Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To meet the global energy demands, the exploitation of coalbed methane has received increasing attention. Biogeochemical parameters of co-produced water from coalbed methane wells were performed in the No. 3 coal seam in the Shizhuangnan block of the southern Qinshui Basin (China). These biogeochemical parameters were firstly utilized to assess coal reservoir environments and corresponding coalbed methane production. A high level of Na⁺ and HCO₃^– and deuterium drift were found to be accompanied by high gas production rates, but these parameters are unreliable to some extent. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) isotopes δ¹³C_DIC from water can be used to distinguish the environmental redox conditions. Positive δ¹³C_DIC values within a reasonable range suggest reductive conditions suitable for methanogen metabolism and were accompanied by high gas production rates. SO₄^2–, NO₃^– and related isotopes affected by various bacteria corresponding to various redox conditions are considered effective parameters to identify redox states and gas production rates. Importantly, the combination of δ¹³C_DIC and SO₄^2– can be used to evaluate gas production rates and predict potentially beneficial areas. The wells with moderate δ¹³C_DIC and negligible SO₄^2– represent appropriate reductive conditions, as observed in most high and intermediate production wells. Furthermore, the wells with highest δ¹³C_DIC and negligible SO₄^2– exhibit low production rates, as the most reductive environments were too strict to extend pressure drop funnels.

Keywords

Coalbed methane gas production biogeochemistry isotope analysis dissolved inorganic carbon

Introduction

Coalbed methane (CBM) is becoming increasingly developed worldwide as an unconventional energy resource, with an increasing number of publications establishing CBM as efficient clean energy source (Baldassare et al., 2014). CBM is trapped in micropore structures of coal reservoirs due to formation pressure, while the coalbed is saturated with groundwater. During extraction of CBM, it is essential to remove aquifer water from the coalbed to lower reservoir pressure. Meanwhile, large volume of water is inevitably produced when CBM is formed. A variety of geochemical processes exist in coal reservoir water. Thus, CBM co-produced water serves as an indicator of these processes it has been subjected to, which could provide valuable information on its evolution (Moore, 2012). Additionally, CBM co-produced water may act as a signature to allow an improved understanding of CBM preservation and enrichment, which can be used as a tool to analyze gas production rates in the processes of CBM exploration (Wu et al., 2018).

The Qinshui Basin is a coal-bearing basin located in southeastern Shanxi in central China, with a long history of coal exploitation predominantly in the southern part of the Qinshui Basin. This region has received increasing interest for the availability of commercially valuable CBM reserve (Wang et al., 2015). The Shizhuangnan (SZN) block is one of the most commercially successful regions for CBM exploitation in the southern Qinshui Basin, where more than 1500 gas wells drilled since CBM exploration and exploitation commenced in 2010 (Zhang et al., 2015). Some studies have concluded that the geochemical signatures of coal reservoir water from the southern Qinshui Basin are similar to those of other important global CBM production regions, with the major characteristics being higher Na⁺, K⁺, HCO₃^– concentrations and lower Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, SO₄^2– concentrations (Cai et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2014). In the study area, previous studies have shown that chemical data from analysis of CBM co-produced water yield valuable information on the geochemistry and evolution of coal reservoir water (Zhang et al., 2015, 2016).

To date, few studies have assessed how geochemistry is affected by microbial mechanisms and identify links between groundwater environments and CBM production in the Shizhuanganan block. In particular, sulfate-reducing bacteria are considered to out-compete methanogens for nutrients in scenarios of sufficient SO₄^2– availability, while methanogens are more active under low SO₄^2– conditions. Sulfate reduction and denitrification via the removal of SO₄^2– and NO₃^– is performed by the corresponding bacteria under diverse redox conditions (Mayumi et al., 2016). Biogeochemical features are significant parameters that have the potential to infer coal reservoir environments and redox conditions, for estimation of the closure degree of targeted coal reservoirs and effective CBM conservation and production. Therefore, in this study, a full year of water samples were systematically collected at various time points from the No. 3 coal seam in the SZN CBM region of the southern Qinshui Basin. Some major ions and stable isotopes affected by microbia in the water samples were investigated. This allowed analysis of the relationship between biogeochemical features and redox states, with assessment of their potential impact on CBM exploration within the CBM production period.

Geological setting

Structure

The Qinshui Basin is a tectonic Mesozoic basin which has evolved since the Late Paleozoic era in the North China Craton Basin in southeast Shanxi province (China), which is a complex synclinorium basin striking an NNE–SSW trajectory (Du et al., 2019). The southern Qinshui Basin CBM block is divided into SZN, Chengzhuang, Fanzhuang, Panzhuang, Shizhuangbei and Zhengzhuang, covering an area of approximately 23,923 km² (Figure 1(b)). The SZN block covers an area of approximately 950 km² and is located in the southern Qinshui Basin region where production accounts for the vast majority (>90%) of total CBM production in the Qinshui Basin (Tao et al., 2014).

Figure 1.

(a) Main structure outline and CBM well sampling distribution in the Shizhuangnan block. (b) The location of the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui Basin of China (SZN: Shizhuangnan CBM block; FZ: Fanzhuang CBM block; MB: Mabi CBM block; PZ: Panzhuang CBM block; ZZ: Zhengzhuang CBM block). (c) Delineation of the strata and aquifer characteristics for the southern Qinshui Basin.

