Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction: Visual experience has a substantial effect on how individuals construct a template of their own bodies in space. Whether the absence of total or partial visual exposure in individuals of both genders allows the buffering of harmful effects has yet to be tested. This study examined the role of vision among congenitally blind and later blind subjects for the expression of body esteem and sociocultural attitudes toward appearance. Methods: Participants comprised 101 subjects, 53 sighted and 48 visually impaired men and women. For the purpose of the study, we took into consideration congenitally blind, late blind, and typically sighted individuals. The Sociocultural Attitudes toward Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) and the Body-Esteem Scale Questionnaire (BESQ) were used as measures. Results: Although congenitally blind, late blind, and typically sighted individuals showed similar awareness of media content and beauty ideals, typically sighted women displayed higher pressure to conform and had higher levels of social comparison. Congenitally blind women placed less emphasis on mass media as an influential aspect of their body perception and showed reduced internalization of beauty ideals and higher levels of body esteem. Moreover, men with visual impairments considered siblings and family to be the most influential information sources for their own body perception, while showing reduced levels of athlete internalization. Discussion: In this research, it was identified that the absence of sight influences an individual's body image beyond its physical, metric representation. Susceptibility to detrimental messages linked to sociocultural standards of attractiveness is interiorized by individuals with and without visual impairments, regardless of their gender. Implications for Practitioners: Further studies on body esteem and sociocultural pressures could enable practitioners to better understand how to support individuals with visual impairments in coping with an unhealthy social environment and with feelings of unhappiness related to their appearance.

Keywords

blindness body satisfaction body image internal representation visual impairment visual feedback somatosensory input

Being able to see provides individuals with the ability to visually perceive the size and features of their bodies and to read cues indicative of body shapes, proportions, and physical appearance (Azañón et al., 2018; Longo & Haggard, 2012; Pasqualotto & Proulx, 2012; Peelen & Downing, 2007). More specifically, body image denotes a person's internal body representation, encompassing their perception, knowledge, and evaluation of it, whereas an ideal body image relates to a desirable body template (e.g., the one presented in media or social circles). These two concepts are fundamentally different: one describes an actual perception of the body, whereas the latter portrays an imaginative template (Heider et al., 2015). To gain acceptance, people compare their looks to the societally enforced standards, reinforcing an ideal body model (Aparicio-Martinez et al., 2019; Grabe et al., 2008; Hoyt & Kogan, 2001; Phillips & de Man, 2010; Wolf, 1991).

The perception of an ideal body image might be endorsed differently by the visually impaired (i.e., those who are blind or have low vision) versus sighted individuals. Yet, being visually impaired does not preclude the development of an ideal body image, since mainstream ideals may bypass vision and affect a person through other sensory modalities (Kaplan-Myrth, 2000; Nava et al., 2021), such as tactile, proprioceptive, auditory information, and from comments made by family and friends (Pazzaglia & Zantedeschi, 2016). Similarly, a lack of visual input does not prevent individuals from being exposed to societal pressures.

A large proportion of influence originates from visual media (Birkeland et al., 2005; Fallon, 1990; Grogan & Richards, 2002; Lee & Lee, 2021; Mishkind et al., 1986; Nichter & Bordo, 1995; Wolf, 1991). Television, magazines, photography, and smartphone applications (apps) play a dominant role in how the “ideal body” is conveyed (Grabe et al., 2008; Lee & Lee, 2021). However, the degree to which visual depictions of ideals directly affect satisfaction and body esteem is not entirely clear. Previous research showed that congenitally blind women, who are unable to access visual images of body ideals, have higher body satisfaction than sighted women, implying that limited exposure to visual media may offer some protection from developing concerns around body image (Ashikali & Dittmar, 2012; Baker et al., 1998; Gebauer et al., 2019). Other findings suggest that women with congenital and adventitious blindness may be as prone to internalizing messages on sociocultural idealizations as sighted women (Page & Papps, 2018; Simeunovic Ostojic & Hansen, 2013), confirming that the negative effect of social comparison does not require visual input (Gaudio et al., 2014; Touyz et al., 1988) and may be enhanced through other psychosocial factors (Simeunovic Ostojic & Hansen, 2013). Hence, the notion that restricted access to visual beauty idealizations results in decreased internalization of unhealthy messages and consequently higher body satisfaction is undoubtedly in question.

