Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: The presence of Carhart’s notch at 2000 Hz in otosclerosis links the changed bone conduction for this frequency with the otosclerotic process occurring in the oval window. The aim of this study is to perform an audiometric assessment of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of otosclerosis depending on the incidence of Carhart’s notch. Methods: The analysis included 116 patients treated surgically for the first time due to otosclerosis. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the occurrence of Carhart’s notch, determined by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) before the surgery and 36 months afterward. The mean value of bone conduction thresholds was calculated for 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 3000 Hz in the groups in which the Cahart’s notch was observed. This value of bone conduction (BC) was a reference point for further analysis in patients who had no preoperative or postoperative Carhart’s notch. Results: The analysis indicated that Cahart’s notch in preoperative PTA is a statistically significant improvement factor for average BC. It was found that over a longer observation period, the presence of Carhart’s notch has adverse effects on the size of the postoperative air-bone gap, and consequently on hearing improvement after surgical treatment. A comparison between patients from the two groups without preoperative Carhart’s notch found that no beneficial effects of the surgery on speech comprehension were observed regarding high-level sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Conclusions: (1) In a long-term observation post-stapedotomy, average BC values were found to improve. Nevertheless, the improvement is less evident in patients with preoperative Carhart’s notch. (2) Disappearance of Cahart’s notch after surgical treatment of otosclerosis is a good prognosis of improvement in speech audiometry. (3) Deep SNHL in the absence of Carhart’s notch in PTA constitutes a bad prognostic factor for improvement in speech audiometry in patients qualified for surgical treatment of otosclerosis.

Keywords

otosclerosis Carhart’s notch hearing improvement bone conduction speech audiometry

Introduction

Otosclerosis is a disease of the temporal bone, responsible for 5–9% of all hearing loss cases. The disease develops within the bony labyrinth. Impaired metabolism causes the initial softening of the osseous tissue, followed by secondary pathological sclerosis. The disease progression usually affects the anterior niche of the oval window (fissula ante fenestram). Consequently, the base of the stapes becomes fixed, impairing the transmission of sound waves from the middle ear through the chain of ossicles to the inner ear. Conductive hearing loss is usually observed during the initial phase of the disease. However, as the disease progresses, the sensorineural component becomes evident as well. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is also observed in cochlear otosclerosis when otosclerotic foci develop within the cochlea.¹

The basic tool for diagnosis and control of otosclerotic treatment is an audiometric examination. The pure-tone audiometry (PTA) graph presents an image specific to conductive hearing loss. A pure-tone audiometry shows the sensorinural hearing loss with respect to cochlear otosclerosis.^2,3

Under normal conditions, the basic route of conduction for an acoustic wave to the receptor is air. Bone conduction (BC), a component of normal hearing, is referred to as indirect conduction and constitutes a weaker acoustic stimulus compared to air conduction.

The bone conduction threshold in otosclerosis can be affected by the presence of otosclerotic foci in the osseous capsule of the cochlea and the related progressing impairment of the sensorineural apparatus, Carhart’s effect, which is associated with the fixed base of the stapes in the oval window, as well as by mechanical or acoustic trauma during a surgery.

Carhart’s notch as observed in pure-tone audiometry was described for the first time in 1950 by Raymond Carhart, and defined as a 10–20 dB increase in the bone conduction threshold for the frequency of 2000 Hz. Based on many years of observations, a similar-looking notch may occur in the frequency range of 500–3000 Hz in the course of other middle ear disorders that limit the motion of the chain of auditory ossicles. These disorders include secretory otitis media, tympanosclerosis, or auditory ossicle malformations. The notch observed for the frequency of 2000 Hz seems to occur as a result of increased impedance in the oval window. According to a theory by Stenfelt et al., the presence of Carhart’s notch at 2000 Hz in otosclerosis links the changed bone conduction for this frequency with the otosclerotic process occurring in the niche of the oval window.^4,5

In literature, the incidence of Carhart’s notch in patients with otosclerosis ranges from 31% to 80% of cases.⁶ The aim of the study is an audiometric assessment of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of otosclerosis depending on the preoperative incidence of Carhart’s notch.

