petty, R.E., & Wheeler, S.C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 154-170.
11.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
12.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
13.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 10, 3-12.
14.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson , & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
16.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
17.
Claypool, H.M., Mackie, D.M., Garcia-Marques, T., McIntosh, A., & Udal, A. (2004). The effects of personal relevance and repetition on persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 22, 310-355.
18.
DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M.Y., & Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic inter-group attitudes. Psychological Science , 15, 319-324.
19.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R.E., Rucker, D.D., Wegener, D.T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 43-56.
20.
Dunn, J.R., Schweitzer, M.E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736-748.
21.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
22.
Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R.M., Lerner, J.S., & Small, D.A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 11, 124-139.
23.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM) . Psychology Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
25.
Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Geen, R.G. (1995) Human aggression. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 383-418). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Henry, J.P. (1986). Neuroendocrine patterns of emotional response . In R. Plutchick & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (Vol. 3, pp. 37-60). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Thompson, E.P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
29.
Lambert, A.J., Khan, S.R., Lickel, B.A., & Fricke, K. (1997). Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72, 1002-1016.
30.
Lazarus, R.S. (1981). The stress and the coping paradigm. In C. Eisdorfer, D. Cohen, A. Kleinman, & P. Maxim (Eds.), Models for clinical psychopathology (pp. 177-183, 192-201). Jamaica, NY: Spectrum.
31.
Lerner, J.S., Goldberg, J.H., & Tetlock, P.E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 563-574.
32.
Lerner, J.S., & Gonzalez, R.M. (2005). Forecasting one's future based on fleeting subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 454-466.
33.
Lerner, J.S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159.
34.
Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York : John Wiley.
35.
McCoy, S.K. (2004). A double edged sword: Ideology and self-esteem among low status groups (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2004 ). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 4112.
36.
McCoy, S.K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005-1017.
37.
Parrott, D.J., Zeichner, A., & Evces, M. (2005). Effect of trait anger on cognitive processing of emotional stimuli. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 67-80.
38.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York : Springer-Verlag.
39.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
40.
Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill .
41.
Ric, F. ( 2004). Effects of the activation of affective information on stereotyping: When sadness increases stereotype use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1310-1321.
42.
Roseman, I.J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11-36.
43.
Russell, J.A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.
44.
Schachter, S. (1964). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 49-79). New York: Academic Press.
45.
Scherer, K.R. (1982). Emotion as a process: Function, origin, and regulation . Social Science Information, 21, 555-570.
46.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2., pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
47.
Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning . Psychological Bulletin,119, 3-22.
48.
Smith, C.A. (1989). Dimensions of appraisal and physiological response in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 339-353.
49.
Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
50.
Smith, C.A., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
51.
Smith, C.A., & Lazarus, R.S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233-269.
52.
Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Gschneidinger, E. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460-1469.
54.
Tiedens, L.Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions in information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973-988.
55.
Walley, R.E., & Weiden, T.D. (1973). Lateral inhibition and cognitive masking: A neuropsychological theory of attention. Psychological Review, 4, 284-302.
56.
Wegener, D.T., & Petty, R.E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.
57.
Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., & Smith, S.M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5-15.
