This study examined how perceived position and velocity regarding approach and avoidance in romantic relationships relate to affective experiences. The authors hypothesized that perceived progress toward intimacy would predict positive affect and that perceived movement toward conflict would predict anxious affect. Ninety-two romantic couples recorded perceived levels of, and perceived changes in, both intimacy and conflict twice daily throughout 10 consecutive days using electronic palm-top devices. Multilevel modeling demonstrated that perceived increase in intimacy related to positive affect above and beyond perceptions of intimacy, conflict, and changes in conflict, for both male and female partners. Perceived increase in conflict related to anxious affect above and beyond perceptions of conflict, intimacy, and changes in intimacy, but only among male partners. Findings support a dual-process view of these feelings in romantic relationships and suggest that increases in positive feelings in close relationships depend on enhancing intimacy rather than on decreasing conflict.
Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Urrows, S., Higgins, P., Abeles, M., Hall, C., et al. (1998). Fibromyalgia and women’s pursuit of personal goals: A daily process analysis. Health Psychology, 17, 40-47.
2.
Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 49-96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
4.
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (2001). Shared self-expanding activities as a means of maintaining and enhancing close romantic relationships. In J. H. Harvey & A. E. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 47-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Barlow, D. H. (2000). Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. American Psychologist, 55, 1247-1263.
6.
Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 46-67.
7.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
8.
Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, T.L. Huston, G. Levinger, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110-168). New York: Freeman.
9.
Berscheid, E. (1991). The emotion-in-relationships model: Reflections and update. In W. Kessen & A. Ortony (Eds.), Memories, thoughts, and emotions: Essays in honor of George Mandler (pp. 323-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Berscheid, E., & Ammazzalorso, H. (2001). Emotional experience in close relationships. In G.J.O. Fletcher&M.S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 308-330). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
12.
Booth, A., Crouter, A. C., & Clements, M. (2001). Couples in conflict. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061-1070.
15.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
16.
Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345-356.
17.
Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3-22.
18.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
19.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
21.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
22.
Davidson, R. J. (1984). Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization. In C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajanc (Eds.), Emotion, cognition, and behavior (pp. 320-365). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307-330.
24.
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491-517.
25.
Depue, R. A., & Zald, D. H. (1993). Biological and environmental processes in nonpsychotic psychopathology: A neurobehavioral perspective. In C.G. Costello (Ed.), Basic issues in psychopathology (pp. 127-237). New York: Guilford.
26.
Feldman Barrett, L. (2000). Experience sampling program. Boston: Boston College. Retrieved from http://www2.bc.edu/%7Ebarretli/esp/index.html
27.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175-185.
28.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967-984.
29.
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Marital conflict: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47-77.
30.
Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage?Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489-502.
31.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 148-163.
32.
Fowles, D. C. (1993). Biological variables in psychopathology: A psychobiological perspective. In P. A. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 57-82). New York: Plenum.
33.
Frye, N. E., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Being better or getting better? Social and temporal comparisons as coping mechanisms in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1287-1299.
34.
Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2001). Appetitive and aversive social interaction. In J.H. Harvey&A.E. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationship maintenance and enhancement (pp. 169-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A., J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 419-435.
36.
Geist, R. L., & Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 49-60.
37.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York: W.W. Norton&Company.
39.
Gray, J. A. (1994a). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 329-331). New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Gray, J. A. (1994b). Three fundamental emotion systems. In P. Ekman &R.J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 243-247). New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Guerrero, L. K., & Andersen, P. A. (2000). Emotion in close relationships. In C. Hendrick & S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 171-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. (1997). Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: Covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 159-163.
43.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: Asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1310-1316.
44.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. (1987). Passionate love: New directions in research. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 109-139.
45.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. (1993). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history. New York: HarperCollins.
46.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus: Affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 91-114). New York: Guilford.
47.
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
48.
Hsee, C. K., & Abelson, R. P. (1991). Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 341-347.
49.
Hsee, C. K., Abelson, R. P., & Salovey, P. (1991). The relative weighting of position and velocity in satisfaction. Psychological Science, 2, 263-266.
50.
Hsee, C. K., Salovey, P., & Abelson, R. P. (1994). The quasi-acceleration relation: Satisfaction as a function of the change of velocity of outcome over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 96-111.
51.
Hufford, M. R., & Shields, A. L. (2002). Electronic diaries: Applications and what works in the field. Applied Clinical Trials, 11, 46-59.
52.
Huston, T.L., Caughlin, J.P., Houts, R.M., Smith, S.E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237-252.
53.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075-1092.
54.
Karney, B. R., & Coombs, R. H. (2000). Memory bias in long-term close relationships: Consistency or improvement?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 959-970.
55.
Karney, B. R., & Frye, N. E. (2002). “But we’ve been getting better lately”: Comparing prospective and retrospective views of relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 222-238.
56.
Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372-385.
57.
Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (in press). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes [Special issue: Methodology]. Journal of Family Psychology.
58.
Laurenceau, J.-P., Feldman Barrett, L., & Rovine, M.J. (in press). Intimacy in marriage: A daily diary approach. Journal of Family Psychology.
59.
Laurenceau, J.-P., Feldman Barrett, L., & Pietromonaco, P.R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.
60.
Laurenceau, J.-P., Rivera, L.M., Schaffer, A., & Pietromonaco, P.R. (2004). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: Current status and future directions (pp. 61-78). In D. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Lawrence, J. W., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Velocity toward goal attainment in immediate experience as a determinant of affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 788-802.
62.
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 56-68.
63.
Levine, L. J., & Safer, M. A. (2002). Sources of bias in memory for emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 169-173.
64.
Mandler, G. (1980). The generation of emotion: A psychological theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience: Vol. I. Theories of emotion (pp. 219-242). New York: Academic Press.
65.
McAdams, D. P. (1992). Intimacy: The need to be close. New York: Doubleday.
66.
Peplau, L., & Gordon, S. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. O’Leary, R. Unger, & B. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 257-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161-174.
68.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Reis, H. T. (1990). The role of intimacy in interpersonal relations. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 15-30.
70.
Reis, H., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204-1217.
71.
Reis, H., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 367-389). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
72.
Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L., Gessner, T. L., Chronsniak, L. D., & Cortina, J. M. (2000). The looming maladaptive style: Anxiety, danger, and schematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 837-852.
73.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
74.
Sanderson, C. A., & Cantor, N. (2001). The association of intimacy goals and marital satisfaction: A test of four mediational hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1567-1577.
75.
Sanderson, C. A., & Evans, S. M. (2001). Seeing one’s partner through intimacy-colored glasses: An examination of the processes underlying the intimacy goals-relationship satisfaction link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 463-473.
76.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
77.
Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881-893.
78.
Smith, T. W., Sanders, J. D., & Alexander, J. F. (1990). What does the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale measure? Affect, behavior, and attributions in the marital context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 699-708.
79.
Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, B.J., Broderick, J.E., & Hufford, M. R. (2003). Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24, 182-199.
80.
Troy, A., & Laurenceau, J. -P. (2003). Electronic daily diary methods: Uses, advantages, and limitations for close relationship research. AABT Couples Research and Therapy Newsletter, 9, 3-7. Retrieved from http://www.couplessig.net/newsletters.htm
81.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
82.
Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820-838.