Materials and methods

The analysis included 116 patients treated surgically for the first time due to otosclerosis between 2015 and 2018. Longitudinal retrospective interventional nonrandomized cohort study was performed. The patients were operated on at one site by surgeons with similar experience, using the same surgical technique. The patients who qualified for the study were 70 women aged 18 to 60 years and 46 men aged 27 to 57 years. The average age of the study participants was 40.87 years.

Criteria for inclusion in study: the first surgery due to otosclerosis, no congenital defects, no head injury in the patient’s history, and over 18 years old. Criteria for exclusion from the study: reoperation, congenital defects of the ear, head injury in the patient’s history, and under 18 years of age.

All patients gave their informed consent to the treatment and the participation in the study. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee.

Before surgical treatment and 36 months afterward, each patient underwent a medical interview, an otoscopic examination, and an audiological evaluation consisting of the whispered voice test, the tuning fork tests, pure-tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and impedance audiometry.

Stapedotomy was the chosen surgical technique to treat otosclerosis for 104 patients due to the progression of the disease, whereas stapedectomy was necessary in 12 cases.

The audiometric tests were carried out in the soundproof and sound-absorbing cabin of the audiometric laboratory. Data obtained in the audiometric examination were prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.⁷

Polish speech testing was carried out using testing material which comprised of 10 balanced lists, each consisting of 24 one-syllable nouns. The test was balanced acoustically, grammatically, phonematically, semantically, energetically, and structurally.

Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the occurrence of Carhart’s notch in the operated ear, which was determined by pure-tone audiometry before the surgery and 36 months afterward (Table 1).

Table 1.

Division of patients included to the study based on presence and absence of the Carhart’s notch in the established groups.

Group	Carhart’s notch		No	Patients' %
Group	Before surgery	After surgery	No	Patients' %
1	present	absent	25	21,6
2a (average BC<30.65 dB)	absent	absent	35	30,2
2b (average BC>30.65 dB)	absent	absent	37	31,9
3	absent	present	8	6,9
4	present	present	11	9,5

(BC - bone conduction).

Group 1 – Carhart’s notch present before surgery and absent after surgical treatment.

Group 2 – lack of the Carhart’s notch before and after surgical treatment (average bone conduction for 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz).

2a – group with average BC < 30.65 dB.

2b – group with average BC > 30.65 dB.

Group 3 – Carhart’s notch absent before surgery and present after surgical treatment.

Group 4 – Carhart’s notch present before and after surgical treatment.

Considering all the analyzed patients with preoperative Carhart’s notch presence, it was calculated that in these patients the mean value of bone conduction thresholds at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 3000 Hz was 30.65 dB.

Assessing the impact of the performed surgical treatment on the improvement of hearing in PTA and speech audiometry, this value of bone conduction thresholds was a reference point for further analysis in patients who had no preoperative or postoperative Carhart’s notch. On this basis, the division of patients from group 2 (in which no Carhart’s notch was found both before and after surgery) was made into two subgroups with average bone conduction < 30.65 dB and with average bone conduction > 30.65 dB.

The groups are divided as follows:

Group 1 (N = 25 patients) – Carhart’s notch present preoperatively and absent postoperatively.

Group 2 (N = 72 patients) – Carhart’s notch absent pre- and postoperatively.

2a (N = 35 patients) – Group with average BC < 30.65 dB.

2b (N = 37 patients) – Group with average BC > 30.65 dB.

Group 3(N = 8 patients) – Carhart’s notch absent preoperatively and present postoperatively.

Group 4(N = 11 patients) – Carhart’s notch present pre- and postoperatively.

The audiometric test results obtained in the relevant time interval were subject to analysis. Changes in the average air-bone gap (ABG); changes in the bone conduction values for the frequencies 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 3000 Hz; and changes in speech comprehension after surgical treatment were determined.

