The Carrot and the Stick: Affective Commitment and Acceptance Anxiety as Motives for Discretionary Group Efforts by Respected and Disrespected Group Members

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that intragroup respect can strengthen people’s commitment to the group and encourage them to exert themselves on behalf of it. In the present research, the authors argue that similar behavior can ensue from self-focused concerns when group members are disrespected. Experiment 1 (N = 174) confirms that high respect as well as low respect motivates people to increase their actual discretionary efforts on behalf of the group. These findings were replicated and extended in Experiment 2 (N = 138), where it was established that enhanced efforts only emerge when people consider the way they are evaluated by others as diagnostic for their position in the group. In addition, it is demonstrated that whereas the efforts of respected people were primarily motivated by affective commitment to the group (group-focused concerns), the behavior of disrespected people was driven by anxiety about their acceptance into the group (self-focused concerns).

Keywords

respect disrespect discretionary group efforts affective commitment acceptance anxiety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barreto, M. , & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.

Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.

Branscombe, N. R. , Spears, R. , Ellemers, N. , & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluations on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753.

Brennan, K. A. , Clark, C. L. , & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. F. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford.

De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341.

De Cremer, D. (2003). Noneconomic motives predicting cooperation in public good dilemmas: The effect of received respect on contributions. Social Justice Research, 16, 367-377.

Eisenberger, N. I. , Lieberman, M. D. , & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292.

Ellemers, N. , De Gilder, D. , & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.

Ellemers, N. , De Gilder, D. , & Van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717-730.

10.

Ellemers, N. , Doosje, B. , & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.

11.

Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 123-140.

12.

Harkins, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-18.

13.

Jehn, K. A. , & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.

14.

Jetten, J. , Branscombe, N. R. , & Spears, R. (2002). On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 105-123.

15.

Jetten, J. , Branscombe, N. R. , Spears, R. , & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.

16.

Karau, S. J. , & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytical review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.

17.

Lind, E. A. , & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York. Plenum.

18.

Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.

19.

Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.

20.

Noel, J. , Wann, D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.

21.

Schmader T. , Major B. , Eccleston C. P. , & McCoy S. K. (2001). Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: Perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.

22.

Simon, B. , & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.

23.

Sleebos, E. , Ellemers, N. , & DeGilder, D. (in press). The paradox of the disrespected: Disrespected group members’ engagement in group-serving efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

24.

Smith, E. R. , Murphy, J. , & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.

25.

Smith, H. J. , Tyler, T. R. , & Huo, Y. J. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity, and organizational behavior. In S. A. Haslam , D. van Knipppenberg , M. Platow , & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155-172). London: Psychology Press.

26.

Spears, R. , Ellemers, N. , & Doosje, B. (2005). Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: Does competence compensate or compromise lack of liking from the group? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 263-280.

27.

Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261-302.

28.

Tyler, T. R. , & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

29.

Tyler, T. R. , & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.

30.

Tyler, T. R. , & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.

31.

Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford.

32.

Williams, K. D. , Cheung, C. K. T. , & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.

33.

Williams, K. D. , & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.

34.

Williams, K. D. , Karau, S. J. , & Bourgeois, M. (1993). Working on collective tasks: Social loafing and social compensation. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 130-148). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

35.

Williams, K. D. , & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693-706.