Various representations of an ideal body may exist regardless of an individual's visual experience (Cicmil & Eli, 2014; Fernández-Aranda et al., 2006; Gaudio et al., 2014; Kocourkova et al., 2011; Nava et al., 2021; Touyz et al., 1988). However, what are the most prominent channels through which visually impaired individuals access potentially triggering messages? Studies investigating internalization and body esteem in men with visual impairments are lacking. There is no evidence on the extent to which previous visual experience suffices to shape a person's own body image in relation to idealized images (Nava et al., 2021). Further, there is a lack of evidence about whether previous visual experiences lead individuals to internalize idealized body images and promote low body esteem in women.

Women are thought to experience a greater desire than men to conform to beauty standards (Green & Pritchard, 2003; Grogan & Richards, 2002; Wolf, 1991). Studies describe body dissatisfaction among women as “normative,” contrasted with mixed findings in men (Betz et al., 1994; Grabe et al., 2008; Mishkind et al., 1986). The consensus is that women are more likely to be displeased with their bodies (Gebauer et al., 2019; Pinquart & Pfeiffer, 2012), since their looks are more frequently idealized and societal influences forge greater emphasis on their appearance (Bech-Sørensen & Pollet, 2016; Kenrick & Gutierres, 1980; Morgan, 1993; Scheller et al., 2021).

Most research points to the “thin ideal” as being the prominent trigger for the dissatisfaction women feel toward their bodies (Cusumano & Thompson, 1997; Homan, 2010; Knobloch-Westerwick, 2015; Lee & Lee, 2021; Presnell et al., 2004). More recently, women may also desire a more “muscular,” “toned,” and “athletic” physiques (Homan, 2010; Robinson et al., 2017; Tiggemann & Zaccardo, 2015). Additionally, the male body has become systematically more “visible” in media, leading to increased effects of muscularity-oriented body ideals on men's body satisfaction (Grogan & Richards, 2002; Karazsia & Crowther, 2009). Research demonstrates how sociocultural prejudices favor an athletic mesomorph body shape, and men who display this specific body type are generally described with more positive attributes such as strength, power, and happiness (Edwards & Launder, 2000; Grogan & Richards, 2002; Jacobi & Cash, 1994; Tovée et al., 1999). The attainment of these body ideals may negatively affect individuals’ mental health, triggering body-related conflicts, and eating disorders in both sexes (Cafri et al., 2005; Homan, 2010).

Women who are visually impaired also experience eating disorders (Simeunovic Ostojic & Hansen, 2013), displaying analogous significance of appearance, with the thin-ideal awareness and internalization in the expansion of eating disorders as their sighted counterparts (Fernández-Aranda et al., 2006; Simeunovic Ostojic & Hansen, 2013). Research has included reported triggers like premature exposure to a Barbie doll (Dittmar et al., 2006; Simeunovic Ostojic & Hansen, 2013) and auditory information about appearance stereotyping and discrimination (Lavin & Cash, 2001).

In this article, we explore the role of visual experience in shaping ideal body images, by researching how information gathered from the environment is internalized and affects body esteem. We recruited sighted women and men, as well as those with congenital and adventitious blindness, and assessed internalization and pressures to conform to body ideals that are popularized through mass media. We hypothesized that men place less emphasis on factors related to self-acceptance, internalization, and comparison of their body image, and that they display less concern on idealized body characteristics (Gebauer et al., 2019). Additionally, sighted individuals were expected to have lower body satisfaction as a result of increased contact to sociocultural pressures (mass media) compared to individuals with visual impairments.

Method

Participants

A total of 56 sighted and visually impaired women and 45 sighted and visually impaired men participated in this study (mean age 34.15 + 1.40 years; see Table 1). Participants with congenital and adventitious blindness were recruited from online forums dedicated to people with visual impairments, including those of the Royal National Institute for Blind People (RNIB), Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, and other nonprofit groups. Sighted participants were reached via email, Facebook, Twitter, and the university notice board. The survey was hosted on Bristol Online Surveys. Accessibility with screen readers was ascertained prior to the launch of the study. Ethical approval was gained from the University of Bath ethics committee (reference 14-049) and informed consent was obtained. All congenitally blind subjects reported that they had been completely blind since birth. Blindness onset in the adventitiously visually impaired group ranged between 2 and 50 years of age. Visual ability was based on self-report, as indicated by participants and multiple conditions that lead to low vision or total blindness were recorded (Table 2).