As shown in Figure 1(c), the strata in the SZN block contains Benxi, Fengfeng, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Shihezi, Shiqianfeng formations, with loose quaternary sediments. In the study area, the No. 3 coal seam from the lower Permian Shanxi formation and the No. 15 coal seam from the upper Carboniferous Taiyuan formation are the major minable coal-bearing formations, with thick continuous lateral coal-bearing seams and relatively stable distributions (Guo et al., 2017).

Hydrogeology

Weather conditions in the study area consist of a temperate continental monsoon climate, with an average annual rainfall of 627 mm and average annual evaporation of 1645 mm. Surface discharge in the study area occurs through bedrock channels of varying sizes, with low flow or dry streams in the dry season and rainfall supplied in the rainy season. The groundwater of strata is supplied from injection of meteoric water in the southern outcrop area of the SZN block (Zhang et al., 2015, 2016).

Various aquifers exist in this region, including the Quaternary aquifer, the T₁l-P₂sh-P₂s aquifer, the P₁x-P₁s aquifer, the C₃t aquifer and the Ordovician aquifer. The No. 3 coal seam is part of the P₁x-P₁s aquifer formed by weak fractured sandstone, while the No. 15 coal seam is part of the C₃t aquifer formed by fractured sandstone and karst-fissured limestone (Figure 1(c)). Generally, the coal aquifers are limited by water resisting layers composed of shale or mudstone. Therefore, these aquifers are separated from other aquifers by aquifuges. The P₁x-P₁s and C₃t aquifers have important roles in storage and exploitation of target gas resources (Cai et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015).

Coal reservoir for CBM exploitation

In the Shizhuangan block, the No. 3 coal seam is located in the middle-lower part of the Shanxi formation. The CBM seam is a primary mining target due to its continuous distribution and tectonic conditions. The No. 3 coal seam in the north is slightly thicker than in the south, and the depth of the seam in the north is relatively deeper than in the south. The No. 3 coal seam contains semi-bright coal, bright coal and a small amount of calcareous mudstone interbed or mudstone. The average value of reservoir pressure gradient (0.66 MPa/100 m) in the No. 3 coal seam indicates that it is generally an under-pressure reservoir (Zhang et al., 2016).

The SZN block is a synclinal basin, lying south of the Taihang Mountains and bound by the northwestern Sitou arc-shaped normal fault (Figure 1(a)). In general, the Sitou fault exerts a positive influence on gas accumulation due to its sealing capability (Zhang et al., 2015). Hence, the SZN block is a suitable region for CBM exploitation. In this study, it is hypothesized that CBM wells with gas production rates of more than 1000 m³/day are high production wells, while CBM wells with gas production rates ranging from 500 to 1000 m³/day are intermediate production wells, and those with gas production rates less than 500 m³/day are low production wells.

Material and methods

Samples collection

To comprehensively analyze the geochemical characteristics of coal seam water, a total of 61 CBM co-produced water samples were collected from the No. 3 coal seam over three sampling rounds between 2018 and 2019. CBM co-produced water samples were collected within various climatic conditions, with three sample collections performed on sampling days in October 2018, February 2019 and June 2019. All of the selected CBM wells began production before 2013 with a sufficiently stable and relatively long drainage phase.

Hydraulic fracturing with 2% KCl is widely used in the south Qinshui Basin, by which most of CBM wells were disposed before drainage across the study area. CBM co-produced water often exhibits major differences to original formation water, particularly when hydraulic fracturing has been used (Salmachi et al., 2013). The contamination impact of fracturing fluid on CBM co-produced water sample is significant (Fan et al., 2019). Stable and long drainage period was adopted to weaken the contamination influence of fracturing fluid. Zhang et al. (2016) reported that 10 meq/L Cl^– concentrations could be considered a cut-off point for evaluation of the degree of fracturing fluid contamination, with Cl^– concentrations below 10 meq/L indicating no influence of fracturing fluid on hydrochemical signatures. In the present study, Cl^– concentration of all water samples was less than 10 meq/L, suggesting that the effect of fracturing fluid could be ignored. All sampling locations are shown in Figure 1(a) including high, intermediate and low production wells.

Prior to water collection, 5 L sterilized high density polyethylene sampling bottles were flushed three times with the target water. For chemical and isotope analyses, the bottles were filled and sealed with caps, minimizing headspace air without contact pipe opening of CBM wells to avoid contamination during the sampling process. Filtration and acidification of water sample were considered unnecessary due to large capacity and stable drainage of the water flow.

Analytical methods

To assess the hydrochemical behavior of coal seam water across the study area, chemical parameters and isotope compositions were analyzed. For each collected water sample, HCO₃^– was quantified by acid titration via the Gran-alkalinity titration method. The determination of other cation and anion concentrations was performed using a Perkin–Elmer Optima 5100DV Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer and a Dionex Ion Chromatograph model 3000 with an AS23 analytical column. δ¹⁸O and δD isotopes in the co-produced water were tested by isotope ratio mass spectrometry with a precision of ±1‰ for δD and ±0.2‰ for δ¹⁸O. To measure δ¹³C_DIC isotopic values in water samples, CO₂ was generated by pre-treatment with phosphoric acid, with an analytical precision of ±0.15‰. Isotope analysis was performed using a Thermo Quest Finnigan Delta Plus XL continuous flow gas ratio mass spectrometer. To determine the isotopic composition of $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}^{}}^{}$ , SO₂ was generated in water samples by chemical reaction, with an analytical precision of ±0.2‰.

