This study examined how meritocracy beliefs may buffer women from the negative psychological effects of an acute situation of gender discrimination. Although some research indirectly suggests that believing that meritocracy exists may increase wellbeing, group consciousness theories suggest that disbelieving that meritocracy exists will enhance psychological adjustment to gender discrimination. Women who reported little past experience with discrimination, and either believed or disbelieved that meritocracy exists, were exposed to either a laboratory situation of discrimination or a nondiscrimination failure (control) condition. Consistent with group consciousness theories, women experiencing discrimination reported greater well-being if they disbelieved that meritocracy exists than if they were believers. In contrast, women in the control condition reported greater wellbeing if they believed that meritocracy exists than if they were disbelievers. Implications for coping with discrimination are discussed.
Allison, K. W. (1998). Stress and oppressed category membership. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective(pp. 145-170). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
Bartky, S. L. (1977) Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness. In M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston, & J. English (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy(pp. 22-37). Totawa, NJ: Littlefield.
3.
Birt, C. M., & Dion, K. L. (1987). Relative deprivation theory and responses to discrimination in a gaymale and lesbian sample. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 139-145.
4.
Bowles, G., & Klein, R. D. (1983). Theories of women's studies. London: Routledge.
5.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
6.
Brush, L. R., Gold, A. R.,& White, M. G. (1978). The paradox of intention and effect: A woman's studies course. Signs, 3, 870-883.
7.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
8.
Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
9.
Dalbert, C., Fisch, U., & Montada, L. (1992). Is inequality unjust? Evaluating women's career chances. European Review of Applied Psychology, 42, 11-18.
10.
Dion, K. L., & Kawakami, K. (1996). Ethnicity and perceived discrimination in Toronto: Another look at the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 203-213.
11.
Driefus, C. (1973). Women's fate: Rap froma feminist consciousness-raising group. New York: Bantam.
12.
Foster, M. D. (1999). Acting out against discrimination: The effects of different social identities. Sex Roles, 40, 167-186.
13.
Foster, M. D. (2000). Positive and negative responses to personal discrimination: Does coping make a difference?Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 93-106.
14.
Foster, M. D. (2001). The motivational quality of global attributions in hypothetical and experienced situations of gender discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 242-253.
15.
Foster, M. D., & Dion, K. L. (2003). Dispositional hardiness and women's well-being relating to gender discrimination: The role of minimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 197-208.
16.
Foster, M. D., & Dion, K. L. (2004). The role of hardiness inmoderating the relationship between global/specific attributions and actions against discrimination. Sex Roles, 51, 161-169.
17.
Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167-1177.
18.
Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1999). Perceiving and responding to the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1319-1329.
19.
Foster, M. D., Matheson, K., & Poole, M. (1994). Responding to sexual discrimination: The effects of societal versus self-blame. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 743-754.
20.
Foster, M. D., Sloto, L., & Ruby, R. J. (in press). Meritocracy beliefs, personal discrimination and well-being: The benefits of post-shattered assumptions over shattered assumptions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
21.
Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1993). Beliefs in a just world, discontent and assertive actions by working women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 30-38.
22.
Heatherton, T. F.,& Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
23.
Helgeson, V. S. (1992). Moderators of the relation between perceived control and adjustment to chronic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 656-666.
24.
Helgeson, V. S. (1999). Applicability of cognitive adaptation theory to predicting adjustment to heart disease after coronary angioplasty. Health Psychology, 18, 561-569.
25.
Helgeson, V. S. (2003a). Cognitive adaptation, psychological adjustment, and disease progression among angioplasty patients: 4 years later. Health Psychology, 22, 30-38.
26.
Helgeson, V. S. (2003b). Unmitigated communion and adjustment to breast cancer: Associations and explanations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1643-1661.
27.
Helgeson, V. S.,& Taylor, W. E. (1993). Social comparisons and adjustment among cardiac patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1171-1195.
28.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113-136.
29.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
30.
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I.H(1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1-17.
31.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
32.
Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives of ideology, justice and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Klonoff, E. A., Landrine, H., & Campbell, R. (2000). Sexist discrimination may account for well-known gender differences in psychiatric symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 93-99.
34.
Kluegal, J. R., & Smith, P. M. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
35.
Koole, S. L., Smeets, K., van Knippenberg, A., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1999). The cessation of rumination through self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 111-125.
36.
Krieger, N.,& Sidney, S. (1996). Racial discrimination and blood pressure: The CARDIA study. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 1370-1378.
37.
Lalonde, R. N., Doan, L., & Patterson, L. A. (2000). Political correctness beliefs, threatened identities, and social attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 317-336.
38.
Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Gibbs, J., Manning, V., & Lund, M. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination: An application of the schedule of sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 473-492.
39.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
40.
Lipkus, I. M.,& Siegler, I. C. (1992). The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination. Journal of Psychology, 127, 465-474.
41.
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124-133.
42.
Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
43.
Major, B., Quinton, W. L., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 34, pp. 251-330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
Matheson, K., Ofleh, I., Kelly, O., & Anisman, H. (2004). Discrimination as a traumatic event: Implications for psychological and neuroendocrine functioning. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.
45.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. T. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
46.
Schmader, T., Major, B.,& Gramzow, R. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93-111.
47.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one's gender group has different implications for well-being in women andmen. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197-210.
48.
Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509.
49.
Stake, J. E., & Gerner, M. A. (1987). The women's studies experience: Personal and professional gains for men and women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 277-284.
50.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press.
51.
Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective(pp. 37-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceivingmy group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-263.
53.
Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161-1173.
54.
Taylor, S. E., Lichtman, R. R., & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 489-502.
55.
Updegraff, J. A., Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., & Wyatt, G. E. (2002). Positive and negative effects of HIV infection in women with low socioeconomic resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 392-394.
56.
Weitz, R. (1982). Feminist consciousness raising, self-concept, and depression. Sex Roles, 8, 231-241.
57.
Wood, J. V., Taylor, S. E., & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1169-1183.
58.
Worell, J., Stilwell, D., Oakley, D., & Robinson, D. (1999). Educating about women and gender: Cognitive, personal and professional outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 797-811.
59.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