Table 1.
Number of Subjects and Total Per Group.

Gender Congenitally Blind Late Blind Typically Sighted Total

Female 17 10 29 56

Male 10 11 24 45

Total 27 21 53 101

Table 2.
Reported Medical Conditions Leading to Partial or Total Blindness.

Congenitally blind males Congenitally blind females Late bind males Late blind females

Retinopathy of prematurity (2)
Full optic nerve damage (1)
Underdeveloped optic nerve (1)
Fraser syndrome (1)
Congenital with light perception (1)
Leber's congenital amaurosis (1)
Cause not reported (3) Congenital cataracts (1)
Genetic mutation (1)
Detached retinas (1)
Leber's congenital amaurosis
Retinopathy of prematurity (3)
Septum optic dysplasia (1)
Anaridia and nystagmus (1)
Cause not reported (8) Retinitis Pigmentosa (2)
Infantile cataracts (1)
Retinal detachments (1)
Secondary onset glaucoma (1)
Cataracts (1)
Cause not reported (5) Congenital glaucoma (1)
Retinitis Pigmentosa (2)
Optic nerve atrophy (1)
Diabetic retinopathy (1)
Genetic degenerative eye disease (Stargardt) (1)
Traumatic brain injury (1)
Age related macular degeneration (AMD) (1)
Cause not reported (2)

SATAQ-3

To assess awareness, perceived pressure, and internalization to conform to ideals, participants completed the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3; Thompson et al., 2004). SATAQ-3 has four subscales: regarding mass media as an informational source (INFO, e.g., “Magazine advertisements are an important source of information about being attractive”); perceived burden to adapt to ideals conveyed by the media (PRESS, e.g., “I’ve felt pressure from TV to have a perfect body”); tendency to internalize body ideals as displayed by media (INT-GEN, e.g., “I wish I looked like the models in music videos”); and internalization to athletic body ideals (INT-ATH, e.g., “I try to look like sports athletes”). Further, to control whether blind and sighted participants differed in the extent of awareness regarding enforced societal appearance norms we included (AWAR, e.g., “People who are thin are better looking than people who are overweight”) and a subscale assessing social comparison tendencies (INT-COMP, e.g., “I compare my body to that of people in ‘good shape’”).

BESQ

The Body-Esteem Scale Questionnaire (BESQ; Franzoi & Shields, 1984) was used to explore body esteem and dissatisfaction. The survey included 17 items from the Body Cathexis Scale and 16 items rating different measures for men and women (Franzoi & Shields, 1984). Feelings related to each part or bodily function were measured using a scale ranging from Have strong negative feelings (1) to Have strong positive feelings (5). Three major scales were to be considered in this test; (1) physical attractiveness (PA) for males or sexual attractiveness (SA) for females, (2) upper body strength (UBS) for males or weight concern (WC) for females, and (3) physical condition (PC) for both males and females. Note that the number and items on each subscale differed for men and women, since not all items were relevant for each sex and we omitted the item “eyes appearance” to adapt the survey to our targeted population.

Data Analysis

Raw data were extracted and processed in R (version 4.0.3). Bartlett tests were conducted for male and female participants separately to ascertain homogeneity of variances across the different vision groups, suggesting variance homogeneity in all cases (p ≥ .10). The scales used appeared to be appropriate for the variables the research wanted to measure showing high reliability (α = .95) and positive face validity, r (98) = 0.5, p = .195. Shapiro–Wilk tests denoted that all SATAQ scores were not normally distributed, while all BESQ scores were normally distributed (p ≥ .133). Hence, SATAQ scores were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, while BESQ scores using a one-way ANOVA with type III sums of squares to account for unequal group sizes across the three vision groups. Level-based post hoc contrasts were led with Mann–Whitney U tests and independent samples t-tests, respectively.