Results and discussion

Major ion composition and CBM production

The chemical data from CBM co-produced water could provide an effective method for investigating the evolution of groundwater. Several major ions (Na⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, K⁺, HCO₃^–, Cl^– CO₃^2– and SO₄^2– usually account for the vast majority of solutes in coal reservoir water (Owen et al., 2015; Pashin et al., 2014). As shown in Table 1, in the study area, the key geochemical distributions of the main cations and anions were similar to those reported for other CBM production areas, such as the Powder River Basin and San Juan Basin (Flores et al., 2008; Rice et al., 2008). In the study area, the major cation concentrations were ranked in the order: Na⁺ > Ca²⁺ > K⁺ > Mg²⁺, while the major anion concentrations were ranked in the order: HCO₃^– > Cl^– > CO₃^2– > SO₄^2–. The concentration of total dissolved solid (TDS) was calculated by the sum of major cations (Na⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺ and K⁺) and anions (HCO₃^–, Cl^– CO₃^2– and SO₄^2–), ranging from 703.18 to 2270.39 mg/L. Regression analysis shows that TDS is positively correlated to Na⁺ and HCO₃^– concentrations, with correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.75, respectively (Figure 2).

Table 1.

Sampling arrangement and major parameters assessed in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block.

Sampling round	Sampling date	Sampling number	Na⁺ (mg/L)	HCO₃^– (mg/L)	SO₄^2– (mg/L)	NO₃^– (mg/L)	TDS (mg/L)	δD (‰)	δ¹⁸O (‰)	δ¹³C_DIC (‰)
First	Oct. 2018	17	206.94 to 523.13	368.54 to 905.50	0 to 7.62	19.80 to 64.23	703.18 to 1718.04	–84.93 to –69.29	–11.42 to –10.53	–40.37 to –13.04
Second	Feb. 2019	21	242.02 to 628.80	388.16 to 1177.86	0 to 7.20	5.14 to 58.61	775.29 to 2270.39	–81.17 to –72.53	–11.78 to –10.21	–35.66 to –11.14
Third	Jun. 2019	23	202.86 to 462.17	408.07 to 870.19	0 to 6.50	7.07 to 67.20	880.35 to 1455.30	–78.17 to –72.27	–8.78 to –9.79	–38.78 to –11.63

Figure 2.

Plot of TDS versus Νa⁺ and HCO₃^– concentrations in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block.

With groundwater evolution and migration, a variety of chemical reactions influence its compositions (Pan and Wood, 2015). The Na⁺ concentrations dominate the major cation compounds, ranging from 206.94 to 608.80 mg/L. The main Na⁺ source in coal reservoir water may be dissolved from silicate and other minerals. In addition to mineral dissolution, secondary processes, such as ion exchange between Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ and Na⁺, can cause further enrichment of Na⁺ (Warner et al., 2013). The concentrations of Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ were found to range from 0.86 to 6.38 mg/L and from 0.51 to 4.32 mg/L, respectively. Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ are likely to originate from the dissolution of carbonate and associated minerals, and Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ concentrations are controlled by limits of inorganic carbonate precipitation and cation exchange in anoxic coal reservoir environments (Jian and Lu, 2017). The HCO₃^– concentrations account for a majority of anion compounds, ranging from 368.54 to 1177.86 mg/L. Enrichment of HCO₃^– potentially occurs through organic matter breakdown, methane oxidation and carbonate dissolution. Generally, Cl^– concentrations range from 39.03 to 256.04 mg/L, which may originate from evaporite in coal aquifers (Cheung et al., 2010). SO₄^2– concentrations likely originate from dissolution of silicate and gypsum minerals, and sulfide mineral oxidation like pyrite near surface could increase the amount of SO₄^2– in coal reservoir water. It is noted that SO₄^2– is progressively removed from coal seam water through sulfate reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria (Glossner et al., 2016). In the present study, the SO₄^2– concentrations were particularly low, ranging from 0 to 7.62 mg/L. Hence, the joint effects of various geochemical activities such as biological activity, cation exchange, precipitation and dissolution of some minerals result in the eventually chemical signatures.

Based on previous studies, higher HCO₃^– and Na⁺ concentrations and lower SO₄^2–, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ concentrations are commonly observed in coal reservoir water from CBM wells with high gas production rates. Generally, the concentrations of SO₄^2–, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ in recharge and runoff area are relatively higher than in stranded area, while concentrations of HCO₃^– and Na⁺ are higher in stranded area. The stranded area implies certain closed conditions with higher pressures, which are favorable for CBM conservation and exploitation (Tao et al., 2017). Although high CBM production rates are associated with areas enriched in Na⁺ and HCO₃^– and depleted in SO₄^2–, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, not all hydrochemical parameters correspond to high CBM production rates in a specific CBM production region. In the SZN block, there is a strong correlation between HCO₃^– and Na⁺ with gas production rates. As shown in Figure 3, high Na⁺ concentrations (>300 mg/L) and HCO₃^– concentrations (>600 mg/L) are associated with CBM wells with high and intermediate gas production rates.

