This contribution scrutinises how introducing a statutory minimum wage of EUR 8.50 per hour, in January 2015, impacted German employees’ decision with regard to union membership. Based on representative data from the Labour Market and Social Security panel, the study applies a logistic difference-in-differences propensity score matching approach on entries into and withdrawals from unions in the German Trade Union Confederation (Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, DGB). The results show no separate effect on withdrawals from or entries into unions after the minimum wage introduction for those employees who benefited financially from it, but a significant increase of entries overall. Thus, unions’ campaign for a minimum wage strengthened their position in total but did not reverse the segmentation of union membership patterns.
AbadieACattaneoM (2018) Econometric methods for program evaluation. Annual Review of Economics10: 465–503.
2.
AghionPAlganYCahucO (2008) Can policy interact with culture? Minimum wage and the quality of labor relations. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3680.
3.
AndersCBiebelerHLeschH (2015) Mitgliederentwicklung und politische Einflussnahme: Die deutschen Gewerkschaften im Aufbruch?IW-Trends - Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung42(1): 21–36.
4.
AtheySImbensGW (2006) Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica27(2): 431–497.
5.
BeckmannF (2020) Perceived job quality in German minijobs: A multidimensional analysis of work in marginal part-time employment relationships. Management Revue31(2): 116–144.
6.
BellmannLBosslerMGernerHHüblerO (2021) Collective bargaining coverage, works councils and the new German minimum wage. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(2): 269–288.
7.
BinderkrantzASChristiansenPMPedersenHH (2015) Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance28(1): 95–112.
8.
BlanchflowerD (2007) International patterns of union membership. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 1–28.
9.
BoothAL (1985) The free rider problem and a social custom model of trade union membership. The Quarterly Journal of Economics100(1): 253–261.
10.
BoschG (2018) The making of the German minimum wage: A case study of institutional change. Industrial Relations Journal49(1): 19–33.
11.
BosslerMBroszeitS (2017) Do minimum wages increase job satisfaction? Micro-data evidence from the new German minimum wage. Labour31(4): 480–493.
12.
BosslerMMöllerJ (2018) Auswirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns. IAB-Stellungnahme 1/2018.
13.
BrenkeKMüllerK-U (2013) Gesetzlicher Mindestlohn. Kein verteilungspolitisches Allheilmittel. DIW Wochenbericht39: 3–17.
14.
BruttelOBaumannADütschM (2018) The new German statutory minimum wage in comparative perspective: Employment effects and other adjustment channels. European Journal of Industrial Relations24(2): 145–162.
15.
BurauelPGrabkaMSchröderC, et al. (2018) Auswirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns auf die Lohnstruktur. Studie im Auftrag der Mindestlohnkommission, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Evaluation Office Caliendo, Berlin.
16.
CaliendoMWittbrodtLSchröderC (2019) The causal effects of the minimum wage introduction in Germany – An overview. German Economic Review20(3): 257–292.
17.
CarruthASchnabelC (1990) Empirical modelling of trade union growth in Germany, 1956–1986: Traditional versus cointegration and error correction methods. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv126(2): 326–346.
18.
ChaisonGNDhavaleDG (1992) The choice between union membership and free-rider status. Journal of Labor Research13(4): 355–369.
19.
CharlwoodA (2002) Why do non-union employees want to unionize? Evidence from Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(3): 463–491.
20.
ChecchiDLuciforaC (2002) Unions and labour market institutions in Europe. Economic Policy17(1): 361–408.
21.
DingeldeyIKathmannT (2017) Einführung und Wirkmächtigkeit des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns in Deutschland: Institutionelle Reformen und gewerkschaftliche Strategien in einem segmentierten Tarifsystem. Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft, No. 21/2017, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen, Bremen.
22.
DribbuschHBirkeP (2019) Gewerkschaften in Deutschland. Herausforderungen in Zeiten des Umbruchs. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
23.
EbbinghausBGöbelC (2013) Mitgliederrückgang und Organisationsstrategien deutscher Gewerkschaften. In: SchroederW (ed.) Handbuch Gewerkschaften in Deutschland. Cham: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 207–239.
24.
EichhorstWMarxP (2011) Reforming German labour market institutions: A dual path to flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy21(1): 73–87.
25.
