The assessment of behavior patterns and levels of functioning of visually handicapped students is essential for establishing effective educational programs. This article discusses the factors in formative assessment, the types of data to be collected, and the most appropriate measurement instruments that are available to evaluate a variety of skills which are necessary for learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarragaN.Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
2.
BrownD., SimmonsV., and MethninJ.Oregon project for visually impaired and blind preschool children.Medford, Ore.: Jackson County Education Service District, 1978.
CollinsM., and RudolphJ.A manual for the assessment of a deaf-blind multiply-handicapped child. Midwest Regional Center for Services to Deaf Blind Children, 1975.
5.
EfronM., and DuBoffB.A vision guide for teachers of deaf-blind children.Raleigh, N.C.: State Department of Public Instruction, 1975.
6.
FieberN.Cognitive skills. In HaringN. (Ed.) Developing effective individualized education programs.Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, Office of Education, 1977, 212–252.
7.
FolioR., and DuBoseR.Peabody developmental motor scales. Behavioral Science Monograph No. 25. Nashville, Tenn.: Institute on Mental Retardation and Intellectual Development, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1974.
8.
FraibergS.I., SiegelB., and GibsonR.The role of sound in the search behavior of blind infants.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1966, 327–357.
9.
GruberK., and LeslieM.Cumulative record of visual functioning of children and youth with severe visual impairment.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964.
10.
HaringN. (Ed.) Developing effective individualized education programs for severely handicapped children and youth.Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, Office of Education, 1977.
11.
Key math diagnostic arithmetic test.Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1976.
12.
LangleyB.Gestural approach to thought and expression (GATE).Nashville, Tenn.: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1980.
13.
MolloyJ.Trainable children.New York: John Day Co., 1972.
14.
MullenPsychological S/R evaluation for severely multiply handicapped children.East Providence, R.I.: Meeting Street School, 1977.
15.
Project Vision-Up curriculum.Boise, Idaho: Educational Products & Training Foundation,
16.
Santa Cruz Schools.Behavioral characteristics progression.Palo Alto, Calif.: Vort Corp., 1973.
SilbermanR., and TripodiV.Adaptation of Project “I CAN” primary skills physical education program for deaf-blind children.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1979, 73(7), 270–276.
19.
SomertonE., and TurnerK.The Pennsylvania training model individual assessment guide.Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children, 1975.
20.
StephensB.Training manual for teachers of the visually handicapped: A Piagetian perspective.Richardson: University of Texas at Dallas, 1977.
21.
StillmanR.Callier-Azusa scale.Dallas, Tex.: Callier Center for Communication Disorders, 1978.
22.
SwallowR., MangoldS., and MangoldP.AFB practice report: Informal assessment of developmental skills for visually handicapped students.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1978.
23.
UzgirisI., and HuntJ.Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development.Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1975.
24.
WesselJ. A.I Can implementation guide.Northbrook, Ill.: Hubbard Scientific Co., 1976.
25.
WilliamsW., and FoxT.Minimal objectives system for pupils with severe handicaps.Burlington: Center for Special Education, University of Vermont, 1977.
26.
WilliamsW.Teaching social skills. In SnellM. (Ed.) Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped.Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1978, 281–300.
