One's ability to function visually is determined by many factors. A theoretical model is proposed that organizes these factors into a pliable three-dimensional structure composed of visual abilities, available resources and past experiences, and environmental cues. Professionals can use the model to postulate how to elicit visual behaviors or to maximize visual function in individuals with low vision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarragaN.Visual handicaps and learning: A developmental approach.Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1976.
2.
BarragaN.Teachers’ guide for development of visual learning abilities and utilization of low vision.Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1971.
3.
BarragaN., and CollinsM.Development of efficiency in visual functioning: Rationale for a comprehensive program.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1979, 73, 121–126.
4.
BeliveauM., and SmithA.Training for visual efficiency without optical aids. In Beliveau, & Smith (Eds.), The interdisciplinary approach to low vision rehabilitation (pp. 224-258).(Grant No. 45-P-81535/2-01). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Services Administration, Division of Manpower Development, 1980.
5.
BishopV.Teaching the visually limited child.Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1971.
6.
BronsonG.The postnatal growth of visual capacity.Child Development, 1974, 45, 873–890.
7.
CornA.Development and assessment of an in-service training program for teachers of the visually handicapped: Optical aids in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia UniversityNew York, N. Y., 1980.
FreudenbergerH., and RobinsI.Characteristics of acceptance and rejection of optical aids in a low vision population.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1959, 47, 584–586.
10.
GeruschatD.Functional implications of common pathologies of the eye. In BeliveauM., SmithA. (Eds.), The interdisciplinary approach to low vision rehabilitation (pp. 54-81). (Grant No. 45-P-81535/2-01). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Services Administration, Division of Manpower Development, 1980.
11.
GuilfordJ. P.The nature of human intelligence.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
12.
JastrzembskaZ.The effects of blindness and other impairments on early development.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1976.
13.
JoseR., SmithA., and ShaneK.Evaluating and stimulating vision in the multiply impaired.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1980, 74, 2–8.
14.
LeismanG.Basic visual processes and learning disability.Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1976.
15.
MeekerM.The structure of intellect: Its interpretation and uses.Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1969.
16.
MorseJ.Psycho-social aspects of low vision: Considerations and inventions. In BeliveauM., SmithA. (Eds.), The interdisciplinary approach to low vision rehabilitation (pp. 430-455). (Grant No. 45-P-81535/2-01). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Services Administration, Division of Manpower Development, 1980.
17.
ParsonsS.An exploratory study on the patterns of emerging play behavior in young children with low vision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of TexasAustin, Tex., 1982.
18.
SicurellaV.Color contrast as an aid for visually impaired persons.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1977, 71, 252–257.
19.
ThomR.Structural stability and morphogenesis.Reading, Mass.: W. A. Benjamin, 1975.
20.
VaughnD., and AsburyT.General ophthalmology.Los Altos, Calif.: Lange Medical Publications, 1977.
