CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
De l'AuneW. R., WelshR. L., & WilliamsM. D. (2000). A national outcomes assessment of the rehabilitation of adults with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 281–291.
3.
GoodrichG. L., & KirbyJ. (2001). A comparison of patient reading performance and preference: Optical devices, handheld CCTV (Innoventions Magni-Cam), or stand-mounted CCTV (Optelec Clearview or TSI Genie). Optometry, 72, 519–528.
4.
GoodrichG. L., KirbyJ., KeswickC., OrosT., WagstaffP., DonaldB., HazanJ., & PetersL. (2000). Training the patient with low vision to read: Does it significantly improve function? In StuenC., ArditiA., HorowitzA., LangM. A., RosenthalB., & SeidmanK. (Eds.), Vision ‘99: Vision rehabilitation: Assessment, intervention and outcomes (pp. 230–236). New York: Swets & Zeitlinger.
5.
GoodrichG. L., KirbyJ., OrosT., WagstaffP., McDevittB., HazanJ., & PetersL. (2004). Goldilocks and the three training models: A comparison of three models of low vision reading training efficiency. Visual Impairment Research, 6(2–3), 135–152.
6.
LongR. G., CrewsJ. E., & MancilR. (2000). Creating measures of rehabilitation outcomes for people who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 292–306.
7.
MassofR. W., & RubinG. S. (2001). Visual function assessment questionnaires. Survey of Ophthalmology, 45(6), 531–548.
8.
StelmackJ. A., StelmackT. R., & MassofR. W. (2002). Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science, 43, 2859–2868.
9.
SzlykJ. P., StelmackJ., MassofR. W., StelmackT. R., Demers-Turco, WilliamsR. T., & WrightB. D. (2004). Performance of the veterans affairs low vision visual functioning questionnaire. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 261–275.