AmendolaR.: Practical considerations in tactile map design. Unpublished manuscript. 1973.
2.
AngwinJ.P.B.: Maps for mobility. 1.New Beacon, 1968, 52, 115–119.
3.
AngwinJ.P.B.: Maps for mobility. 2.New Beacon, 1968, 52, 143–145.
4.
ArmstrongJ.D. ed.: The design and production of maps for the visually handicapped, Mobility Monograph No. 1, Blind Mobility Research Unit, Dept. of Psychology, University of NottinghamNottingham, England, 1973.
5.
BentzenB.L.: Production and testing of an orientation and travel map for visually handicapped persons.New Outlook for the Blind, 1972, 66, 249–255.
6.
BentzenB.L.: Orientation maps for visually impaired persons.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1977, 71, 193–196.
7.
BerlaE.P.: Strategies in scanning a tactual pseudomap.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1973, 5, 8–19.
8.
BerlaE.P., ButterfieldL.H., & MurrM.J.: Tactile reading of political maps by blind students: A videomatic behavioral analysis. In press.
9.
BlaschB.B., WalshR.L., & DavidsonT.: Auditory maps: An orientation aid for visually handicapped persons.New Outlook for the Blind, 1973, 67, 145–158.
10.
BorishI.M.: Clinical Refraction.Chicago, Professional Press, 1949.
11.
ChangE., & JohnsonD.E.: Tactual maps with interchangeable parts.New Outlook for the Blind, 1968, 62, 122–124.
12.
CravenR.W.: The use of aluminum sheets in producing tactual maps for blind persons.New Outlook for the Blind, 1972, 66, 323–330.
13.
FluhartyW., McHughJ., McHughM., WilletsP., & WoodJ.: Anxiety in the teacher-student relationship as applicable to orientation and mobility instruction.New Outlook for the Blind, 1976, 70, 153–156.
14.
FoulkeE.: Transfer of a complex perceptual skill.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 18, 733–740.
15.
GillJ.M.: Design, production and evaluation of tactual maps for the blind. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of WarwickCoventry, England, 1973 (a).
16.
GillJ.M.: Method for the production of tactual maps and diagrams.AFB Research Bulletin, No. 26, June 1973, 203–204 (b).
GillJ.M., & JamesG.A.: A study on the discrimination of tactual point symbols, AFB Research Bulletin, No. 26, June 1973, 19–34.
19.
GilsonC., WurzburgerB., & JohnsonD.E.: The use of the raised map in teaching mobility to blind children.New Outlook for the Blind, 1965, 59, 59–62.
20.
GreenbergG.L.: Map design for partially seeing students: An investigation of white versus black line symbology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of WashingtonSeattle, Washington, 1968.
21.
GreenbergG.L., & ShermanJ.C.: Design of maps for partially seeing children, International Yearbook of Cartography, 10, 1970, 111–115.
22.
HeathW.R.: Maps and graphics for the blind: Some aspects of the discriminability of textural surfaces for use in areal differentiation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington. University MicrofilmsAnn Arbor, Mich.1958, No. 69-829.
23.
HillJ.W.: Limited field of view in reading lettershapes with the fingers. In GeldardF. (ed.) Cutaneous communication systems and devices.Psychonomic Society, 1973.
24.
JamesG.A.: Problems in the standardization of design and symbolization in tactile route maps for the blind.New Beacon, 1972, 56, 87–91.
25.
JamesG.A.: Kit for making raised maps.New Beacon, 1975, 59, 85–90.
26.
JamesG.A., & ArmstrongJ.D.: An evaluation of a shopping centre map for the visually handicapped, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1975, 48, 125–128.
27.
JamesG.A., & GillJ.M.: Mobility maps for the visually handicapped: Study of learning and retention of raised symbols.AFB Research Bulletin, No. 27, 1974, 87–98.
28.