Preoperative results and results obtained at 36 months post-surgery were subject to a statistical analysis. The result analysis was carried out using the STATISTICA 13 suite (StatSoft Polska, Kraków, Poland). Chi-squared test, Pearson’s linear correlation, Student’s t-test, and one-way analysis of variance with small group adjustments were used. Statistically significant results of the variance analysis were examined post hoc using Tukey’s test. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.

Results

A statistically significant result was obtained in the variance analysis of the groups regarding the average preoperative values of bone conduction, (P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between groups with preoperative Carhart’s notch (group 1 and group 4) and groups without Carhart’s notch (group 2a, group 2b, and group 3) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Variances’ analysis of average bone conduction thresholds before surgical treatment in the established groups.

Group	n	BC preop
Group	n	average		SD	Me	Min		Max
Group 1	25	30,7		9,7	31,3	15,0		51,3	P < 0,001
Group 3	8	29,1		10,0	31,9	11,3		40,0
Group 4	11	35,2		9,0	36,4	20,0		43,8
Group 2b	37	39,1		4,9	38,8	31,3		48,8
Group 2a	35	22,7		4,4	23,8	12,5		30,0
	Group 1		Group 3		Group 4		Group 2b		Group 2a
Group 1	—		0,980		0,362		<0,001		<0,001
Group 3	0,980		—		0,314		0,003		0,137
Group 4	0,362		0,314		—		0,491		<0,001
Group 2b	<0,001		0,003		0,491		—		<0,001
Group 2a	<0,001		0,137		<0,001		<0,001		—

(BC pre-op, bone conduction thresholds before surgery, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum) statistically significant results in red.

The analysis of variance of the average postoperative values of bone conduction found a statistically significant difference between groups 2a and 2b (without Carhart’s notch). In terms of the average postoperative bone conduction threshold, these were two extreme groups. In group 2a, the BC was 22.1 dB, the lowest value among the compared groups, and amounted to 33.8 dB in group 2b, the highest among the compared groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the remaining groups (Table 3).

Table 3.

Variances' analysis of average bone conduction thresholds after surgical treatment in the established groups.

Group	n	BC postop
Group	n	average	SD		Me		Min		Max
Group 1	25	28,6	11,0		25,0		10,0		53,8	P < 0,001
Group 3	8	24,8	11,5		25,0		10,0		46,3
Group 4	11	26,8	11,4		27,5		11,3		46,3
Group 2b	37	33,8	11,1		32,5		16,3		63,8
Group 2a	35	22,1	7,8		21,3		10,0		37,5
	Group 1			Group 3		Group 4		Group 2b		Group 2a
Group 1	—			0,899		0,990		0,285		0,118
Group 3	0,899			—		0,994		0,173		0,958
Group 4	0,990			0,994		—		0,281		0,666
Group 2b	0,285			0,173		0,281		—		<0,001
Group 2a	0,118			0,958		0,666		<0,001		—

(BC postop, bone conduction thresholds after surgery, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum) statistically significant results in red.

The analysis of variance of the average preoperative ABG in the operated ear depending on the presence of Carhart’s notch showed no statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.187) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Variances’ analysis of average air-bone gap before surgical treatment in the established groups.

Group	n	ABG preop
Group	n	Average	SD	Me	Min	Max
Group 1	25	31,5	9,9	31,3	17,5	51,3	P = 0,187
Group 3	8	38,1	16,7	32,9	22,5	67,5
Group 4	11	28,2	7,7	26,3	18,8	45,0
Group 2b	37	29,5	8,2	28,5	10,0	42,5
Group 2a	35	30,9	9,0	32,5	13,8	43,8

(ABG preop, air-bone gap measured before surgery, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum).

A statistically significant result was obtained among groups in the analysis of variance of the average postoperative ABG, (P < 0.003). There was a statistically significant difference between groups 1, 2a, 2b (without Carhart’s notch), and group 4 (with persistent Carhart’s notch). No statistically significant differences were found between the remaining groups (Table 5).