FalkAFehrEZehnderC (2006) Fairness perceptions and reservation wages. The behavioral effects of minimum wage laws. Quarterly Journal of Economics121(4): 1347–1381.
26.
FitzenbergerBKohnKWangQ (2011) The erosion of union membership in Germany: Determinants, densities, decompositions. Journal of Population Economics24(1): 141–165.
27.
FuråkerBBengtssonM (2013) On the road to transnational cooperation? Results from a survey of European trade unions. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(2): 161–177.
28.
GanglM (2010) Causal inference in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology36: 21–47.
29.
GregoryTZierahnU (2020) When the minimum wage really bites hard: Impact on top earners and skill supply. Institute of Labour Economics, Discussion Paper Series, Bonn.
30.
HaipeterT (2012) Sozialpartnerschaft in und nach der Krise: Entwicklungen und Perspektiven. Industrielle Beziehungen19(4): 387–411.
31.
HasselA (2009) Policies and politics in social pacts in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations15(1): 7–26.
32.
HeckmanJIchimuraHToddPE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies64: 605–654.
33.
HeckmanJIchimuraHSmithJToddP (1998) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica66: 1017–1098.
34.
HollandPW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association81(396): 945–960.
35.
ImbensGWWooldridgeJM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature47(1): 5–86.
36.
JachimowiczJMDuncanSWeberEUJohnsonEJ (2017) When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy87: 1–28.
37.
LechnerM (2010) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics4(3): 165–224.
38.
MarxPStarkeP (2017) Dualization as destiny? The political economy of the German minimum wage reform. Politics & Society45(4): 559–584.
39.
MeyerB (2016) Learning to love the government: Trade unions and late adoption of the minimum wage. World Politics68(3): 538–575.
40.
Mindestlohnkommission (2016) Erster Bericht zu den Auswirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns. Bericht der Mindestlohnkommission an die Bundesregierung nach § 9 Abs. 4 Mindestlohngesetz. Berlin
41.
Mindestlohnkommission (2018) Zweiter Bericht zu den Auswirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns. Bericht der Mindestlohnkommission an die Bundesregierung nach § 9 Abs. 4 Mindestlohngesetz. Berlin
42.
MorganSWinshipC (2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MüllerSDettmannEFacklerD, et al. (2018) Lohnunterschiede zwischen Betrieben in Ost- und Westdeutschland: Ausmaß und mögliche Erklärungsfaktoren. Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2017. IAB Forschungsbericht, 6.
44.
MüllerTSchultenT (2020) The European minimum wage on the doorstep. ETUI Policy Brief, No. 1/2020.
45.
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
PearlJ (1995) Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika82(4): 669–688.
47.
PuschTSeifertH (2017) Unzureichende Umsetzung des Mindestlohns bei Minijobbern. Wirtschaftsdienst97(3): 187–191.
48.
RubinD (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology66(5): 688–701.
49.
SchrenkerAZuccoA (2020) The gender pay gap begins to increase sharply at age 30. DIW Weekly Report10(10): 72–82.
50.
SchroederWFuthSKSchulzeM (2016) Der Weg zur Forderung nach einem allgemeinen gesetzlichen Mindestlohn – Gewerkschaftliche Deutungs- und Präferenzkonflikte. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft26: 135–154.
51.
SobelME (2005) Discussion: ‘The scientific model of causality’. Sociological Methodology35(1): 99–133.
52.
SpohrF (2019) Germany’s labour market polices: How the sick man of Europe performed a second economic miracle. In: ComptonM‘t HartP (eds) Great Policy Successes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 283–303.
53.
StreeckW (1987) Vielfalt und Interdependenz. Überlegungen zur Rolle von intermediären Organisationen in sich ändernden Umwelten. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie39: 471–495.
54.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2020) Verdienste und Arbeitskosten. Arbeitnehmerverdienste. Fachserie 16, Reihe 2.1
55.
TrappmannMBesteJBethmannAMüllerG (2013) The PASS panel survey after six waves. Journal for Labour Market Research46(4): 275–281.
56.
VisserJ (2002) Why fewer workers join unions in Europe: A social custom explanation of membership trends. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(3): 403–430.
57.
WinshipCMorganS (1999) The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology25: 659–706.
58.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