Figure 3.

Plot of Na⁺ and HCO₃^– concentrations versus gas production rates (indicated by size and color of symbols) in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block.

In terms of groundwater geochemical conditions, the discrepancies could be attributed to the coal reservoir environments and the drainage pattern differences over time among these CBM wells (Wu et al., 2019). A long production period and a large water discharge result in the expansion of pressure drop range facilitating carbonate dissolution, cation exchange and subsequent increase in Na⁺ and HCO₃^– concentrations. Furthermore, more CO₂ entering coal reservoir water within CBM production period is another important factor for increased HCO₃^– concentrations in the water from high gas production wells (Vidic et al., 2013).

Characteristic pattern of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes and CBM production

$δ D_{H_{2} O}$ and $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ from CBM co-produced water in the SZN block were found to range from –84.93 to –69.29 and from –11.78 to –8.78, respectively. The local meteoric water line (LMWL) was used to assess groundwater source, described in equation (1) (Zhang et al., 2015)

δ D = 7 .0 1 δ^{18} O + 0. 11

(1)

Based on previous studies, the distributions of $δ D_{H_{2} O}$ and $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ along the LMWL could be used as a hydrological index to determine meteoric source (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Plot of $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ versus $δ D_{H_{2} O}$ from CBM co-produced water in the Shizhuangnan block (LMWL: local meteoric water line; LEL: local evaporation line).

These isotopes are located on two sides of the LMWL, with some $δ D_{H_{2} O}$ and $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ values situated above or to the left of the LMWL resulting from D drift, while other isotopes are located below or to the right of the LMWL resulting from ¹⁸O drift. Additionally, the isotopic points of third samples are located near the local evaporation line (LEL), with LEL expression described according to equation (2) (Zhang et al., 2015)

δ D = 2.67 δ^{18} O - 51.63

(2)

According to previous studies, it is likely that isotopes shift to below or right of the LMWL due to high temperature fluid–rock interaction and evaporation (Vinson et al., 2017). In the present study, a relatively large change in $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ was observed, indicating that ¹⁸O drift is related to adjacent aquifers. It can be inferred that the coal reservoir water exchanges O with adjacent aquifer rocks, with enrichment in ¹⁸O readily causing ¹⁸O drift in the coal reservoir water, as described by equation (3) (Wang et al., 2013)

{CaCO}_{2}^{18} O (carbonate) + H_{2} O \to {CaCO}_{3} + H_{2}^{18} O

(3)

Therefore, these wells exhibiting ¹⁸O drift in the coal reservoir water may not be capable of forming valid pressure drop funnels and may exhibit low gas production rates.

In contrast, D drift indicates that CBM co-produced water originates from coal reservoirs and exhibits weak connectivity with adjacent aquifers, resulting in high CBM production rates. Generally, D drift is affected by a combination of open carbon dioxide systems, microorganic functions and low-temperature fluid–rock interactions (Zhang et al., 2018). These processes utilize H resulting in D enrichment in residual groundwater. In the present study, low-temperature fluid–rock interactions and biological activities tend to result in D drift in coal formation water (Bao et al., 2016; Hamilton et al., 2014). Moreover, hydrogen sulfide produced by thermal evolution and sulfate reduction dissolved in coal reservoir water may lead to hydrogen isotope exchange as defined in equation (4)

HDS + H_{2} O = H_{2} S + HDO

(4)

Furthermore, hydrocarbon exchange among all kinds of hydrocarbon radical-containing compounds further contributes to D drift under reductive coal reservoir conditions as indicated by Gui et al. (2005), shown in Equation (5)

H_{2} O + D (coal) \to HDO + H (coal)

(5)

These findings suggest that D drift can be regarded as a significant indicator for high gas production rates. In contrast, O drift could be regarded as another important predictive factor suggesting low gas production rates (Huang et al., 2017). Therefore, to accurately judge the degree of hydrogen and oxygen isotope drift and their corresponding location relative to the LMWL, the D drift index (DDI) is applied, based on equation (6)

DDI = δ D - 7 .0 1 δ^{18} O - 0. 11

(6)

where DDI values of more than 0 indicate hydrogen and oxygen isotopic points above the LMWL, and DDI values of less than 0 indicate these points below the LMWL. Therefore, CBM co-produced water with a high DDI suggests that the well should have high gas production rates. As shown in Figure 5, the DDI values of first and second samples and gas production rates are positively correlated as expected. This suggests that the coal formation exhibits a satisfactory sealing ability coupled with appropriate fluid migration, which is favorable for the extension of pressure drop funnels and subsequent high gas production rates. However, the third samples are significantly different to the first and second samples, implying that the fractionations of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in groundwater were caused by meteoric precipitation. Therefore, hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in coal reservoir water are affected by a wide variety of factors. Therefore, it is not a reliable indicator for CBM production.

Figure 5.

Plot of D drift index (DDI) values versus gas production rates from CBM co-produced water in the Shizhuangnan block.

