Describes the unique aspects of mobility training and the effects they have on travel in particular and rehabilitation in general. Discusses future options for the profession, and need to expand populations served.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonT. P.An alternative frame of reference for rehabilitation: The helping process versus the McDick model. In MarinelliR., and Pell OrtoA. (Eds.) The psychological and social impact of physical disability.New York: Springer Publishing Co., 1977.
2.
BanduraA., and WaltersR. H.Social learning and personality development.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1963.
3.
BledsoeC. W.Originators of orientation and mobility training. In WelshR., BlaschB. (Eds.) Foundations of orientation and mobility.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1980.
4.
CarkhuffR.Helping and human relations.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1969.
5.
CarrollT. J.Blindness: What it is, what it does, and how to live with it.Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1961.
6.
HavensL. L.Dependence: Definitions and strategies.Rehabilitation Record, 1967, 8(2), 23–28.
WardellK.Environmental modifications. In WelshR., BlaschB. (Eds.) Foundations of orientation and mobility.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1980.
