Measures of adult attachment reflect both respondents' broadly generalized styles as well as bonds with specific attachment figures. Using Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, and Rajaratnam's (1972) Multivariate Generalizability analyses, the authors estimated the extent to which correlations among attachment, affect, the self, and perceived social support occurred for both styles and bonds. In two studies, participants rated attachment, affect, the self, and perceived support when thinking about their mothers, fathers, and romantic partners. In both studies, attachment dimensions reflected specific bonds much more so than generalized styles. When correlations reflected specific bonds, both anxious and avoidant dimensions were strongly linked to high negative affect, low positive affect, and low perceived support. In contrast, evidence for links between attachment and affect was inconclusive when correlations reflected generalized styles. Links between attachment and the self depended on the type of self-construct and whether styles or bonds were analyzed.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Andersen, S. M., Reznik, I., & Manzella, L. M. (1996). Eliciting facial affect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: Significant other representations in social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1108-1129.
3.
Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 94-109.
4.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Brennan, R. L. (2001a). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.
6.
Brennan, R. L. (2001b). Manual for mGENOVA (Version 2.1). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs Occasional Papers (Number 50).
7.
Buist, K. L., Dekovic, M., Meeus, W. H., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2004). Attachment in adolescence: A social relations model analysis. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 826-850.
8.
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of attachment:Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.
9.
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053-1073.
10.
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363-383.
11.
Collins, N. L., Guichard, A. C., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment: New developments and emerging themes. In S. W. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 196-239). New York: Guilford.
12.
Cook, W. L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500-509.
13.
Cook, W. L. (2000). Understanding attachment security in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 285-294.
14.
Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Davis, M. H., Morris, M. M., & Kraus, L. A. (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: Associations with well-being and attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 468-481.
16.
Fraley, C. R., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2004). A dynamical systems approach to conceptualizing and studying stability and change in attachment security. In S. W. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 86-132). New York: Guilford.
17.
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical development, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.
18.
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.
19.
Gonnerman, M. E., Jr., Parker, C. P., Lavine, H., & Huff, J. (2000). The relationship between self-discrepancies and affective states: The moderating roles of self-monitoring and standpoints on the self. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 810-819.
20.
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430-445.
21.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
22.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
23.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
24.
Higgins, E. T., Bond, R., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1986). Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 5-15.
25.
Kenny, D. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York. Guilford.
26.
Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
27.
Kenny, D. A., & Winquist, L. A. (2001). The measurement of inter-personal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Kobak, R. (1999). The emotional dynamics of disruptions in attachment relationships: Implication for theory, research and clinical intervention. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications(pp. 21-43). New York: Guilford.
29.
Lakey, B., Lutz, C. J., & Scoboria, A. (2004). The information used to judge supportiveness depends on whether the judgment reflects the personality of perceivers, the objective characteristics of targets or their unique relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 796-814.
30.
Lakey, B., & Scoboria, A. (2005). The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 73, 361-388.
31.
Merlo, L. J. (2005). The relative contribution of trait and social influences in the links among adolescent attachment, coping and depressive symptoms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
32.
Mikulincer, M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1203-1215.
33.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Security-based self-representations in adulthood: Contents and processes. In S. W. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 159-195). New York: Guilford.
34.
Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Neely, L. C., Lakey, B., Cohen, J. L., Barry, R., Orehek, E., Abeare, C. A., et al. (2006). Trait and social processes in the link between social support and affect: An experimental laboratory investigation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1015-1046.
36.
Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991) General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1023-1039.
37.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others?Review of General Psychology, 4, 155-175.
38.
Rholes, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2004a). Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York: Guilford.
39.
Rholes, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2004b). Attachment theory: Basic concepts and contemporary questions. In S. W. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 3-14). New York: Guilford.
40.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, S. W. (2004). Anxious attachment and depressive symptoms: An interpersonal perspective. In S. W. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 408-437). New York: Guilford.
41.
SPSS, Inc. (2002). SPSS for Windows (Release 11.5.0). Chicago: Author.
42.
Strauman, T. J. (1989) Self-discrepancies in clinical depression and social phobia: Cognitive structures that underlie emotional disorders?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 14-22.
43.
Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1987). Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: When cognitive structures influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1004-1014.
44.
Strodl, E., & Noller, P. (2003). The relationship of adult attachment dimensions to depression and agoraphobia. Personal Relationships, 10, 171-185.
45.
Strube, M. J. (2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In G. G. Laurence & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 23-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