Application of dissolved inorganic carbon isotopic ratio for CBM exploration

Based on the above analysis, the hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of groundwater can be enriched through various pathways. Hence, biological activity is not a unique factor affecting hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in coal seam conditions. In comparison, inorganic carbon isotopes in groundwater are dominantly affected by methanogenic activity. The total amount of inorganic carbon species referred to as dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) includes dissolved carbonate, bicarbonate, carbonic acid and carbon dioxide in solution. DIC is readily available in the majority of coal reservoir water and mainly originates from organic matter breakdown and carbonate dissolution with significantly negative isotopic composition of δ¹³C_DIC. In contrast, positive δ¹³C_DIC is related to micro-organic activities such as methanogenesis in reductive coalbed reservoir environments (Li et al., 2016, 2019).

Methanogens are sensitive to high levels of oxidizing agents such as sulfate and nitrate, which are only active under reductive conditions. For instance, high sulfate concentrations stimulate the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria, which inhibit the activity of methanogens (An and Picardal, 2015; Davis et al., 2018). Two metabolic types of methanogenesis have been determined, involving carbon dioxide reduction or acetate fermentation. Guo et al. (2014) found that carbon dioxide reduction methanogenesis is dominantly active in the Qinshui Basin. It is generally accepted that carbon dioxide reduction removes ¹²C, forming positive δ¹³C_DIC in remaining formation water (Mori et al., 2012).

The δ¹³C_DIC values across the study region include both positive and negative values (Figure 6). Results show that δ¹³C_DIC values are strongly correlated with alkalinity (HCO₃^–), with negative δ¹³C_DIC values dominantly attributed to organic matter breakdown and carbonate dissolution, while positive δ¹³C_DIC values were induced by microbial activities, especially carbon dioxide reduction methanogenesis.

Figure 6.

Plot of HCO₃^– concentrations versus δ¹³C_DIC (‰) values in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block.

Shallow groundwater in open environments and non-coal seam water from below or above coal seam usually exhibits negative δ¹³C_DIC. Therefore, coal reservoirs with negative δ¹³C_DIC are not suitable for CBM enrichment and exploitation. It is generally accepted that positive δ¹³C_DIC is a valid indicator for the evaluation of CBM storage conditions and production rates, as a small amount of methanogenesis may result in positive δ¹³C_DIC in reductive or sealed environments (Schweitzer et al., 2019). Based on the clear association between δ¹³C_DIC values and gas production rates (Figure 7), negative δ¹³C_DIC values indicate low gas production rates as expected. However, the variables affecting gas production rates in positive δ¹³C_DIC regions are relatively complicated. High and intermediate production rates are associated with reasonably positive δ¹³C_DIC values ranging from 0 to 25, while residual wells with higher δ¹³C_DIC values (>25) exhibit low gas production rates. The negative δ¹³C_DIC values represent disadvantageous reservoir conditions for CBM storage, resulting in unsatisfactory gas production rates across the study area. When the δ¹³C_DIC values increase progressively and become positive, ideal CBM storage conditions begin to be observed, resulting in better gas production rates. However, as these δ¹³C_DIC values continue to increase, the more closed coal reservoirs with lower permeability indicate that strata pressure cannot be effectively released to form viable pressure drop funnels, although these areas usually have potential for increased production. Consequently, positive δ¹³C_DIC values do not necessarily indicate high CBM production rates unless the values fall within a reasonable range.

Figure 7.

Plot of δ¹³C_DIC (‰) values in CBM co-produced water and gas production rates in the Shizhuangnan block.

Application of redox parameter signatures associated with microbial activity for CBM exploration

With SO₄^2– depletion and aquifer evolution, relatively reductive groundwater environments are progressively established. The SO₄^2– concentrations in CBM wells with relatively high gas production rates do not commonly exceed 10 meq/L (Humez et al., 2016). In the study area, SO₄^2– was usually presented at very low level, ranging from 0 to 7.62 mg/L. NO₃^– concentrations in all co-produced water samples were in the range of 5.14–64.00 mg/L across the SZN block. Biogeochemical indicators, especially SO₄^2– and NO₃^– concentrations and their related isotopic compositions, are important criteria for the assessment of redox environments (Chen et al., 2018). For example, negligible SO₄^2– and NO₃^– concentrations indicate reductive conditions which are favorable for CBM conservation and enrichment.

As shown in Figure 8(a), high SO₄^2– concentrations are not associated with high gas production rates, while high gas production rates occur in CBM wells at low or absent SO₄^2– concentrations (Hakil et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2017). However, in contrast to our prediction, CBM wells at low NO₃^– concentrations exhibit relatively low gas production rates (Figure 8(b)). High gas production rates are only detected when NO₃^– have not been completely consumed by microorganisms, with this unexpected phenomenon further supported by the redox ladder concept as shown in Figure 9.

Figure 8.

Redox indices SO₄^2– (a) and NO₃^– (b) in CBM co-produced water versus gas production rates from the Shizhuangnan block.

Figure 9.

Plot of SO₄^2– concentrations versus NO₃^– concentration in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block (gas production rates indicated by size and color of symbols).

