For decades, citizen participation in important political decisions has declined and the promotion of democratic ideas in the world of work has become less significant. This study tests the ‘spillover thesis’ advanced by Carole Pateman, which argues that democratic participation in the workplace will ‘spill over’ into political participation. This study incorporates broad-based employee ownership, which provides employees with access to formal collective ownership of the company they work for, into the theoretical framework of the spillover thesis. This study also applies the latent-class analysis technique to identify the patterns of political behaviors. The results identified distinct patterns of political behaviors and demonstrated that demographic factors as well as differences in political efficacy contributed to the differences between patterns.
AdmanP (2008) Does workplace experience enhance political participation? A critical test of a venerable hypothesis. Political Behavior30(1): 115–138.
2.
ArrighiBAMaumeDJ (1994) Workplace control and political participation. Sociological Focus27(2): 147–159.
3.
AyalaLJ (2000) Trained for democracy: The differing effects of voluntary and involuntary organizations on political participation. Political Research Quarterly53(1): 99–115.
4.
Ben-NerAHanTSJonesDC (1994) The productivity effects of employee participation in control and in economic returns: A review of empirical evidence. In: PaganoURowthornR (eds) Democracy and Efficiency in the Economic Enterprise. London: Routledge, pp. 209–244.
5.
BernsteinP (1976) Workplace Democratization: Its Internal Dynamics. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
BlasiJRConteMKruseDL (1996) Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies. ILR Review50(1): 60–79.
8.
BlumbergP (1973) Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation. New York: Schocken Books.
9.
BoguslawJBriceTS (2022) Employee ownership: Structuring opportunities for racial wealth building and family well-being. Families in Society103(2): 135–150.
10.
BoguslawJSchurL (2019) Building the assets of low and moderate income workers and their families. New Brunswick, NJ: Institute for the Study of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing.
11.
BradyHEVerbaSSchlozmanKL (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89(2): 271–294.
12.
BuddJWGollanPJWilkinsonA (2010) New approaches to employee voice and participation in organizations. Human Relations63(3): 303–310.
13.
BuddJWLamareJRTimmingAR (2018) Learning about democracy at work: Cross-national evidence on individual employee voice influencing political participation in civil society. ILR Review71(4): 956–985.
14.
BurnSMKonradAM (1987) Political participation: A matter of community stress job autonomy and contact by political organizations. Political Psychology8(1): 125–138.
15.
CampbellAGurinGMillerWE (1954) The Voter Decides. Oxford: Row Peterson and Co.
16.
CarterN (2006) Political participation and the workplace: The spillover thesis revisited. British Journal of Politics and International Relations8(3): 410–426.
17.
ConstantinoSMCoopermanADMoreiraTM (2021) Voting in a global pandemic: Assessing dueling influences of Covid-19 on turnout. Social Science Quarterly102(5): 2210–2235.
18.
CornelsonKMilouchevaB (2022) Political polarization and cooperation during a pandemic. Health Economics31(9): 2025–2049.
19.
CraigSCMaggiottoMA (1982) Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology8(3): 85–109.
20.
CraigSCNiemiRGSilverGE (1990) Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior12(3): 289–314.
21.
D’ArtDTurnerT (2007) Trade unions and political participation in the European Union: Still providing a democratic dividend?British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 103–126.
22.
DavernMBautistaRFreeseJ, et al. (1972–2024) General Social Survey 1972–2024 [Machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator: M Davern; Co-Principal Investigators: R Bautista, J Freese, P Herd and SL Morgan. Sponsored by National Science Foundation (NORC) at the University of Chicago.
23.
DruckmanJNKlarSKrupnikovY, et al. (2021) How affective polarization shapes Americans’ political beliefs: A study of response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science8(3): 223–234.
24.
EldenJM (1981) Political efficacy at work: The connection between more autonomous forms of workplace organization and a more participatory politics. American Political Science Review75(1): 43–58.
25.
FreemanRBRogersJ (1999) What Workers Want. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
FreemanRBBlasiJRKruseDL (2010) Introduction. In: KruseDLFreemanRBBlasiJR (eds) Shared Capitalism at Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–37.
27.
FreemanSF (2007) Effects of ESOP adoption and employee ownership: Thirty years of research and experience. Organizational Dynamics Working Papers 2.
28.
GibsonRCantijochM (2013) Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?The Journal of Politics75(3): 701–716.
29.
GodardJ (2007) Is good work good for democracy? Work, change at work and political participation in Canada and England. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(4): 760–790.
30.
GreenbergES (2008) Spillovers from cooperative and democratic workplaces: Have the benefits been oversold? In: SnyderMSullivanBSullivanJ (eds) Cooperation: The Political Psychology of Effective Human Interaction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 219–239.
31.
GreenbergESGrunbergLDanielK (1996) Industrial work and political participation: Beyond ‘simple spillover.’Political Research Quarterly49(2): 305–330.
32.
GrimaldaGMurtinFPipkeD, et al. (2023) The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19. European Economic Review156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472
33.
GuiB (1994) Is there a chance for the worker-managed form of organization? In: PaganoURowthornR (eds) Democracy and Efficiency in the Economic Enterprise. London: Routledge, pp. 164–183.
34.
HammerTHSternRN (1980) Employee ownership: Implications for the organizational distribution of power. Academy of Management Journal23(1): 78–100.
35.
HammerTHLandauJCSternRN (1981) Absenteeism when workers have a voice: The case of employee ownership. Journal of Applied Psychology66(5): 561–573.