Sociodemographic Survey

To investigate body image and the potential influencing role of external references, we created a questionnaire that combined direct and open responses exploring: “mass media,” “family,” “school,” “peers,” and “siblings” (see Table 3). Respondents were presented with three answers: “Yes,” “No,” and “I don’t know”; there was also an additional open-comment box. Degree of visual impairment was measured by asking the following questions:
Are you blind?

Were you born blind? and

At what age did you become totally blind?

Table 3.
Percentage of Reported Sources of Influence on Body Image for Each Sex and Vision Group.

Sex Sightedness Family Siblings Peers Mass-media School/work n

Female Blind 93 67 89 56 44 27

Sighted 76 38 90 90 86 29

Male Blind 81 48 76 57 38 21

Sighted 61 39 78 75 61 24

We added questions to measure body satisfaction (i.e., “I feel happy with the way they look,” “I compare myself to others,” and “I wish I could look different”) recording them from definitely disagree (1) to definitely agree (5). Presence of changes in eating patterns and influence on body perception were assessed with the question: “Which of these factors do you think have had an influence on your Eating Patterns/Body perception?” Participants answered by rating the items: “media, family, peers, siblings” and “school.” For the purpose of this part of the research, participants with adventitious and congenital blindness were grouped for analysis.

Results

Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance and Body Esteem

Males

In the male group, vision level had a significant effect on internalization of the athletic ideal: H (2) = 8.58, p = .013, η² = 0.16, with sighted males scoring significantly higher than congenitally blind (U = 54, p = .012) and late-blind males (U = 57, p = .039). This finding suggests that males may be more influenced by visually conveyed sociocultural ideals regarding how athletic they perceive their bodies to be (see Figure 1). There was no significant influence of vision status on any of the other SATAQ factors (p ≥ .172). (See Supplemental Table 3 for the full details and Supplemental Table 1 for group-specific descriptions.) Furthermore, vision status did not affect body esteem regarding upper body strength (p = .250) nor self-rated physical attractiveness (p = .701).

Figure 1.
Average Scores for Male and Female Participants, Split by Vision Status, On the SATAQ and BESQ measures. Error Bars Indicate the Standard Error of the Mean. AWAR = awareness of social appearance norms, INFO = recognizing mass media as an important source of beauty ideals, PRESS = perceived pressure to conform to beauty ideals, INT-GEN = internalization of a generic media influence (TV, magazines, and movies), INT-ATH = internalization of the athlete ideal, INT-COMP = tendency to engage in social comparison of perceived body appearance.

Females

Females exhibited statistically significant differences in the perceived pressure to conform with ideal body appearances conveyed through the media depending on vision level: H (2) = 8.993, p = .011, η² = 0.13. Follow-up contrasts revealed that congenitally blind and late-blind women reported lower pressure than sighted women (congenitally blind: U = 123.5, p = .011; late blind: U = 68.5, p = .023). Internalization through TV, magazines, and movies also showed significant difference between vision groups, H (2) = 11.144, p = .004, η² = 0.17; higher mean scores were found for sighted compared to congenitally blind (U = 85, p < .001), but not late-blind (p = .18). The same pattern was found for internalization of athletic ideals, H (2) = 7.108, p = .029, η² = 0.10; the main differences arose between sighted and congenitally blind women (U = 117.5, p = .006) but not sighted and late-blind (p = .559). Vision level also affected the extent to which women exhibited tendencies of social comparison, H (2) = 14.312, p < .001, η² = 0.23; sighted women scored significantly higher than both congenitally blind (U = 81.5, p < .001) and late-blind (U = 72.5, p = .041), as seen in Figure 1. In contrast, awareness of media-enforced societal appearance norms did not differ between vision groups: H (2) = 1.348, p = .51, η² = 0.01.

Regarding body esteem, vision level significantly modulated women's self-rated sexual attractiveness, F (2, 52) = 3.627, p = .034, η² = 0.12; but not weight concern, F (2, 52) = 0.555, p = .265, η² = 0.02. Follow-up contrasts indicated that sexual attractiveness was rated significantly higher in the congenitally blind in comparison to sighted women, t (30) = 2.445, p = .021; while late-blind and sighted women did not differ: t (21) = 0.476, p = .639.

