Many environmental problems are resource dilemmas that contain two components–social and temporal–that encourage individuals not to act in the best interest of the group. Most research has focused on the social component. The authors examined the importance of the temporal component in two resource dilemma tasks. Participants (N = 112) reported their willingness to limit resource consumption in response to hypothetical dilemmas and forfeited extra credit points in response to a real dilemma. Cooperation rates were higher when the temporal dilemma was diminished, when uncertainty about environmental impacts was low, and for women. Individuals high in both proenvironmentalism and consideration of future consequences sustained high levels of cooperation even in the face of strong temporal dilemmas.
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984) Cluster analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences(Vol. 44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Berndsen, M.,& van der Pligt, J. (2001). Time is onmy side: Optimism in intertemporal choice. Acta Psychologica, 108, 173-186.
3.
Biel, A., & Garling, T. (1995). The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 221-233.
4.
Budescu, D. V., Suleiman, R., & Rapoport, A. (1995). Positional order and group size in resource dilemmas with uncertain resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 225-238.
5.
Chapman, G. B. (1998). Sooner or later: The psychology of intertemporal choice. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 38, pp. 83-111). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Chapman, G. B. (2001). Time preferences in the very long term. Acta Psychologica, 108, 95-116.
7.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
8.
De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2002). Perceived criticality and contributions in public good dilemmas: A matter of feeling responsible to all?Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 319-332.
9.
de la Torre, S., Snowdon, C. T., & Bejarano, M. (2000). Effects of human activities on wild pygmy marmosets in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Biological Conservation, 94, 153-163.
10.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results: The “new environmental paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
11.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
12.
Ebenbach, D. H. (1999). Behind beliefs and controversies: The relationship between motivation and the expression of pro-environmental attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
13.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2003). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice(pp. 13-86). New York: Russell Sage.
15.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (Eds.). (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Garvill, J. (1999). Choice of transportationmode: Factors influencing drivers’ willingness to reduce personal car use and support car regulations. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects(pp. 263-279). New York: Psychology Press.
17.
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J.,& Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
18.
Gustafsson, M., Biel, A., & Garling, T. (1999). Overharvesting of resources of unknown size. Acta Psychologica, 103, 47-64.
19.
Hendrickx, L., & Nicolaij, S. (2004). Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 409-422.
20.
Hendrickx, L., Poortinga, W., & van der Kooij, R. (2001). Temporal factors in resource dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 108, 137-154.
21.
Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., & Nathanson, A. (2000). The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret on behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 345-368.
22.
Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M.,& Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Thosewithaneye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187-206.
23.
Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1342-1353.
24.
Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2000). Of wealth and death: Materialism, mortality salience, and consumption behavior. Psychological Science, 11, 348-351.
25.
Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 287-297.
26.
Kopelman, S., Weber, J. M., & Messick, D. M. (2002) Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, & S. Stonich (Eds.), Drama in the commons(pp. 113-156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Eco-centrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261-272.
28.
Mannix, E. A. (1990). Resource dilemmas and discount rates in decision making groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 379-391.
29.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181-190.
30.
Messick, D. M., & McClelland, C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 105-110.
31.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
32.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933-938.
33.
Nicolaij, S., & Hendrickx, L. (2003). The influence of temporal distance of negative consequences on the evaluation of environmental risks. In L. Hendrickx, W. Jager, & L. Steg (Eds.), Human decision making and environmental perception: Understanding and assisting human decision making in real-life settings(pp. 47-67). Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen.
34.
Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641-651.
35.
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decisionmaking over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770-786.
36.
Rachlin, H. (1989). Judgment, decision, and choice: A cognitive behavioral synthesis. New York: Freeman.
37.
Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., & Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33-45.
38.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2001). HLM version 5.05. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
39.
Roch, S. G., & Samuelson, C. D. (1997). Effects of environmental uncertainty and social value orientation in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 221-235.
40.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681-690.
41.
Smithson, M. (1999). Taking exogenous dynamics seriously in public goods and resource dilemmas. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects(pp. 17-32). New York: Psychology Press.
42.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. L., & Pyszczynski, T. A. (2004). Lethal consumption: Death-denying materialism. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world(pp. 127-146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
44.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighting immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
45.
Svenson, O., & Karlsson, G. (1989). Decision-making, time horizons, and risk in the very long-term perspective. Risk Analysis, 9, 385-399.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas (pp. 3-28). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
48.
Weber, B. J., & Chapman, G. B. (2004). The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 104-118.