Table 5.

Variances' analysis of average air-bone gap after surgical treatment in the established groups.

Group	N	ABG postop
Group	N	Average		SD		Me		Min		Max
Group 1	25		11,3		7,8		11,3		2,5		36,3	P = 0,003
Group 3	8		17,7		19,0		10,6		5,0		61,3
Group 4	11		26,9		18,2		25,0		2,5		61,3
Group 2b	37		15,3		11,5		12,5		1,3		53,8
Group 2a	35		12,0		8,8		11,3		0,0		32,5
		Group 1		Group 3		Group 4		Group 2b		Group 2a
Group 1		—		0,654		0,003		0,656		0,999
Group 3		0,654		—		0,417		0,986		0,719
Group 4		0,003		0,417		—		0,033		0,003
Group 2b		0,656		0,986		0,033		—		0,732
Group 2a		0,999		0,719		0,003		0,732		—

(ABG postop, air-bone gap measured after surgery, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum) statistically significant results in red.

Based on the above data, by examining the groups’ average pre- and postoperative ABG in the operated ear, it was found that the presence of Carhart’s notch over a longer observation has adverse effects on the size of the postoperative ABG, and consequently on hearing improvement after surgical treatment.

At the next stage of the study, a statistical analysis was applied to the change of the ABG within the groups after treatment on the 2000 Hz frequency. The biggest ABG change was obtained in group 3 (−20.4 dB). The smallest, on the other hand, was observed in group 4 (−1.9 dB). The analysis indicated persistent Carhart’s notch as a negative prognosis of ABG closure (P < 0.001) (Table 6).

Table 6.

Change in air-bone gap before and after surgical treatment in the established groups on the 2000 Hz frequency.

Group	No. of patients	Δ ABG
Group	No. of patients	2000 Hz		SD	Me		Min		Max
Group 1	25	−20,2		12,4	−21,3		−46,3		16,3	P < 0,001
Group 3	8	−20,4		11,9	−20,6		−40,0		1,3
Group 4	11	−1,9		14,9	−3,7		−23,8		18,8
Group 2b	37	−14,5		11,9	−15,0		−38,8		20,0
Group 2a	35	−18,9		10,2	−18,8		−41,3		−2,5
	Group 1		Group 3	Group 4		Group 2b		Group 2a
Group 1	—		1,000	<0,001		0,347		0,993
Group 3	1,000		—	0,009		0,705		0,997
Group 4	<0,001		0,009	—		0,020		0,001
Group 2b	0,347		0,705	0,020		—		0,528
Group 2a	0,993		0,997	0,001		0,528		—

(Δ ABG, change in air-bone gap, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum) statistically significant results in red.

The preoperative analysis of variance of sound pressure level (SPL) at which 100% speech comprehension was achieved showed a statistically significant difference between the examined groups (P < 0.032). This correlation occurred between groups 2a and 2b. Group 2b required an acoustic stimulus at a higher SPL compared to the remaining groups (Table 7).

Table 7.

Variances’ analysis of the sound pressure level necessary to achieve 100% speech understanding before surgery in the established groups.

100% Speech understanding before surgery			SPL (dB)
Group	N		Average		SD	Me	Min	Max
Group 1	25		73,3		8,3	70,0	65,0	85,0		P = 0,032
Group 3	8		70,0		5,0	70,0	65,0	75,0
Group 4	11		70,0		12,7	70,0	55,0	85,0
Group 2b	37		78,2		6,9	80,0	65,0	88,0
Group 2a	35		70,2		8,8	70,0	45,0	85,0
		Group 1		Group 3		Group 4	Group 2b		Group 2a
Group 1		—		0,944		0,944	0,524		0,814
Group 3		0,944		—		1,000	0,307		1,000
Group 4		0,944		1,000		—	0,307		1,000
Group 2b		0,524		0,307		0,307	—		0,020
Group 2a		0,814		1,000		1,000	0,020		—

(SPL, sound pressure level, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum) statistically significant results in red.