Sociodemographic Survey

To assess whether sighted and blind individuals relied on different sources of information on body image, the relationship between visual experiences and information sources was assessed via a Chi-squared test of independence for both female and male groups separately. As seen in Table 3, a significant relationship between visual experience information sources was evident in the female group, showing that sighted females predominantly relied on information conveyed through mass media, X² (4, N = 56) = 19, p < .01; and school or work, X² (4, N = 56) = 15.23, p < . 01.

Although fewer blind females used mass media to gain information about beauty ideals, they were nevertheless affected by societally enforced ideal body standards, as conveyed through mass media. One congenitally blind woman stated:
Being blind doesn’t rid you of societal views whether that be on race or beauty. It's not merely about physically seeing images, but constant exposure to conversation about those images and understanding that celebrities are extremely thin/beautiful.
Another late-blind woman commented:
Mass media is not supportive and didn’t help me gain confidence in myself. I’ve struggled with not being perfect, the movie image of what a woman should be. [I’m] not tall, not blonde, not thin and I’m blind too.

Emphasizing exposure to same-sex comparison and opposite-sex judgment through colleagues and friends, one sighted woman stated:
Peers form a natural comparison for me as to our bodies and the differences between them, sometimes making me feel more confident in my own body but they can also make me feel less confident. School is similar to peers, comparisons to other girls’ bodies but also knowing that boys are judging the way we look makes me feel more self conscious about how I look.

In the male group, we found a significant relationship between visual experience and information sources: X² (4, N = 56) = 11, p < .01 (see Table 3). Here, blind men were more influenced by family and siblings, while sighted men were influenced by mass media and individuals at school or work. One late-blind man explained, “I’ve been made to feel by my family and friends that since I’ve lost my eyesight that I’ve lost my looks as well.” Another late-blind man stated:
I rely on others’ comments about bodies—try to figure out where I fit in. I think most of my colleagues, friends and family must be slimmer than me, though not all are as strong or fit as I am.
Lastly, when asked about family, one congenitally blind man stated, “Family made me conscious of what was expected by the sighted world.”

Blind women and men mentioned triggers of body dissatisfaction. One congenitally blind woman stated:
I often ate snack foods in my room and felt hungry and lonely. These were emotionally difficult [or] traumatic experiences. I wanted to have control over food options, but I know I’ve done some binge eating to try and deal with that sense of deprivation I often felt.
Another sighted woman commented on eating habits and stress to fit to societal standards by stating:
I noticed thoughts about how eating certain foods or too much causes weight and I tend to obsess about weight loss and ways to make that happen. It's talked about so much in mass media and my ex boyfriend talked about my food intake, body shape and weight every day. This made me extremely self-conscious.

Discussion

The current research is the first to explore the effect of visual experience on sociocultural attitudes, mass media, body image satisfaction, and body esteem in congenitally blind, late blind, and sighted men and women. Our data allow us to better understand the extent to which visual experience influences body satisfaction and body esteem through the construction and internalization of idealized images conveyed through social channels, such as media, family, peers, and school. We measured sociocultural attitudes toward appearance as well as sources of influence on the perceived body image in congenitally and late-blind individuals, to gain insight into whether visual experience impacts body satisfaction and ultimately triggers eating disorders symptomatology.

In a recent study, Nava et al., (2021) found that late-blind individuals did not display any difference in their own body representation compared to their sighted counterparts, while congenitally blind individuals strongly differed in the metric representation of physical features. These differences, however, did not extend to metric features of the ideal body image. This supports previous findings suggesting that one's internal body representation depends on visual experience in the first years of life (Ley et al., 2013; Nava et al., 2021), while learning an ideal body template may not require visual experience.

Compared to blind women, sighted women reported considering mass media a crucial information source of ideals. In addition, they reported enhanced perceived pressure to conform to these ideals, as well as stronger internalization, which was unobserved in blind individuals. Late-blind women showed comparable levels of internalization of general and athletic body ideals typically conveyed through the media, suggesting that previous visual experience is sufficient to prime metric body representations (Longo & Haggard, 2012) that may serve at a level of social comparison (Longo & Haggard, 2012; Nava et al., 2021; Page & Papps, 2018). It further highlights the idea that females living with vision impairment are as predisposed to internalizing unhealthy ideals as sighted females. Indeed, while body esteem was significantly higher in congenitally blind women than their sighted counterparts, in line with previous findings (Ashikali & Dittmar, 2012; Gebauer et al., 2019), late-blind women did not differ from sighted women in self-rated sexual attraction.

