Embedded in the collection of tales about the prophet Elisha is a series of three inter-connected scenes reflecting the depredations of siege warfare and the breakdown of normal social control mechanisms (2 Kgs 6:24–7:20). Each scene plays upon the tendency by humans whenever possible to calculate the risks that they face. Presented in these three episodes is a simple proposition: given current conditions, what actions are worth the risk? To make this clear the storyteller shapes the drama in order to highlight the choices that are made by the unnamed king and two widows as they attempt to deal with an emergency situation. The choices made by these characters include whether to take a risk and handle the crisis in their own way or to be risk-averse and rely upon the covenantal injunction to trust Yahweh to provide what is needed.
Arnoldi,Jakob. 2009. Risk: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
Bellaby,Paul. 1990. “To Risk or Not to Risk? Uses and Limitations of Mary Douglas on Risk Acceptability for Understanding Health and Safety at Work and Road Accidents.” Sociological Review38: 465–83.
3.
Bergen,Wesley J.1992. “The Prophetic Alternative: Elisha and the Israelite Monarchy.” Pp. 127–37 in Elijah and Elisha in Socioliterary Perspective, edited by CooteRobert. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
4.
Bernstein,P.L.1998. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
Bowles,Samuel, & GintisHerbert. 2002. “Social Capital and Community Governance.” The Economic Journal112: 419–36.
6.
Chapman,Honora. 2000. “‘A Myth for the World’: Early Christian Reception of Cannibalism in Josephus, Bellum Judaicum 6.199–219.” SBL Seminar Papers39: 359–78.
7.
Cogan,Mordechai. 2001. I Kings. AB 10; New York, NY: Doubleday.
8.
Cogan,Mordechai, & TadmorHayim. 1988. II Kings. AB 11; New York, NY: Doubleday.
9.
Craigie,Peter C.1976. The Book of Deuteronomy. NICOT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
10.
Crook,Zeba. 2009. “Honor, Shame, and Social Status Revisited.” JBL128: 591–611.
11.
Douglas,Mary. 1987. How Institutions Think. London, UK: Routledge.
12.
Durand,Jean-Marie. 2001. “Une alliance matrimoniale entre un marchand Assyrien de Kanesh et un marchand Mariote.” Pp. 119–32 in Veenhof Anniversary Volume: Studies Presented to Klaas R. Veenhof on the Occasion of his Sixty-fifth Birthday, edited by van SoldtW. H.. Leiden, the Netherlands: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
13.
Frame,Grant. 1999. “A Siege Document from Babylon Dating to 649 B.C.” JCS51: 101–06.
14.
Garsiel,Moshe. 2002. “Revealing and Concealing as a Narrative Strategy in Solomon's judgment (1 Kings 3:16–28).” CBQ64: 229–47.
15.
Greenfield,Jonas C.1991. “Doves' Dung and the Price of Food: The Topoi of 2 Kings 6:24–7:2.” Pp. 121–26 in Storia e Tradizioni Di Israele, edited by GarroneDaniele & IsraelFelice. Brescia, Italy: Paideia Editrice.
16.
Hens-Piazza,Gina. 2003. Nameless, Blameless, and Without Shame: Two Cannibal Mothers before a King. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
17.
Hobbs,T. R.1985. 2 Kings. WBC 13; Waco, TX: Word Books.
18.
Holloway,Charles A.1979. Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Models and Choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Janis,I. L., & MannL.. 1977. Decision Making: a Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
20.
King,Philip J., & StagerLawrence E.. 2001. Life in Biblical Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
21.
Knottnerus,J. D.2003. “The Need for Theory and the Value of Cooperation: Disruption and Deritualization,” Sociological Spectrum25: 5–19.
22.
LaBarbera,Robert. 1984. “The Man of War and the Man of God: Social Satire in 2 Kings 6:8–7:20.” CBQ46: 637–51.
23.
Lanner,Laurel. 1999. “Cannibal Mothers and Me: A Mother's Reading of 2 Kings 6.24–7.20.” JSOT85: 107–16.
24.
Lasine,Stuart. 1991. “Jehoram and the Cannibal Mothers (2 Kings 6:24–33): Solomon's Judgment in an Inverted World.” JSOT50: 27–53.
25.
Lasine,Stuart. 1989. “The Riddle of Solomon's Judgment and the Riddle of Human Nature in the Hebrew Bible.” JSOT45: 61–86.
26.
Long,Burke O.1991. 2 Kings. FOTL 10; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
27.
Mason,James D., & David KnotternusJ.. 2009. “The Application of Structural Ritualization Theory to Polar Expeditions.” Conference Papers: American Sociological Association, Annual Meeting: 1–24.
28.
Matthews,Victor H., & BenjaminDon C.. 1993. Social World of Ancient Israel, 1250–587 bce.Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
29.
Miller,Alan S., & HoffmanJohn P.. 1995. “Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity.” JSSR34: 63–75.
30.
Rendsburg,Gary A.1998. “The Guilty Party in 1 Kings iii:16–28.” VT48: 534–41.
31.
Sagoff,M.1985. “Sense and Sentiment in Occupational Safety and Health Programs.” Pp. 179–98 in The Language of Risk, edited by NelkinD.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Schulman,Alan R.1979. “Diplomatic Marriage in the Egyptian New Kingdom,” JNES58: 177–93.
33.
Shweder,Richard A.2003. “Toward a Deep Cultural Psychology of Shame.” Social Research70: 1109–30.
34.
Sweeney,Marvin A.2007. I & II Kings. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
35.
Taylor,Gabriele. 1985. Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
36.
Thornburg,P. Alex., David KnottnerusJ., & WebbGary. 2005. “Disaster and Deritualization: A Re-examination of Early Disaster Research,” Conference Papers: American Sociological Association, Annual Meeting. Philadelphia: 1–23.
37.
Vikman,Elisabeth. 2005. “Ancient Origins: Sexual Violence in Warfare, Part 1.” Anthropology & Medicine12: 21–31.
38.
Wilkinson,Iain. 2010. Risk, Vulnerability and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
Yates,J. Frank, & StoneEric R.. 1992. “The Risk Construct,” Pp. 3–23 in Risk—taking Behavior, edited by Frank YatesJ.. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
40.
Young,Peter C.2001. Managing Business Risk: an Organization-Wide Approach to Business Management. New York, NY: Amacom.
41.
Zinn,Jens O.2006. “Recent Developments in Sociology of Risk and Uncertainty.” Qualitative Social Research7: 1–8.