After the surgical treatment, the SPL needed for speech comprehension was reduced in all groups. The postoperative analysis of SPL variance at which 100% speech comprehension was achieved showed no statistically significant difference between the examined groups (Table 8).

Table 8.

Variances’ analysis of the sound pressure level necessary to achieve 100% speech understanding after surgery in the established groups.

100% Speech understanding before surgery		SPL (dB)
Group	n	Average	SD	Me	Min	Max
Group 1	25	59,2	13,8	57,5	45,0	85,0	P = 0,382
Group 3	8	57,0	16,0	55,0	35,0	75,0
Group 4	11	67,0	9,7	70,0	55,0	80,0
Group 2b	37	61,9	14,1	60,0	45,0	85,0
Group 2a	35	58,7	12,3	55,0	40,0	85,0

(SPL, sound pressure level, SD, standard deviation, Me, median, Min, minimum, Max, maximum).

Discussion

Improved hearing is one of the main goals of the surgical treatment of otosclerosis. It is considered from the perspective of closing the air-bone gap and improving bone conduction and speech comprehension.

Numerous publications discuss the influence of Carhart’s notch observed preoperatively on hearing improvement prognoses. Lamblin et al.⁶ indicate that this notch, observed in preoperative pure-tone audiometry is an unfavorable factor when it comes to bone conduction improvement prognoses. Sabbe et al.⁸ emphasize that the best bone conduction improvement after stapedotomy is observed at the resonance frequency of the chain of auditory ossicles (2000 Hz). As a result of the above correlation, a statistically significant change is observed in bone conduction in the group with Cahart’s notch, compared to patients without Cahart’s notch in pure-tone audiometry before surgical treatment. The analysis indicated Cahart’s notch in preoperative pure-tone audiometry as a statistically significant improvement factor for average bone conduction. In the analysis of the value of bone conduction assessed postoperatively, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups with preoperative Carhart’s notch (group 1 and group 4) and groups without Carhart’s notch (group 2 and group 3). The above data indicate that over a longer perspective (such as the 3 years of observation as a part of this study), a statistically significant improvement of bone conduction occurred in patients without postoperative Carhart’s notch.

The effects of middle ear surgery on the function of the inner ear and speech comprehension improvement have been discussed for a long time.^9,10 Surgical treatment improves patients’ quality of life and speech audiometry results. A finding discovered in this study is that speech comprehension improves in patients with preoperative Carhart’s notch and that the same does not happen in the case of persistent Carhart’s notch after surgical treatment. The most important component when it comes to speech comprehension is improved bone conduction up to 3000 Hz; higher frequencies contribute to sound quality.^11
-13

A comparison between patients from the two groups without preoperative Carhart’s notch found that when it comes to high-level sensorineural hearing loss (according to the criteria used for the analyzed group–above 30.65 dB), no beneficial effects of the surgery on speech comprehension were observed. Deep sensorineural hearing loss (group 2b) observed before surgical treatment in patients without Carhart’s notch led to worse speech comprehension compared to the group with better inner ear function but without Carhart’s notch.

A statistically significant improvement in speech comprehension was observed in the cases of lower-level sensorineural hearing loss without Carhart’s notch determined by preoperative PTA, as well as in patients with preoperative Carhart’s notch determined by PTA that disappeared after surgical treatment.

The analysis of the effects of Carhart’s notch on maintaining the air-bone gap after a surgery as part of the 36-month observation in the groups found that the presence of Carhart’s notch has adverse effects on the size of postoperative air-bone gap, and consequently the postoperative hearing improvement as well.