A cross plot of NO₃^– and SO₄^2– concentrations with various gas production rates is shown in Figure 9. Wells with relatively high NO₃^– and SO₄^2– concentrations exhibit negligible gas production rates, demonstrating that the coal seam water conditions are open where neither denitrification nor sulfate reduction is effectively accomplished, limiting the CBM storage capacity (Beckmann et al., 2018). Characteristic wells with low SO₄^2– concentrations and high NO₃^– concentrations generally exhibit highest gas production rates in the study area. Wells with relatively low SO₄^2– concentrations and low NO₃^– concentrations usually do not have relatively high gas production rates, as bacterial denitrification and sulfate reduction occur completely, forming optimal reductive environments (Doerfert et al., 2009). While these conditions were suitable for CBM conservation and enrichment, these wells had poor permeability and therefore had a limited capacity to form depression funnels and discharge gas from coal pores.

Some biogeochemical isotopes relating to redox ladder concept were utilized in this study. Firstly, sulfate reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria affects SO₄^2– isotopes, resulting in enrichment of $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}^{}}^{}$ in residual groundwater with progressively decreasing SO₄^2– concentrations (Barnhart et al., 2016). The relationship between SO₄^2– concentrations and $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}^{}}^{}$ values is shown in Figure 10, with SO₄^2– concentrations ranging from 0 to 7.62 and $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}^{}}^{}$ values ranging from 2 to 4.5‰. Although the data points for these water samples are finite, CBM co-produced water samples exhibit a trend of decreasing SO₄^2– with elevated $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}^{}}^{}$ . It indicates that sulfate reduction did occur in the coal seam water (Yang et al., 2018).

Figure 10.

Plot of SO₄^2– concentrations versus $δ^{34} S_{{SO}_{4}}$ values in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block (gas production rates indicated by size and color of symbols).

Moreover, as shown in Figure 11, the combination of moderately positive δ¹³C_DIC values and negligible SO₄^2– concentrations in the water samples represent the appropriate reductive conditions containing most high and intermediate gas production wells. In contrast, the water samples with higher SO₄^2– concentrations and lower δ¹³C_DIC values characterized by relatively oxidative environments normally correspond to low gas production wells (Guo et al., 2019). This supports the hypothesis that sulfate reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria inhibits methanogenesis (Jones et al., 2010). Meanwhile, the region with highest δ¹³C_DIC values and negligible SO₄^2– concentrations only relates to low production wells, indicating that the most reductive environments are too strict to allow extension of pressure drop funnels and support fluid migration (Bao et al., 2019). Importantly, the output of these wells can potentially be increased by effective measures such as hydraulic fracturing (Hou et al., 2017).

Figure 11.

Plot of SO₄^2– concentrations versus δ¹³C_DIC values in CBM co-produced water from the Shizhuangnan block (gas production rates indicated by size and color of symbols).

Conclusions

The study has assessed the relationship between various geochemical parameters and gas production rates in CBM co-produced water samples from the SZN block. Firstly, analysis of the relationship between major ion concentrations in the water samples and CBM production rates suggests that the wells with high gas production rates often contain high Na⁺ and HCO₃^– concentrations in the water samples. Furthermore, the wells with high and intermediate gas production rates generally contain high concentrations of Na⁺ (>300 mg/L) and HCO₃^– (>600 mg/L) in the water samples.

On the basis of the relative locations of $δ D_{H_{2} O}$ and $δ^{18} O_{H_{2} O}$ from the water samples and the LMWL, the coal reservoir water appeared to be derived from a meteoric origin. Generally, D drift indicates intense geochemical processes in coal strata, and ¹⁸O represents the water samples containing adjoining aquifer constituents. Moreover, the DDI indicates the degree of D drift, providing assessment for coal reservoir environments and CBM production rates. The water samples with negative DDI values suggest low gas production rates, whereas positive DDI values suggest high gas production rates. However, DDI values during the rainy season exhibit completely different results, implying that the isotopes in coal reservoir water can be caused by other factors and are not reliable parameters for CBM production.

The DIC in groundwater mainly originates from organic matter breakdown and carbonate dissolution with typically negative δ¹³C_DIC. It has been proposed that relatively positive δ¹³C_DIC values are caused by methanogenic activity and are indicative parameters of reductive environments. Compared with negative δ¹³C_DIC, positive δ¹³C_DIC values in the water samples illustrate that ideal CBM storage conditions tend to be associated with high gas production rates. However, excessively positive δ¹³C_DIC values indicate more closed coal seams with low permeability, which are unable to form valid pressure drop funnels resulting in low gas production rates.

Taking into account of SO₄^2– and NO₃^– allows the analysis of redox gradients based on sulfate reduction and denitrification. To assess coal reservoir conditions of gas storage, a combination of SO₄^2– and NO₃^– concentrations is used to identify various redox environments for CBM preservation and exploitation. The coal reservoir environments with low SO₄^2– and high NO₃^– concentrations present appropriate closed conditions, forming high gas production rates. In contrast, high SO₄^2– and high NO₃^– concentration environments generally exhibit adverse or open CBM storage conditions resulting in low gas production rates.

Importantly, the combination of δ¹³C_DIC and SO₄^2– is not only useful for evaluation of gas production rates but also predicts potentially beneficial areas. The water samples with moderately high δ¹³C_DIC values and negligible SO₄^2– concentrations represent appropriate reductive conditions, relating to most high and intermediate production wells. In contrast, the water samples with low δ¹³C_DIC values and high SO₄^2– concentrations indicate open or oxidative environments, corresponding to low gas production wells. Moreover, the water samples characterized by highest δ¹³C_DIC values and negligible SO₄^2– concentrations were only observed in low gas production wells, as best reductive environments are too strict to extend pressure drop funnels and support fluid migration. However, CBM production of these wells can potentially be increased by hydraulic fracturing, which provides guidance for the identification of potentially beneficial areas.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the China United Coalbed Methane Corporation for providing the production well date.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41772159/D0208; 41872178; U1910205), the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2017ZX05064003) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2652018233).

