From a sociological perspective, the fundamental elements necessary for speech to be considered gossip are “face-to-face” evaluative communication between/among persons about an absent third party. Given that Paul was not present when the Galatians—and the “agitators” with them—experienced the initial audition of the epistle via Paul's surrogate, this project will consider the text through the lens of social-semiotics and performance, as well as honor-shame, to underscore why Paul gossips, how he does it, and the risks he takes doing so. It is hoped that some light will be shed on the complex intersection between scribality, orality, performance, and honor when considering the Incident at Antioch, the situation in the Galatian congregations, and Paul's determination to carry on westward with his gospel. I will suggest that Paul's recollection of his altercation with Peter in Antioch at Galatians 2:11-14 amounting to agonistic “epistolary gossip,” constitutes a public challenge to both the “agitators” in Galatia, and perhaps even the “seeming to be leaders/pillars” in Jerusalem.
BruceF. F.1982. The Epistle to the Galatians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
3.
BothaPieter J. J.2012. Orality and Literacy in Early Christianity. Biblical Performance Criticism 5. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
4.
BothaPieter J. J.1998. “Paul and Gossip: A Social Mechanism in the Early Christian Communities.” Neotestamentica32: 267–88.
5.
BothaPieter J. J.1993. “The Social Dynamics of the Early Transmission of the Jesus Tradition.” Neotestamentica27: 205–31.
6.
CosgroveC. H.1998. “Arguing like a Mere Human Being: Galatians 3:15–18 in Rhetorical Perspective.” New Testament Studies34/4, 536–49.
7.
CrookZeba A.2009. “Honor, Shame, and Social Status Revisited .” Journal of Biblical Literature128/3: 591–611.
8.
CrookZeba A.2004a. Reconceptualising Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
DanielsJohn W.2013. Gossiping Jesus: The Oral Processing of Jesus in John's Gospel. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
11.
DanielsJohn W.2012. “Readers Guide—Gossip in the New Testament.” Biblical Theology Bulletin42/4”: 204–13.
12.
DunnJames D. G.1993. The Epistle to the Galatians. London, UK: Hendrickson.
13.
DunnJames D. G.1983. “The incident at Antioch (Gal 2:11–18).” Journal for the Study of the New Testament18: 3–57.
14.
EderDonna, & JannetL. Enke. 1991. “The Structure of Gossip: Opportunities and Constraints on Collective Expression among Adolescents.” American Sociological Review61: 494–508.
GoodwinMarjorie H.1982. “Processes of Dispute Management among Urban Black Children.” American Ethnologist9: 76–96.
21.
GoodwinMarjorie H.1980. “He-Said-She-Said: Formal Cultural Procedures for the Construction of a Gossip Dispute Activity.” American Ethnologist7: 674–95.
22.
GreenwoodA.1998. “Martial, Gossip, and the Language of Rumour.” Toto Notus in Orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation. Palingenesia 65. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
HearonHolly. 2014. “A Social Scientific Multi-Modal Approach to Communication Practices in Early Christianity.” Journal of Early Christian History41/1: 44–67.
25.
HübnerH.1984. “Der Galaterbrief und das Verhältnis von antiker Rhetorik und Epistolographie.” Theologische Literaturzei-tung109/4: 241–50.
26.
JohnsonLee A.2017. “Paul's Letters Reheard: A Performance-Critical Examination of the Preparation, Transportation, and Delivery of Paul's Correspondence.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly79/1: 60–76.
27.
KartzowMarianne B.2009. Gossip and Gender: Othering of Speech in the Pastoral Epistles. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
28.
KartzowMarianne B.2005. “Female Gossipers and Their Reputation in the Pastoral Epistles.” Neotestamentica39: 255–72.
29.
KennedyGeorge. 1984. New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
30.
KressGunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication.London, UK: Routledge.
31.
LongeneckerRichard N.1990. Galatians. Dallas, TX: Word Books.
32.
MalinaBruce, & JohnPilch. 2006. Social-Science Commentary on the Letters of Paul. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
33.
MartynJ. Louis. 1997. Galatians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York, NY: Doubleday.
34.
PaineRobert. 1967. “What is Gossip? An Alternative Hypothe-sis.” Man2: 278–85.
35.
RohrbaughRichard L.2001. “Gossip in the New Testament.” Pp. 239–59 in Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible, edited by JohnJ. Pilch. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
36.
StewartEric. 2011. “I'm okay, you're not okay: Constancy of character and Paul's understanding of change in his own and Peter's behavior.” HTS Theological Studies67/3. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v67i3.1002.