Persistent Carhart’s notch turned out to be a bad prognostic factor for closing the air-bone gap after surgical treatment in patients with otosclerosis (P < 0.001). The above correlation is consistent with the findings of other authors.^14

-17

No hearing improvement in postoperative patients with otosclerosis accounts for approximately 10% of all cases in literature. In this study, group 4, which had the worst result for air-bone gap closure and required an auditory stimulus of the highest intensity to achieve 100% in speech audiometry, accounted for 9.48% of all the study subjects. This result is consistent with the data available in the literature. Persistent Carhart’s notch, which was maintained for 36 months after the surgery, therefore had adverse effects on the air-bone gap change (P < 0.001), and consequently on postoperative hearing improvement.

The air-bone gap getting reduced below 20 dB in the subjects of the study is consistent with the findings of other authors (Szymański 2002 – more than 90% achieved air-bone gap reduction to below 20 dB; Sommers 1994 – air-bone gap was reduced below 20 dB in 94% of the patients).^2,3 In this study, an equivalent result was obtained in 90.5% of the subjects.

Conclusions

In a long-term observation post-stapedotomy, average bone conduction values improve. Nevertheless, the improvement is less evident in patients with preoperative Carhart’s notch.

The disappearance of Cahart’s notch after surgical treatment of otosclerosis is a good prognosis for improvement in speech audiometry.

Deep sensorineural hearing loss in the absence of Carhart’s notch in PTA constitutes a bad prognostic factor for improvement in speech audiometry in patients qualified for surgical treatment of otosclerosis.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Financial disclosure

This research was supported by statutory funds of the Department of Otolaryngology of the Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

ORCID iDs

Agnieszka Wiatr

Maciej Wiatr

References

Potocka

Mionskowski

Kuczkowski

. Etiopatogeneza otosklerozy. Forum Med Rodz. 2010;4(4):281-286.

Szymański

Gołąbek

. Otoskleroza. Diagnostyka i postępowanie. Magazyn Otolaryngologiczny. 2004;5:24-34.

García-Iza

Navarro

Goiburu

Pérez

Altuna

. Study of the improvement in bone conduction threshold after stapedectomy. Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition). 2016;67(5):268-274.

Dauman

. Bone conduction: an explanation for this phenomenon comprising complex mechanisms. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Dis. 2013;130(4):209-213.

Stenfelt

. Inner ear contribution to bone conduction hearing in the human. Hear Res. 2015;329:41-51.

Lamblin

Karkas

Jund

Schmerber

. Is the Carhart notch a predictive factor of hearing results after stapedectomy?. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021;41(1):84-90.

American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery . Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. AmericanAcademy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Ffoundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:186-187.

Sabbe

Verhaert

Joossen

Lammens

Debruyne

. Otosclerosis: Shift in bone conduction after stapedotomy. B-ENT. 2015;11(3):183-189.

Wiatr

. Influence of changes in bone-conduction thresholds on speech audiometry in patients who underwent surgery for otosclerosis. J Int Adv Otol. 2020;16(3):353-357.

10.

Konopka

Zalewski

Olszewski

. [Speech understanding in patients after stapedectomy (early results)]. Otolaryngologia Polska. 2000;54:161-166.

11.

Bocca

Calearo

. Central hearing processes. In: J

Jerger

, ed. Modern Developments in Audiology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1963.

12.

Moore

BCJ

Stone

Füllgrabe

Glasberg

Puria

. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2008;29:907-922.

13.

Tan

C-T

Moore

BCJ

. Perception of nonlinear distortion by hearing-impaired people. Int J Audiol. 2008;47:246-256.

14.

Yasan

. Predictive role of Carhart’s notch in pre-operative assessment for middle-ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:219-221.

15.

Wegner

Bittermann

AJN

Hentschel

van der Heijden

GJM

Grolman

. Pure-tone Audiometry in Otosclerosis. Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(4):528-532.

16.

Wiatr

. Unfavourable prognostic factors in patients treated surgically for otosclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(7):533-536.

17.

Wiatr

Składzień

Strek

Wiatr

. Carhart Notch-A Prognostic Factor in Surgery for Otosclerosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(4):193-197.

The Audiometric Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Otosclerosis Depending on the Preoperative Incidence of Carhart’s Notch

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Financial disclosure

ORCID iDs

References