ORCID iD

Yang Li

References

Picardal

(2015) Desulfuromonas carbonis sp. nov., an Fe(III), S0, and Mn(IV)-reducing bacterium isolated from an active coalbed methane gas well. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 65: 1686–1693.

Baldassare

McCaffrey

Harper

(2014) A geochemical context for stray gas investigations in the northern Appalachian Basin: Implications of analyses of natural gases from Neogene-through Devonian-age strata. AAPG Bulletin 98(2): 341–372.

Barnhart

Weeks

Jones

EJP

, et al. (2016) Hydrogeochemistry and coal-associated bacterial populations from a methanogenic coal bed. International Journal of Coal Geology 162: 14–26.

Bao

Huang

, et al. (2016) Microbial enhancing coal-bed methane generation potential, constraints and mechanism ‒ A mini review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 35: 68–78.

Bao

Huang

, et al. (2019) Potential and constraints of biogenic methane generation from coals and mudstones from Huaibei coalfield, Eastern China. Energy & Fuels 33(1): 287–295.

Beckmann

Luk

AWS

Gutierrez-Zamora

, et al. (2018) Long-term succession in a coal seam microbiome during in situ biostimulation of coalbed-methane generation. The ISME Journal 13(3): 632–650.

Cai

Liu

Yao

, et al. (2011) Geological controls on prediction of coalbed methane of No. 3 coal seam in Southern Qinshui Basin, North China. International Journal of Coal Geology 88(2–3): 101–112.

Chen

Zhao

, et al. (2018) Analysis of microbial community succession during methane production from Baiyinhua lignite. Energy & Fuels 32(10): 10311–10320.

Cheung

Klassen

Mayer

, et al. (2010) Major ion and isotope geochemistry of fluids and gases from coalbed methane and shallow groundwater wells in Alberta, Canada. Applied Geochemistry 25(9): 1307–1329.

10.

Davis

Barnhart

, et al. (2018) Type and amount of organic amendments affect enhanced biogenic methane production from coal and microbial community structure. Fuel 211: 600–608.

11.

Doerfert

Reichlen

Iyer

, et al. (2009) Methanolobus zinderi sp. nov., a methylotrophic methanogen isolated from a deep subsurface coal seam. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 59(5): 1064–1069.

12.

Zhang

Huang

, et al. (2019) The gas content distribution of coal reservoir at the Changzhi block, south-central Qinshui Basin, North China: Influences of geologic structure and hydrogeology. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37(1): 144–165.

13.

Fan

Luo

, et al. (2019) Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in coal seam for enhancing underground gas drainage. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37(1): 166–193.

14.

Flores

Rice

Stricker

, et al. (2008) Methanogenic pathways of coal-bed gas in the Powder River Basin, United States: the geologic factor. International Journal of Coal Geology 76(1–2): 52–75.

15.

Glossner

Gallagher

Landkamer

, et al. (2016) Factors controlling the co-occurrence of microbial sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in coal bed reservoirs. International Journal of Coal Geology 165: 121–132.

16.

Gui

Chen

Song

(2005) Drift features of oxygen and hydrogen stable isotopes in deep groundwater in mining area of northern Anhui. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology 37(1): 111–114.

17.

Guo

Xia

, et al. (2019) Geological conditions of coalbed methane accumulation in the Hancheng area, southeastern Ordos Basin, China: Implications for coalbed methane high-yield potential. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37(3): 922–944.

18.

Guo

Thompson

, et al. (2014) A contribution of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis to the biogenic coal bed methane reserves of Southern Qinshui Basin, China. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98(21): 9083–9093.

19.

Guo

Zhang

Han

, et al. (2017) Important role of fungi in the production of secondary biogenic coalbed methane in China’s southern Qinshui Basin. Energy & Fuels 31(7): 7197–7207.

20.

Hakil

Amin-Ali

Hirschler-Rea

, et al. (2013) Desulfatiferula berrensis sp. nov., a n-alkene-degrading sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from estuarine sediments. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 64: 540–544.

21.

Hamilton

Golding

Baublys

, et al. (2014) Stable isotopic and molecular composition of desorbed coal seam gases from the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Australia. International Journal of Coal Geology 122: 21–36.

22.

Huang

Sang

, et al. (2017) Signature of coproduced water quality for coalbed methane development. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 47: 34–46.

23.

Humez

Mayer

Nightingale

, et al. (2016) Redox controls on methane formation, migration and fate in shallow aquifers. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 20(7): 2759–2777.

24.

Hou

Zhu

Chen

, et al. (2017) Gas flow mechanisms under the effects of pore structures and permeability characteristics in source rocks of coal measures in Qinshui Basin, China. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 35(3): 338–355.

25.

Jones

EJP

Voytek

Corum

, et al. (2010) Stimulation of methane generation from nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial Consortium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76(21): 7013–7022.

26.