We found no difference in body esteem between blind and sighted men. Sighted males showed higher internalization of athletic ideals, however, when they were compared to their blind counterparts, and influence for this group was mostly attributed to family and peers. For children, dolls offer an image of the body that is likely to be internalized as part of the child's perception of the “correct” body image (Kuther & McDonald, 2004). Hence, boys, who are generally less often exposed to these models, are more prone to wishing to look different based on comparisons and feedback given by siblings and peers, rather than dolls (Dunkley et al., 2001).

Limitations

There are some limitations to consider when interpreting these findings. Firstly, since this study was conducted online, vision status was based on self-report. Secondly, the small sample size and low ethnic diversity limited generalizability. Thirdly, using a voluntary sample of participants and a self-constructed questionnaire includes susceptibility to bias and lack of evidence supporting adaptability of the materials. Lastly, not all visually impaired subjects were equally trained in the use of screen readers and other assistive technologies, therefore, a multi-structured survey might have been challenging to some of the participants.

Future Research

The study provides base for further research, it also suggests the need for inclusive resources and accessible intervention and prevention programs that are aimed at detrimental social influences among the blind population. Furthermore, future examination could help researchers in developing tailored approaches for effectively improving integration of communities of blind and sighted people in the context of body image and societal pressures, as well as examining the psychological aspects of internalization.

In summary, our results suggest that the role of visual experience and the sources through which a person obtains information about body ideals and their own body image are important in shaping the construct of personal body image, further confirming that pressures to conform to an ideal standard of beauty transpose across sexes.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-jvb-10.1177_0145482X241235167 - Supplemental material for Sociocultural Pressures, Internalization, and Body Esteem in Congenitally Blind, Late-Blind, and Sighted Men and Women

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jvb-10.1177_0145482X241235167 for Sociocultural Pressures, Internalization, and Body Esteem in Congenitally Blind, Late-Blind, and Sighted Men and Women by Sara Dell’Erba, Meike Scheller, Alexandra A. de Sousa and Michael J. Proulx in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness

Gender	Congenitally Blind	Late Blind	Typically Sighted	Total
Female	17	10	29	56
Male	10	11	24	45
Total	27	21	53	101

Congenitally blind males	Congenitally blind females	Late bind males	Late blind females
Retinopathy of prematurity (2) Full optic nerve damage (1) Underdeveloped optic nerve (1) Fraser syndrome (1) Congenital with light perception (1) Leber's congenital amaurosis (1) Cause not reported (3)	Congenital cataracts (1) Genetic mutation (1) Detached retinas (1) Leber's congenital amaurosis Retinopathy of prematurity (3) Septum optic dysplasia (1) Anaridia and nystagmus (1) Cause not reported (8)	Retinitis Pigmentosa (2) Infantile cataracts (1) Retinal detachments (1) Secondary onset glaucoma (1) Cataracts (1) Cause not reported (5)	Congenital glaucoma (1) Retinitis Pigmentosa (2) Optic nerve atrophy (1) Diabetic retinopathy (1) Genetic degenerative eye disease (Stargardt) (1) Traumatic brain injury (1) Age related macular degeneration (AMD) (1) Cause not reported (2)

Sex	Sightedness	Family	Siblings	Peers	Mass-media	School/work	n
Female	Blind	93	67	89	56	44	27
	Sighted	76	38	90	90	86	29
Male	Blind	81	48	76	57	38	21
	Sighted	61	39	78	75	61	24

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Michael J. Proulx is partly funded by CAMERA 2.0, the UKRI [UK Research and Innovation] Centre for the Analysis of Motion, Entertainment Research and Applications (EP/T014865/1).

