Educational Impact of Using the VISSIT to Determine Service Delivery Time of Itinerant Teachers of Students With Visual Impairments

Abstract

High-quality education for students with visual impairments starts with service intensity determination based on the needs of students by teachers of students with visual impairments (Lewis & Allman, 2017; Spungin et al., 2016). Even though the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) emphasizes addressing students’ needs for service delivery (United States Department of Education, 2004), some teachers of students with visual impairments continue taking other factors such as caseload size into account for service intensity determination (Pogrund et al., 2019). Similarly, The Michigan Vision Services Severity Rating Scale (Michigan Department of Education, 2017) does not focus on the individual needs of the students to recommend service time. For example, it considers teachers’ availability such as travel time while determining service intensity. It also uses students’ visual condition as a criterion, which may not always accurately reflect the needs of the students for service delivery time.

Keywords

VISSIT visual impairment itinerant teachers service delivery time IEP

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Lewis

Allman

C. B.

(2017). Educational programming. In Holbrook

M. C.

McCarthy

Kamei-Hannan

(Eds), Foundations of education: History and theory of teaching children and youths with visual impairments (3rd ed., pp. 280–321). AFB Press.

Michigan Department of Education . (2017). The Michigan Vision Services Severity Rating Scale. https://mdelio.org/blind-visually-impaired/educator-support/severity-rating-scales

Pogrund

R. L.

Darst

Munro

M. P.

(2015). Initial validation study for a scale used to determine service intensity for itinerant teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(6), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900602

Pogrund

R. L.

Darst

Munro

(2019). Determining type and amount of service delivery time by teachers of students with visual impairments: Results of a national validation study of the VISSIT. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X19845756

Sapp

Hatlen

(2010). The expanded core curriculum: Where we have been, where we are going, and how we can get there. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(6), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1010400604

Spungin

S. J.

Ferrell

K. A.

Monson

(2016). The role and function of the teacher of students with visual impairments [Position paper]. Council for Exceptional Children.

US Department of Education . (2004). Regulations: Part 300 [A]300.8 [c] 3. In Building the legacy: IDEA 2004 (Child with a disability). http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cregs%2C300%2CD%2C300%252E320%2C

10.

VISSIT . (2014). Visual impairment scale of service intensity of Texas. http://www.tsbvi.edu/vissit

11.

Yin

(2014). Case study research: Design & methods. SAGE Publications.