36.
HarrisonJSFreemanRE (2004) Special topic: Democracy in and around organizations. Is organizational democracy worth the effort?The Academy of Management Executive18(3): 49–53.
37.
HoogheMOserJMarienS (2016) A comparative analysis of ‘good citizenship’: A latent class analysis of adolescents’ citizenship norms in 38 countries. International Political Science Review37(1): 115–129.
38.
HustinxLMeijsLCHandyFCnaanRA (2012) Monitorial citizens or civic omnivores? Repertoires of civic participation among university students. Youth and Society44(1): 95–117.
39.
JianGJeffresL (2008) Spanning the boundaries of work: Workplace participation, political efficacy, and political involvement. Communication Studies59(1): 35–50.
40.
JirjahnULeTXT (2023) Political spillovers of workplace democracy in Germany. IZA Discussion Papers No. 15444. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
41.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–308.
42.
KaswanMJ (2014) Developing democracy: Cooperatives and democratic theory. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development6(2): 190–205.
43.
KerrJPanagopoulosCVan Der LindenS (2021) Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892
44.
KimJ (2021) Democratic spillover from workplace into politics: What are we measuring and how?Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations26: 145–176.
KnudsenHBusckOLindJ (2011) Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment and Society25(3): 379–396.
47.
LaffertyGMcMillenJ (1989) Labouring for leisure: Work and industrial relations in the tourism industry. Case studies of casinos. Labour and Industry2(1): 32–59.
48.
LopesHLagoaSCalapezT (2014) Declining autonomy at work in the EU and its effect on civic behavior. Economic and Industrial Democracy35(2): 341–366.
49.
MadsenM (1997) The ‘classroom hypothesis’ and individualization. Economic and Industrial Democracy18(3): 359–391.
50.
MasonRM (1982) Participatory and Workplace Democracy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
NightingaleDV (1982) Workplace Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53.
NovaesFCAquinoSDD (2021) Post-pandemic world: Individual and political consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal) 26(1): 3–12 .
54.
NylundKLAsparouhovTMuthจฆnBO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling14(4): 535–569.
55.
OserJHoogheMMarienS (2013) Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly66(1): 91–101.
56.
PatemanC (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
PetersonSA (1992) Workplace politicization and its political spillovers: A research note. Economic and Industrial Democracy13(4): 511–524.
58.
PetersonSALeitkoTAMilesWG (1981) Worker participation and the spillover effect: The case of labor-management committees. Economic and Industrial Democracy2(1): 27–44.
59.
PfeiferC (2023) Can worker codetermination stabilize democracies? Works councils and satisfaction with democracy in Germany. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre.
60.
PorcuMGiambonaF (2017) Introduction to latent class analysis with applications. The Journal of Early Adolescence37(1): 129–158.
61.
PrasnikarJPrasnikarV (1986) The Yugoslav self-managed firm in historical perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy7(2): 167–190.
62.
RhodesSRSteersRM (1981) Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations34(12): 1013–1035.
63.
RosenC (2023) Employee ownership in the USA: Lessons to consider in creating more inclusive capitalism. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership6(3): 215–229.
SchlachterLHMárK (2020) Spillover selection or substitution? Workplace and civic participation in democratic firms. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
66.
SchumpeterJA (1947) Capitalism Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
67.
SchurLEatonARubinsteinS (2004) High involvement work systems and political efficacy: A tale of two departments. In: EatonA (ed.) Industrial Relations Research Association Series Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 9–18.
68.
SchweizerSL (1995) Participation, workplace democracy and the problem of representative government. Polity27(3): 359–377.
69.
ShepherdHMacKendrickNMoraGC (2020) Pandemic politics: Political worldviews and COVID-19 beliefs and practices in an unsettled time. Socius6: 1–18.
70.
SobelR (1993) From occupational involvement to political participation: An exploratory analysis. Political Behavior15(4): 339–353.
71.
SommerURappel-KroyzerO (2022) Pandemic politics in the United States: COVID-19 as a new type of political emergency. Political Psychology43(4): 769–792.
72.
TakS (2017) Cooperative membership and community engagement: findings from a Latin American survey. Sociological Forum32(3): 566–586.
73.
TeinJYCoxeSChamH (2013) Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling20(4): 640–657.
74.
TimmingASummersJ (2020) Is workplace democracy associated with wider pro-democracy affect? A structural equation model. Economic and Industrial Democracy41(3): 709–726.
75.
UvalicM (1994) People’s capitalism: Profit sharing and financial participation in capitalist enterprises. In: PaganoURowthornR (eds) Democracy and Efficiency in the Economic Enterprise. London: Routledge, pp. 245–268.
76.
WeberWGUnterrainerCHögeT (2020) Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta-analysis of individual, organisational, and societal outcomes. Applied Psychology69(3): 1009–1071.
77.
WeertsDJCabreraAFMejíasPP (2014) Uncovering categories of civically engaged college students: A latent class analysis. Review of Higher Education37(2): 141–168.
78.
WeissbourdJConwayMKleinJ, et al. (2021) Race and gender wealth equity and the role of employee share ownership. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership4(2): 116–135.
79.
WitteJF (1978) Democracy, authority and alienation in work: Workers’ participation in an American corporation. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
80.
ZippJFLuebkePLandermanR (1984) The social bases of support for workplace democracy. Sociological Perspectives27(4): 395–425.
