A new circumplex model of interpersonal interaction emphasizes the motives that drive interpersonal behaviors and the negative affect (such as anger) that occurs when a strongly activated motive is frustrated. This study examined the model experimentally by varying conditions designed to activate and frustrate interpersonal motives. One hundred twenty-nine students engaged in text-based discussions using a computer. Three factors were varied: (a) activation of interpersonal motives— participants believed the interaction was interpersonal (with a human) or noninterpersonal (with a computer); (b) individual differences in motive activation—assertive and nonassertive participants were compared (strong vs. weak motive to influence others); and (c) level of frustration of activated motives—the “partner's” messages contained dominating or nondominating language. Participants who believed their interaction was interpersonal produced more interpersonal behaviors of various types. Assertive participants who interacted with a dominating and apparently human partner produced a disproportionate amount of hostility, indicating anger ascribed to frustrated motives.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin,120(3), 338-375.
2.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Boston: Beacon.
3.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Carson, R. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
6.
Clark, H. (1997). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Clark, H. (2000). How do real people communicate with virtual partners? Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Citera, M. (1992). A goal hierarchy model of personality motivation and leadership. Research in Organizational Behavior,15, 267-322.
9.
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy: An analyses in terms of learning, thinking, and culture. New York: McGraw.
10.
Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,72(3), 592-603.
11.
Emmons, R. A. (1989). The personal striving approach to personality. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology(pp. 87-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Hobbs, J. R., & Evans, D. A. (1980). Conversation as planned behavior. Cognitive Science,4, 349-377.
13.
Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.
14.
Horowitz, L. (2004). The interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67-86.
16.
Kiesler, D. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185-214.
17.
Kiesler, D. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York: John Wiley.
18.
Klinger, E. (1987). The interview questionnaire technique: Reliability and validity of a mixed idiographic-nomothetic measure of motivation. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 6, pp. 1-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Lafferty, J., & Eady, P. (1974). The Desert Survival Problem. Plymouth, MI: Experimental Learning Methods.
20.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
22.
Little, B. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and methods for investigation. Environmental Behavior,15, 273-309.
23.
Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877-889.
24.
Locke, K. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment,75, 249-267.
25.
Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2003). Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29, 1082-1090.
26.
McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford.
27.
Moon, Y. (1996). Similarity effects in human computer interaction: Effects of user personality, computer personality, and user control on attraction and attributions of responsibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
28.
Moskowitz, D. S., & Cote, S. (1995). Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 915-924.
29.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues,56, 81-103.
30.
Orford, J. (1986). The rules of interpersonal complementarity: Does hostility beget hostility and dominance, submission?Psychological Review,93(3), 365-377.
31.
Person, E. (2000). The effect of polite language on the assertive person's reaction to advice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
32.
Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84, 80-96.
33.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Strong, S. R., Hills, H. I., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., & Nelson, B. N. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,54(5), 798-810.
35.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
36.
Tiedens, L., & Fragale, A. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,84(3), 558-568.
37.
Weckler, D. A. (1981). Personality, small group process, and performance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37(3), 395-412.
39.
Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research,23, 517-530.