Jian

(2017) Geochemical characteristics of produced water from CBM wells and implications for commingling CBM production: A case study of the Bide-Santang basin, western Guizhou, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 159: 666–678.

27.

, et al. (2016) Water-rock interaction and methanogenesis in formation water in the southeast Huaibei coalfield, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology 77: 435–447.

28.

Shi

Tang

(2019) Microbial geochemical characteristics of the coalbed methane in the Shizhuangnan block of Qinshui Basin, North China and their geological implications. Acta Geologica Sinica – English Edition 93(3): 660–674.

29.

Mayumi

Mochimaru

Tamaki

, et al. (2016) Methane production from coal by a single methanogen. Science (New York, N.Y.) 354(6309): 222–225.

30.

Mori

Iino

Suzuki

, et al. (2012) Aceticlastic and NaCl-requiring methanogen “Methanosaeta pelagica” sp. nov., isolated from marine tidal flat sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78(9): 3416–3423.

31.

Moore

(2012) Coalbed methane: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101: 36–81.

32.

Owen

DDR

Raiber

Cox

(2015) Relationships between major ions in coal seam gas groundwaters: Examples from the Surat and Clarence-Moreton basins. International Journal of Coal Geology 137: 77–91.

33.

Pashin

McIntyre-Redden

Mann

, et al. (2014) Relationships between water and gas chemistry in mature coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior Basin. International Journal of Coal Geology 126: 92–105.

34.

Pan

Wood

(2015) Coalbed methane (CBM) exploration, reservoir characterisation, production, and modelling: A collection of published research (2009–2015). Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26: 1472–1484.

35.

Rice

Flores

Stricker

, et al. (2008) Chemical and stable isotopic evidence for water/rock interaction and biogenic origin of coalbed methane, fort union formation, Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana, USA. International Journal of Coal Geology 76(1–2): 76–85.

36.

Salmachi

Sayyafzadeh

Haghighi

(2013) Infill well placement optimization in coal bed methane reservoirs using genetic algorithm. Fuel 111: 248–258.

37.

Schweitzer

Ritter

McIntosh

, et al. (2019) Changes in microbial communities and associated water and gas geochemistry across a sulfate gradient in coal beds: Powder River Basin, USA. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 245: 495–513.

38.

Tao

Tang

, et al. (2014) Factors controlling high-yield coalbed methane vertical wells in the Fanzhuang Block, Southern Qinshui Basin. International Journal of Coal Geology 134–135: 38–45.

39.

Tao

Tang

, et al. (2017) Fluid velocity sensitivity of coal reservoir and its effect on coalbed methane well productivity: A case of Baode Block, northeastern Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 152: 229–237.

40.

Vidic

Brantley

Vandenbossche

, et al. (2013) Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science (New York, N.Y.) 340(6134): 1095–9203.

41.

Vinson

Blair

Martini

, et al. (2017) Microbial methane from in situ biodegradation of coal and shale: A review and reevaluation of hydrogen and carbon isotope signatures. Chemical Geology 453: 128–145.

42.

Wang

Sun

Tang

, et al. (2015) Hydrological control rule on coalbed methane enrichment and high yield in FZ Block of Qinshui Basin. Fuel 140: 568–577.

43.

Wang

Tang

Wan

, et al. (2013) The hydrogen and oxygen isotope characteristics of drainage water from Taiyuan coal reservoir. Journal of the China Coal Society 38(3): 448–454.

44.

Warner

Kresse

Hays

, et al. (2013) Geochemical and isotopic variations in shallow groundwater in areas of the Fayetteville Shale development, north-central Arkansas. Applied Geochemistry 35: 207–220.

45.

Liu

Zhou

, et al. (2019) Analysis of key factors and prediction of gas production pressure of coalbed methane well: Combining grey relational with principal component regression analysis. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37(4): 1348–1363.

46.

Yang

Qin

, et al. (2018) Characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in produced water and productivity response of coalbed methane wells in western Guizhou. Energy & Fuels 32(11): 11203–11211.

47.

Yang

Chen

, et al. (2018) Potential of biogenic methane for pilot-scale fermentation ex situ with lump anthracite and the changes of methanogenic consortia. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 45(4): 229–237.

48.

Zhang

Tang

, et al. (2015) Stable isotope characteristics of CBM co-produced water and implications for CBM development: The example of the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui Basin, China. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 27: 1400–1411.

49.

Zhang

Tang

, et al. (2016) Study of hydrochemical characteristics of CBM co-produced water of the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui Basin, China, on its implication of CBM development. International Journal of Coal Geology 159: 169–182.

50.

Zhang

Qin

Bai

, et al. (2018) Hydrogeochemistry characteristics of produced waters from CBM wells in Southern Qinshui Basin and implications for CBM commingled development. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 56: 428–443.

Biogeochemistry and the associated redox signature of co-produced water from coalbed methane wells in the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui Basin,China

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Geological setting

Structure

Hydrogeology

Coal reservoir for CBM exploitation

Material and methods

Samples collection

Analytical methods

Results and discussion

Major ion composition and CBM production

Characteristic pattern of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes and CBM production

Application of dissolved inorganic carbon isotopic ratio for CBM exploration

Application of redox parameter signatures associated with microbial activity for CBM exploration

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References