ORCID iDs

Meike Scheller

Alexandra A. de Sousa

Sara Dell’Erba

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Aparicio-Martinez

Perea-Moreno

A. J.

Martinez-Jimenez

M. P.

Redel-Macías

M. D.

Pagliari

Vaquero-Abellan

(2019). Social media, thin-ideal, body dissatisfaction and disordered eating attitudes: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), 4177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214177

Ashikali

E. M.

Dittmar

(2012). The effect of priming materialism on women’s responses to thin-ideal media: Materialism and women’s body dissatisfaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02020.x

Azañón

Camacho

Morales

Longo

M. R.

(2018). The sensitive period for tactile remapping does not include early infancy. Child Development, 89(4), 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12813

Baker

Sivyer

Towell

(1998). Body image dissatisfaction and eating attitudes in visually impaired women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 24(3), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199811)24:3<319::aid-eat10>3.0.co;2-r

Bech-Sørensen

Pollet

T. V.

(2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6

Betz

N. E.

Mintz

Speakmon

(1994). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-reported weight. Sex Roles, 30(7-8), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01420801

Birkeland

Thompson

J. K.

Herbozo

Roehrig

Cafri

van den Berg

(2005). Media exposure, mood, and body image dissatisfaction: An experimental test of person versus product priming. Body Image, 2(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.11.002

Cafri

Yamamiya

Brannick

Thompson

J. K.

(2005). The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpi053

Cicmil

Eli

(2014). Body image among eating disorder patients with disabilities: A review of published case studies. Body Image, 11(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.04.001

10.

Cusumano

D. L.

Thompson

J. K.

(1997). Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: Exposure, awareness, and internalization. Sex Roles, 37(9–10), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02936336

11.

Dittmar

Halliwell

Ive

(2006). Does barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.283

12.

Dunkley

T. L.

Wertheim

E. H.

Paxton

S. J.

(2001). Examination of a model of multiple sociocultural influences on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction and dietary restraint. Adolescence, 36(142), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00741.x

13.

Edwards

Launder

(2000). Investigating muscularity concerns in male body image: Development of the Swansea Muscularity Attitudes Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(200007)28:1<120::aid-eat15>3.0.co;2-h

14.

Fallon

(1990). Culture in the mirror: Sociocultural determinants of body image. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 80–109). Guilford Press.

15.

Fernández-Aranda

Crespo

J. M.

Jiménez-Murcia

Krug

Vallejo

(2006). Blindness and bulimia nervosa: A description of a case report and its treatment. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39(3), 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20259

16.

Franzoi

S. L.

Shields

S. A.

(1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_12

17.

Gaudio

Brooks

S. J.

Riva

(2014). Nonvisual multisensory impairment of body perception in anorexia Nervosa: A systematic review of neuropsychological studies. PLoS One, 9(10), e110087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110087

18.

Gebauer

Guenther

Stuerz

(2019). Differences in the body images of blind and sighted women. European Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000029

19.

Grabe

Ward

L. M.

Hyde

J. S.

(2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460

20.

Green

S. P.

Pritchard

M. E.

(2003). Predictors of body image dissatisfaction in adult men and women. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.215

21.

Grogan

Richards

(2002). Body image: Focus groups with boys and men. Men and Masculinities, 4(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184(02004003001

22.

Heider

Spruyt

De Houwer

(2015). Implicit beliefs about ideal body image predict body image dissatisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01402

23.

Homan

(2010). Athletic-ideal and thin-ideal internalization as prospective predictors of body dissatisfaction, dieting, and compulsive exercise. Body Image, 7(3), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.02.004

24.

Hoyt

W. D.

Kogan

L. R.

(2001). Satisfaction with body image and peer relationships for males and females in a college environment. Sex Roles, 45, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013501827550

25.

Jacobi

Cash

T. F.

(1994). In pursuit of the perfect appearance: Discrepancies among self-ideal percepts of multiple physical attributes 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(5), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00588.x

26.

Kaplan-Myrth

(2000). Alice without a looking glass: Blind people and body image. Anthropology & Medicine, 7(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/713650612

27.

Karazsia

B. T.

Crowther

J. H.

(2009). Social body comparison and internalization: Mediators of social influences on men’s muscularity-oriented body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 6(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.12.003

28.

Kenrick

D. T.

Gutierres

S. E.

(1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.131

29.

Knobloch-Westerwick

(2015). Thinspiration: Self-improvement versus self-evaluation social comparisons with thin-ideal Media portrayals. Health Communication, 30(11), 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.921270

30.