JamesG.A., & GillJ.M.: Pilot study of the discriminability of tactile areal and line symbols for the blind.AFB Research Bulletin, No. 29, 1975, 23–31.
29.
JanssonG.: Symbols for tactile maps. In LindqvistB., & TrowaldN. (eds.) European Conference of Educational Research for the Visually Handicapped.Project PUSS. VIII. Report No. 31, 1972, 66–73.
30.
KidwellA.M., & GreerP.S.: The environmental perceptions of blind persons and their haptic representation.New Outlook for the Blind, 1972, 66, 256–276.
31.
KidwellA.M., & GreerP.S.: Sites, perception and the nonvisual experience: Designing and manufacturing mobility maps.N.Y.: American Foundation for the Blind, 1973.
32.
LappinJ.S., & FoulkeE.: Expanding the tactual field of view.Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 237–241.
33.
LeonardJ.A.: Aids to navigation; a discussion of the problem of maps for the blind traveller. Paper presented at the St. Dunstan's International Conference on Sensory Devices for the Blind, London, 1966. (a)
LeonardJ.A., & NewmanR.C.: Three types of “maps” for blind travel.Ergonomics, 1970, 13, 165–179.
36.
LeviJ.M., & SchiffW.: Study of texture discrimination. Appendix B. of Development of raised line drawings as supplementary tools in the education of the blind. Final report, September, 1966, Project No. RD-1571-S, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vocational Rehabilitation Administration.
37.
MaglioneF.D.: An experimental study of the use of tactual maps as orientation and mobility aids for adult blind subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois1969.
38.
MorrisJ.E.: Discriminability of tactual patterns. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Louisville1961.
39.
MorrisJ.E., & NolanC.Y.: Minimum sizes for areal type tactual symbols.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1963, 13, 48–51.
NolanC.Y.: A study of pictures for large type textbooks.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1960, 9, 67–70.
42.
NolanC.Y.: Teacher preference for types of illustrations in large type text books.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1961, 10, 112–114.
43.
NolanC.Y.: Illustrations and educational devices for the blind.Proceedings of the American Association of Instructors of the Blind, 1964, 47, 54–68.
44.
NolanC.Y.: Relative legibility of raised and incised tactual figures.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1971, 3, 33–36.
45.
NolanC.Y., & MorrisJ.E.: Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children. Final report, 1971. Project No. 5-0421; Grant No. OEG-32-27-0000-1012, Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind.
46.
SchiffW.: Manual for the construction of raised line diagrams. Appendix JJ of Development of raised line drawings as supplementary tools in the education of the blind. Final report. September, 1966, Project No. RD-1571-S, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vocational Rehabilitation Administration.
47.
SchiffW: Research on raised line drawings.New Outlook for the Blind.1965, 59, 134–137.
48.
SchiffW., & IsikowH.: Stimulus redundancy in the tactile perception of histograms. Appendix C. of Development of raised line drawings as supplementary tools in the education of the blind. Final report, September 1966, Project No. RD-1571-S, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vocational Rehabilitation Administration.
49.
SchiffW., & LeviJ.: Development of raised line drawings as supplementary tools in the education of the blind. Final report, September, 1966. Project No. RD-1571-S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vocational Rehabilitation Administration.
50.
ShawA.: Print for Partial Sight.London: The Library Association, 1969.
51.
ShepherdO.: Map work with blind students. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Council of Educators of Blind Youth, Watertown, MA. August, 1967.
52.
ShermanJ.C.: Needs and resources in maps for the blind.New Outlook for the Blind, 1965, 59, 130–134.
53.
WiedelJ.W., & GrovesP.A.: Designing and reproducing tactual maps for the visually handicapped.New Outlook for the Blind, 1969, 63, 196–201. (a)
54.
WiedelJ.W., & GrovesP.A.: Tactual mapping: Design, reproduction, reading and interpretation. Final report, 1969, University of Maryland, Project No. DR-2557-S, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vocational Rehabilitation Administration, (b)