Kocourkova

Soltysova

Mohaplova

Hrdlicka

(2011). Anorexia nervosa in a blind girl. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 32(6), 748–750.

31.

Kuther

T. L.

McDonald

(2004). Early adolescents' experiences with, and views of Barbie. Adolescence, 39(153), 39–51.

32.

Lavin

M. A.

Cash

T. F.

(2001). Effects of exposure to information about appearance stereotyping and discrimination on women’s body images. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1<51::AID-EAT8>3.0.CO;2-Q

33.

Lee

H.-H.

(2021). Social media photo activity, internalization, appearance comparison, and body satisfaction: The moderating role of photo-editing behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106579

34.

Ley

Bottari

Shenoy

B. H.

Kekunnaya

Röder

(2013). Partial recovery of visual–spatial remapping of touch after restoring vision in a congenitally blind man. Neuropsychologia, 51(6), 1119–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.004

35.

Longo

M. R.

Haggard

(2012). Implicit body representations and the conscious body image. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.015

36.

Mishkind

M. E.

Rodin

Silberstein

L. R.

Striegel-Moore

R. H.

(1986). The embodiment of masculinity: Cultural, psychological, and behavioral dimensions. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276486029005004

37.

Morgan

. (1993). You too can have a body like mine: Reflections on the male body and masculinities (2004). In Sue Scott, David Morgan (Ed.), Body matters (1st ed., pp. 80–99). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646014-11

38.

Nava

Tamè

Giurgola

Bolognini

(2021). Congenital visual deprivation modulates the perception of own, but not others’ body size. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-215187/v1

39.

Nichter

Bordo

(1995). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Contemporary Sociology, 24(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075082

40.

Page

Papps

F. A.

(2018). Eating attitudes of women living with a vision impairment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318792853

41.

Pasqualotto

Proulx

M. J.

(2012). The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.008

42.

Pazzaglia

Zantedeschi

(2016). Plasticity and awareness of bodily distortion. Neural Plasticity, 2016, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9834340

43.

Peelen

M. V.

Downing

P. E.

(2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2195

44.

Phillips

de Man

A. F.

(2010). Weight status and body image satisfaction in adult men and women. North American Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 171–184.

45.

Pinquart

Pfeiffer

J. P.

(2012). Body image in adolescents with and without visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 30(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619612458098

46.

Presnell

Bearman

S. K.

Stice

(2004). Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: A prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36(4), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20045

47.

Robinson

Prichard

Nikolaidis

Drummond

Tiggemann

(2017). Idealised media images: The effect of fitspiration imagery on body satisfaction and exercise behaviour. Body Image, 22, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.06.001

48.

Scheller

Matorres

Little

A. C.

Tompkins

de Sousa

A. A.

(2021). The role of vision in the emergence of mate preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(8), 3785–3797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01901-w

49.

Simeunovic Ostojic

Hansen

A. M. J.

(2013). Sociocultural factors in the development of bulimia nervosa in a blind woman: A case report: Bulimia Nervosa in blind women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22058

50.

Thompson

J. K.

van den Berg

Roehrig

Guarda

A. S.

Heinberg

L. J.

(2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes toward Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10257

51.

Tiggemann

Zaccardo

(2015). “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: The effect of fitspiration imagery on women’s body image. Body Image, 15, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003

52.

Touyz

S. W.

O’Sullivan

B. T.

Gertler

Beumont

P. J. V.

(1988). Anorexia Nervosa in a woman totally blind since birth. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153(2), 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.153.2.248

53.

Tovée

M. J.

Maisey

D. S.

Emery

J. L.

Cornelissen

P. L.

(1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1415), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0624

54.

Wolf

(1991). The Beauty Myth. Vintage Books.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Sociocultural Pressures,Internalization,and Body Esteem in Congenitally Blind,Late-Blind,and Sighted Men and Women

Abstract

Keywords

Method

Participants

SATAQ-3

BESQ

Data Analysis

Sociodemographic Survey

Results

Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance and Body Esteem

Males

Females

Sociodemographic Survey

Discussion

Limitations

Future Research

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-jvb-10.1177_0145482X241235167 - Supplemental material for Sociocultural Pressures, Internalization, and Body Esteem in Congenitally Blind, Late-Blind, and Sighted Men and Women

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material